Readers like you help support MUO. When you make a purchase using links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Read More.
Which app works better at allowing multiple users to share one computer - SoftExpand or Windows Multipoint server ?
And if you've used either, what are your experiences regarding things to watch for, and total cost per user?
2012-12-14 04:09:39
...well, SoftExpand seems to have more supporters so far - can anyone elaborate a little more on why ? (and by the way - trial eval periods are never a substitute for long-term experience with a product - by the end of the trial, you're just starting to get comfortable with the software IMHO)
2013-05-27 20:44:11
For video/games/graphics softxpand is much better. Multipoint server uses about 5 times more resources for video playback. For 3d multipoint server is useless. But for office work and classrooms multipoint offers better manageability - you can use direct connected, usb connected, rdp connected thin clients or even separate computers (win7) and you cam manage them from the multipoint server.
2012-12-13 19:42:43
Softexpand is much more better than windows multipoint server.............
2012-12-13 15:49:41
I have tested SoftExpand and found it very good.
2012-12-13 14:02:43
there should be trial period, download and see the difference.Upgrade from Windows Multipoint Server 2011 to SoftXpand 2011http://www.miniframe.com/knowledge-base.html?catid=1&kbartid=76
2012-12-13 05:31:14
Windows Multipoint server