The 3 Most Effective Quick Photo Fixes You Can Apply To An Image

Tim Brookes 21-02-2013

photo fixesPhoto editing is a fine art that you can only learn by experimenting. In the long run you will eventually find your own style, your own preferences and hopefully recognize some of your shortcomings 5 Websites With Free Photo Contests To Improve Your Photography Skills Read More as a photographer while tidying up in the post process.


Too much fiddling and you’ll end up with a photo that looks over-processed and gaudy It's Time We Had a Word About Overdone HDR Photography... [Opinion] HDR stands for High Dynamic Range, and in photographic terms generally produces an image where the entire scene is balanced, and evenly exposed. Recently I’ve not been seeing much of this on the web. I’m... Read More , but focusing your efforts in the wrong area might not yield any improvements at all. There are a few fixes that can really make a picture stand out, and they’re often the simplest of things.

Better still, by paying attention to where you went wrong and fixing it in post, you can improve your overall skills What EXIF Photo Data Is, How to Find It & How to Understand It Pretty much every digital camera available today records EXIF data within each image you take. The data is useful for improving your photography and can also be quite interesting, especially if you're a geek. Read More as a photographer.

Retouchers Take Note 

If you want to be able to fix, change and generally manipulate virtually every variable in your image then you should always be shooting in RAW mode. RAW files are considerably bigger than their JPEG counterparts, especially as sensor sizes continue to grow to full-frame levels. RAW files might take up more room, but your adjustments can go so much further 10 Must-Know Photoshop Skills for Beginner Photographers Here are the most useful photo-editing features in Adobe Photoshop, even if you have no previous photo editing experience. Read More .

You’d be amazed how many times a photographer has salvaged what is seemingly a throw-away shot with a bit of clever RAW manipulation. That said, by no means should shooting in RAW be your license to slack-off as a photographer and think “I’ll fix it in post” – it doesn’t work that way.

Balancing The Exposure 

We’ve run a few articles in the past about the importance of the histogram How To Read Your Camera's Histogram And Take Perfectly Balanced Images Read More when it comes to digital photography. It’s a luxury that analogue photography lacked, and once you learn how to read it then you should be able to produce better balanced images, with less blown-out highlights and lost shadows.


However if you have got a slightly dark or overly bright image, tweaking the exposure will remedy the problem to an extent. If your highlights are way too blown out (i.e. white is a prevalent theme) then don’t hold too much hope, but then again you might be surprised how much you can recover. Here’s an example image:

photo fixes

It’s not a great photo, it won’t win any awards and as you can see it’s been under-exposed. That doesn’t mean it’s completely lost however, and so if I increase the exposure by +1.3 EV then the histogram looks something like this:

tips for fixing photos


Luckily I’ve not lost any detail in the sky because it was a sunny day, but if the sky is cloudy you might consider adding a graduated filter or manually touching up the sky to reduce the exposure slightly and recover the shadow details. The final image looks like this, and the adjustment took literally a second:

tips for fixing photos

White Balance & Skin Tones 

White balance is the bane of many photographers, depending on their specialty. If you’re shooting in conditions that rapidly change, or there are multiple sources of light that conflict (i.e. the sun and artificial lighting) then you’re looking at spending some time fixing all those off-whites and alien skin tones.

Shooting live music is something I’m very familiar with, and a good example of rapidly changing lighting conditions. Using colored lights to your advantage is all good and well, but there’s a fine line between creativity and ill-looking performers and for that reason you’ll want to correct the whites or the skin tones, like in this photo:


tips for fixing photos

In the photo above I’ve slightly increased the exposure and pushed the blacks up a touch, but left the white balance on the “as shot” mode, which was set to automatic metering. There are two light sources here – natural light beaming through the top of the tent, and spotlights shining on the performer from the left and right. This means we’ll never balance the two – one will look warmer, the other cooler. When it comes to portraiture, or shots of people in general, I’d always recommend correcting for skin tones, which means that balancing for the white on the performer’s jacket should yield good results:

fixing images

By changing the white balance temperature from 4800K to 2900K and balancing the results with the tint, the white of the jacket (and guitar scratchplate) now looks a lot whiter, though the naturally-lit roof now a slightly bluish tint. On the plus side, the performer looks far less jaundiced and there’s some subtle pink coming through on the left of his jacket probably from another stage light.


Bring Me The (Straightened) Horizon 

If there’s one thing that consistently ruins photos for me it’s a wonky horizon. Dutch angles and “creative” composure aside, if you’ve got a picture with the horizon in it – or a body of water, a wall, or something else which otherwise represents “straightness” then you’ve got little excuse to not fix it. Take this photo taken on a lake in Switzerland:

fixing images

Most straightening tools work in the same manner – grab the horizon or other “straight” feature and draw a line along it. You will lose some of your image because it will be cropped out to allow for the straightening, but your image will look so much more pleasing on the eye. If you start to notice a lot of your shots aren’t straight try shooting with grid lines on if your camera supports it, and remind yourself while taking photos to check the horizon:

photo fixes

This isn’t to say photos must always be straight, don’t be afraid to be creative. Just avoid being creative at the expense of a visually pleasing image.

Combining these three quick photo fixes can really transform a throw-away exposure into a keeper. Let us know what you think of these tips, what works for you and your own photo editing tips!

Related topics: Adobe Photoshop, Image Editor, Photography.

Affiliate Disclosure: By buying the products we recommend, you help keep the site alive. Read more.

Whatsapp Pinterest

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Keith Swartz
    February 21, 2013 at 9:50 pm

    Good deal. Very well written. Thank you much.

  2. Ron Lister
    February 21, 2013 at 7:30 pm

    Thanks for the great tips

  3. Guy McDowell
    February 21, 2013 at 3:49 pm

    Totally agree about the horizon line! That drives me bonkers when I see it.

    A designer friend also showed me that many times just applying auto-levels in Photoshop makes a photo much more pleasing. It does, most of the time for me at least.

    • Tim Brookes
      February 21, 2013 at 10:23 pm

      Yeah I suppose auto-levels does do a good job, I just prefer a bit more manual control over the end result rather than letting Photoshop sort it out. If you can learn how you achieved something then you can recreate it and tweak it in future work.

      And yeah... I'm a bit obsessive about a wonky horizon. I couldn't care less about holiday snaps on Facebook, it's when I see a "professional" photo with a wonky horizon that makes me want to eat my fist.

  4. Mac Witty
    February 21, 2013 at 12:31 pm

    I would include a bit of sharpness in my workflow

    • Tim Brookes
      February 21, 2013 at 10:21 pm

      Interesting, but just how much difference can sharpness make? I'm of the opinion if your subject is out of focus then the shot is discarded...

      Maybe for landscape or architecture it works better. I'm also careful (due to the age of my equipment) with the sharpening slider because it tends to sharpen the grain too. My old Nikon tends to bring out some pretty bad grain once you go past ISO400 (800 and 1600 are workable, but they tend to look quite muddy). Newer SLRs shouldn't have this problem as much though.

      • Mac Witty
        February 22, 2013 at 10:05 am

        For photos for the web I think they "stand out" a bit more with a little touch of sharpening. If lazy I use unsharp mask filter but often less than the "normal" recommendation. Otherwise I think High Pass Filter is a better method as it offers more control, esp to avoid sharpen the grain

  5. Kieran Colfer
    February 21, 2013 at 10:09 am

    One good trick with a cloudy sky if you have a steady camera (like on a tripod) is to do a "manual HDR" - so take an exposure/white balance of the sky, one of the ground, and merge them later in photoshop or your editor of choice. Only works with a tripod tho as any little shake of the camera when you're changing the EV gives you a world of hurt later in photoshop matching everything up straight.

    On your lake pic I would've taken another one white balanced against the buildings in the background as well, the background is looking a bit purpley :-P

    • Tim Brookes
      February 21, 2013 at 10:18 pm

      I'm personally not a massive fan of HDR, I think it's been done to death. Also I was on a boat, so I was certainly not on a stable surface (nor did I have a tripod). It's purpley because of the cloud that descended that day, but taking your method I could have duplicated the RAW file 3 times, exposed each for the highlights, shadows and midtones and then done an HDR exposure of those.

      The thing about that though is it's not really a quick fix, and a lot of HDR has a tendency to look like toxic sludge the other side. I'd probably use a mask to "paint" in more detail if I was going to go with that approach.

      Thanks for your comment!

  6. Phúc Ng?c
    February 21, 2013 at 8:00 am

    Thank you, Tim! Really need this!