Future Tech Technology Explained

How Technology May Be Influencing Human Evolution

Matthew Hughes 27-08-2014

There’s not a single aspect of the human experience that hasn’t been touched by technology. Everything from industry, to medicine, to how we work has been fundamentally reshaped by the technologies which emerged in the second half of the 20th century.


Technology can also change the human in terms of his or her characteristics and abilities. Want to be smarter? You can take a Nootropic. Want to perceive the world with more detail and more information? Put on Google Glasses. Want to get stronger or more physically agile? There are medicines or robotic exoskeletons 4 Technologies That Could Change the World Right now is such an exciting time to be alive, as science and technology hurtles humanity forward at such incredible rates. Who would've thought ten years ago that we'd have one touch access to all... Read More .

Technology has moved away from merely making our lives more convenient, and now it has the potential to change every aspect of what we are as humans. We are becoming transhuman. But what does that mean?

What Is Transhumanism?

Transhumanism is a movement that aims to understand what makes one human, and how we can surpass our natural limitations. It believes that there is an imperative to enhance our capabilities, and that limitations to those abilities can be overcome. More importantly, it believes that technology and science are the keys to overcoming them.


But what are those limitations? They could be life expectancy. They could be mental acumen and intelligence. They could also be physical in nature, such as one’s strength, the speed in which one runs a race, or perhaps the way one metabolizes food.


Technologies and medicines that address these limitations are constantly being released, developed, and improved upon. More and more enhancement supplements or drugs are hitting the shelves of stores, and are being prescribed by doctors. But what does this mean for our society- are we all heading towards becoming more than human?

Why Do We Try To Enhance Our Species?

It is only recently that we’ve found ourselves actually able to extend our lifespans, our biological abilities, and our intellectual capabilities with technology. For millennia, humans lived within their biological boundaries, never overcoming them. Despite that, humans have always found an urge to become more than what we are, as history and anthropology shows.

Indeed, one can look back as far as the ancient Greeks for stories of people looking to enhance their physical capabilities. Perhaps the most famous of these is the tale of Icarus and Daedalus, who constructed wings so that they might take to the skies like a bird, and escape from imprisonment in Crete.



One should also note that Greek mythology is replete with tales of quests for mythical Fountains of Youth which would eternally stave off death and allow one to become immortal. The desire to become more than human is certainly not new.

One individual who has done significant research in the field of transhumanism is Prof. Nayef Al-Rodhan, an Oxford University Scholar and senior fellow. He is also the Director of the Centre for the Geopolitics of Globalization and Transnational Security in Geneva, Switzerland.


This Harvard and Yale educated neuroscientist, philosopher and author has written prolifically on the subject of transhumanism and its role in society, and is widely regarded as one of the foremost authorities in his field.


Prof. Al-Rodhan believes that humans have an innate nature that compels us to enhance our physical and mental abilities. This drive will eventually bring us to the brink of what he calls ‘Inevitable Transhumanism’, where humans fundamentally enhance their abilities through the convergence and adoption of a number of emerging technologies, such as nanotechnology, artificial intelligence and genomics.

In ‘Inevitable Transhumanism? How Emerging Strategic Technologies will affect the Future of Humanity‘, Prof. Al-Rodhan postulates that humans are genetically and neuro-chemically hardwired to ‘feel good’, and are driven by a number of factors he collectively calls ‘Neuro P5’. These consist of power, profit, pleasure, pride and permanency.

Any technology that enhances a factor in the Neuro P5 is likely to be adopted, since it appeals to the feelings that make us ‘feel good’. This will then push us further and further to a transhumanist outcome, where the human experience is artificially enhanced or changed. Prof. Al-Rodhan believes in the inevitability of this, and describes it not as a question of ‘how’ or ‘if’, but rather ‘when’ and ‘at what cost’.

If we’re truly driven to artificially evolve past our biological capacities, then there are some questions that should be asked. Firstly, what will that look like? Secondly, what is our capacity to become transhuman? Finally – and perhaps the most pertinent question – what will the cost of doing so be?


Technologies That Enhance The Human Experience

Human-enhancing technologies tend to be grouped under the all-encompassing term ‘Human Enhancing Technologies’. These do not refer to technologies and tools that treat illness and disabilities, but rather enhance our physical and cognitive abilities past what is realistically biologically possible.

One example is Lockheed Martin’s Human Universal Load Carrier (HULC). This hydraulic-powered exoskeleton was developed at the University of California, and aims to enhance the endurance, strength and speed of soldiers on the battlefield.


It allows soldiers to carry weights of up to 90 kilograms (200 pounds) whilst running at a top-speed of 16 kilometers (10 miles) per hour for extended durations. Although the HULC is still in an early stage of its development, it seems almost certain that this endurance, strength and speed enhancing technology could eventually find itself onto the battlefield, not only transforming the capacities of soldiers wearing it, but also potentially giving the US military a real, tactical edge.

One doesn’t have to stay in the military field to see how HETs can allow us to exceed our biological limitations. Take, for example, the latest piece of wearable technology from Google – Glass Google Glass Review and Giveaway We were lucky enough to get a pair of Google Glass to review, and we're giving it away! Read More . Although it is still far from being a mature product, Glass has demonstrated how it can rapidly enhance one’s cognitive abilities past what is considered normal.


It has been dubbed the ‘Transhumanist’s Swiss Army Knife’, and for good reason. Glass allows users to communicate in languages they’re not familiar with, to ‘offload’ their memory to Google Glass for later recall, and to view meaningful information about their surroundings in their peripheral vision.

And then there are technologies that, although they are nothing more than a distant speck in the horizon, present an encouraging avenue for significant human enhancement. Technologies such as human genetic engineering, may be used in the near future to enhance our capabilities beyond what is biologically tenable.

Animal testing has already shown that subtle tweaks to a genetic makeup can result in increased physical performance. Researchers at the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne in Switzerland have been able to exponentially increase the strength of mice by genetically suppressing an inhibitor called NCoR1, which resulted in greater muscle growth, improved muscle density, and larger amounts of mitochondria.

The human application of this is still somewhat speculative. Despite that, it remains a probability that one day we could adapt gene therapy and genetic engineering in order to make one live longer, become more intelligent, or able to perform significantly demanding physical tasks.


HULC, Google Glass and human genetic engineering each compliment one of the factors in Prof. Al-Rodhan’s Neuro P5 list. And as one might expect, public enthusiasm and interest for these transhumanist technologies is huge, and looks set to become a significant part of the world in which we live.

Transhumanism truly does seem to be inevitable, and has a capacity to change our lives and our potentials. But what does this mean for the evolution of our species?

Transhumanism, Evolution And You

Darwinian evolution by means of natural selection is by far the most convincing explanation for the origin of our species. It can be concisely explained as descent with modification. As genes are passed down, ‘errors’ are made. The genetic changes which are best suited to an environment are retained, as they contribute to the survivability of the carrier.


But what about evolution through ‘unnatural selection’, as National Geographic puts it. It seems that our natural, biological evolution simply cannot keep pace with the dizzying array of human enhancing technologies that emerged, and have shaped how we think, and our physical capacities.

It could be argued – as it was in Smithsonian magazine – that we have become the engineers of our own evolution. Citing developments in nootropics, genetic manipulation and nanomedicine, the case was made that we are approaching the precipice of being able to effectively shape our own species through artificial means, effectively supplanting our biological processes.

It’s also been hypothesized that human enhancing technologies will circumvent or undermine thought processes and instincts that developed as a result of our biological evolution. In ‘Inevitable Transhumanism’, Prof. Al-Rodhan wrote:

“The use of technologies to modify our emotions, our bodies and our neurochemical balances, is bound to undermine and alter the instincts that have developed over millions of years in the process of human evolution and was pivotal to our survival thus far.”

The transformative effect technology has had on the development of our species cannot be denied. Despite its promise, there are a number of concerns about transhumanism, and what it means for the human experience, and the future of the human race.

Concerns About Transhumanism

The Transhumanist movement is not without its share of detractors. The concerns about it are diverse, as are the detractors themselves. And they don’t mince their words.

Take Francis Fukuyama , a well-known American political scientist. In an op-ed for Foreign Policy Magazine, he described transhumanism in no uncertain terms as the ‘World’s Most Dangerous Idea‘.

He is best known for his ‘End Of History’ thesis which postulates that the evolution of human governance has stopped due to a lack of necessity, since we have reached the pinnacle of our political and economic evolution. Its main argument is that Western liberal democracy and free-market economics is the most perfect system to rule by, and has regularly and historically demonstrated to be a better system than anything else, including communism and authoritarianism.


The success of countries that have adopted a liberal democratic system of governance are so successful, and so developed they have effectively signaled the final form of human government, as there is nothing else that could possibly surpass it in terms of its economic success, and its ability to ensure political representation for the masses and social cohesion.

Fukuyama has a number of concerns about the move towards human enhancement. The first is that it could fundamentally reshape human nature, the outcome of which could be impossible to predict. Another concern is that it threatens one of the fundamental tenants of liberal democracy: the absolute equality of people, regardless of their status, color, class or ability. In the same piece, he asked:

‘If we start transforming ourselves into something superior, what rights will these enhanced creatures claim, and what rights will they possess when compared to those left behind?’

These are difficult questions, but ones that seemingly have an answer. Prof. Al-Rodhan reconciles transhumanism with human rights and dignity with his ‘Sustainable History’ thesis, where he argues that the stability and longevity of any political order relies entirely upon a guarantee of dignity for all citizens, at all times, and under all circumstances. Al-Rodhan insists that moral, ethical and legal global guidelines are urgently needed to make sure that these technologies are used correctly.


Therefore, any technological advancements that would result in the improvement of the cognitive and physical abilities of some would not result in the marginalization of others, as it would eventually result in the disastrous unraveling of society.

‘While dangers to human nature, dignity and destiny are real, I am not suggesting that technological innovations and the potential for enhancement should be halted or stifled. I am instead calling for urgent global action at the UN level to define international moral and bioethical guidelines on what potential enhancements are acceptable to our global societies and on what terms.’

He also raises the concerns that there are some significant challenges to be addressed and soon: for example, who gets enhanced, who has the right to decide, and do adults have the right to choose their own babies attributes. Are these choices determined by economics, politics or ethnic and ideological persuasions? These are all very serious considerations that must be addressed before humanity goes along that inevitable path to make sure that the dignity of all is maintained in this brave new world.

Others are concerned that any change in our biological limits would result in the undermining of the human experience, and render our existence devoid of meaning. This argument has been made by the Californian environmentalist and ethicist Bill McKibben, a noted and fierce critic of transhumanism.


In his book ‘Enough: Staying Human in an Engineered Age‘ he argued that human limitations – such as mortality – exist for a reason. He believes that to remove them would result in making human life meaningless, and that removing our biological limitations would also remove the necessary context in which we make meaningful choices about our life.

This argument is a convincing one, albeit one that makes a significant number of assumptions about what a technologically enhanced life would look like. Firstly, it assumes that such a life could not possibly have meaning.

I find that hard to swallow. Surely a person with an artificially enhanced life-span would still be able to find meaning in doing the activities that person enjoys, and in spending time with loved ones? One might also find meaning and pleasure in using one’s enhanced abilities to accomplish tasks and solve problems they find to be particularly challenging.


There are countless other arguments surrounding transhumanism. These stretch from the belief that one should not play God, to the prediction that a transhumanist future would result in such enhancements only being available to the wealthy, whilst the poor would be left behind.

These arguments are hard to respond to. Perhaps the only real answer is to wait and see what happens when our technological capacity catches up with our ambition to rebuild the human.

Excited About Your Transhumanist Future?

It’s hard not to be excited about a future where one can be engineered to be smarter, stronger and healthier. This future seems inevitable, as our human nature pushes us towards self-improvement by any means possible. With that said, many are concerned about the transformative effect transhumanism would have on human society, and its implications for human rights and governance.

The debate surrounding transhumanism will rage on. With that said, I’m willing to bet that our future will be an enhanced one.

But what do you think? I’d love to hear your thoughts. Leave your comments in the box below.

Photo Credits: Head with cables Via Shutterstock, Ken Leach (UC Davis)Francis Fukuyama (Andrew Newton), Bill McKibben (University Of Michigan)Nicku / Shutterstock.com

Related topics: Futurology, Geeky Science.

Affiliate Disclosure: By buying the products we recommend, you help keep the site alive. Read more.

Whatsapp Pinterest

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Seeker of Truth
    March 7, 2017 at 5:23 am

    Thanks also for posting this. Great info

  2. Seeker of Truth
    March 7, 2017 at 5:19 am

    Great article. I was looking up some info due to the fact I have seen this happening for real as of 2016....and yeah it seems very real and rolled out for usage. I used to joke that when i was in the military they did many things to me that maybe I was not aware of until many years later... I don't know what implants or enhancements were done. But my life as of 2016 seems more like a scene from Deadpool mixed with the Matrix, and Minority Report. If anyone would like to talk more I am at Rezorec2k@gmail and would love to know other opinions or experience.

  3. Brooklyn
    September 23, 2016 at 6:53 am

    I agree with some of this although i do beileve while some may think we are advancing due to technology we as human beings are losing the physical connection between eachother. Sure we are connected 24/7 to those we know but at what cost we as people are more worried about the social life on the internet that you couldnt go anywhere without seeing someone buried nose deep into their phone. Alot of relationships for example are broken because of the small things that are said on the internet and thats just the beginning i remember as a kid going to a friends house and physically knocking on their door to get them to come outside or telling someone else to relay the message so that i may hang out with friends.. sure now its more convenient being that most of the people in this world now have some means of communication on them at all times in which they can be contacted at but when you do meet up what usually happens ? When a person gets bored or their phone pings a notification sound they most likely immediately pick up their phone ...sure im guilty of doing it sometimes but i choose to not pick up my phone and try to enjoy the world in which most people miss because they are to preoccupied by digital distraction. I came up with this thing when my friends and i go out for a drink or dinner or what ever the case is for that time we all put our phones in the middle of the table and if you grab your phone before the night is through you pay the entire bill and trust me noone wants to pay a bill for 5+ people ..it works everytime although it may sound weird beileve it or not we always have a great time cathing up and making jokes and laughing with eachother not over a screen . They say technology is advancing but to me personally in my opinion it is creating a barrier between people somewhat of a brainwash tool to keep people busy because what i have noticed in life so far is that we as human being become bored of things real fast which is why we are always coming up with new thing to keep us occupied. .what happened to talking? Sitting on the stoop listening to music? Meeting new friends by going out and exploring? Idk about you guys but i have an old sould and kind of wish people would wake up and see most of our days are taken up by our technology. . Do you ever wonder what else is going on in the world? You cant always beileve everything you see on the internet sometimes you have to find out for yourself ..just the anticipation of trying to learn something new should be a rush in itself instead of using google to find out what it feels like , how it smells, how it tastes etc. Etc. Youget the jist of it

  4. Neil Whyte
    July 17, 2016 at 11:10 am

    Matthew. No, please don't overpopulate Australia like other places on Earth, ha ha. Actually, we are building anyway, ha ha.

    Don't give a stuff about this Trans-human crap because humans today haven't even mastered the basics first of loving the planet, themselves and other humans.

    We aren't living longer - we are sicker than ever, with disease coming out of our eyeballs, and modern medicine is a major culprit and our lifestyle choices.We have lost our common sense.
    We don't even want to know the facts that people are healthier when Doctors go on strike or vaccines that have been made up like Alice in wonderland.

    If Trans -humanism involves regaining our common sense, I am interested.

    Failing that, master the basics first, then I may be interested in the next phase.
    ps - in terms of population, consult Bill Gates, he has a great plan for this.

  5. c o n f u s e d
    April 7, 2016 at 8:00 pm

    h e l o?

    • c o n f u s e d
      April 7, 2016 at 8:01 pm

      w h e r e a m i?

  6. elissa sangi
    December 17, 2015 at 2:46 am

    This is wonderful. In the name of science and future technology, the human body can be manipulated, cloned, enhanced, but there's nothing saying human beings will have active participation in their own transhumanism. Everything points to this being covert and experimental to humans, which is against the Nuremburg Laws, of using humans as subjects for experimentation, without their knowledge. OK so in the light of ALL this, why is it illegal for humans to consume drugs? Any drug they choose? There's no difference between one and the other, only that the individual human being is using the drug of their choice. We used a small portion of what we know about intravenous drug users, by offering syringe exchanges, iz legal to buy syringes and the %'ge of AIDS contracted through intravenous use has come way down. So have the numbers of Hep C victims. It is about time, drugs were legalized as they once were, especially if transhumanism has already invaded the populus.

  7. Anonymous
    August 15, 2015 at 11:41 am

    i wonder what evolution would be like without transhumanism or the medical industry? just think about it... technology can easily fail us...

  8. Alex
    September 9, 2014 at 2:11 pm

    Really? You want to see humans "take better advantage" of the last unspoiled unpopulated places on Earth? Why?

    • Matthew H
      September 9, 2014 at 6:17 pm

      I think it's possible for small-size settlements to exist in these places without causing overcrowding and environmental damage. Obviously, there would have to be some pretty clever engineering with respect to how they generate energy without using polluting (and nasty) fossil based power sources, but it's possible. ;)

  9. Dinika
    August 30, 2014 at 4:56 pm

    I really don't mean to be disrespectful but the critics of trans-humanism come across as thoroughly pessimist people. I mean a person who names his thesis 'End of history' and call trans-humanism 'World's most dangerous idea' reminds me of all those strait laced people who've feared and violently countered revolutionary ideas. Trans-humanism isn't yet a fully developed reality and we already have a full blown army of critics ready to foment the masses and slander all those who are at least trying to advance the human life instead of sitting back and calculating how worthless human life is becoming and releasing scary theories on the high possibilities of total perishment of our kinds. I simply can't understand how a person could live in this age where technology can make the difference between two continuous months seem like difference between ages (technology wise) and still think that "we have reached the pinnacle of our political and economic evolution". There's just so much more left to be resolved and discovered. For the fear of inventing something with potential dangers we just can't stop the whole process of innovation and deprive ourselves of all those magical creations that technology may introduce in times to come.

  10. Kevin M.
    August 29, 2014 at 1:54 pm

    The future is going to show us what the term freak really means!

    • Matthew H
      August 29, 2014 at 3:35 pm

      I think Lady Gaga has already gone there.

    • Ryan D
      August 30, 2014 at 5:21 pm

      Kevin - the term "freak" constantly changes along with social norms and cultural acceptance of certain ideas. Many "freaks" in the 1800's are no longer considered a freak today, for example. Women who stood up for their own opinions in public were once considered freaks.

    • John R.
      July 14, 2017 at 5:47 am

      Brave New World.

  11. Bniedem M
    August 29, 2014 at 9:25 am

    Just a very basic thought:
    What if we extend our life and live up to the age of, say, 200 years?
    Would there not be a problem with overpopulation?
    Just a thought!

    • Matthew H
      August 29, 2014 at 3:34 pm

      That's a very good point. Although, I imagine that could be remedied with decreasing birth rates (richer, healthier countries almost always have lower birth rates than countries without), and interstellar travel and colonization.

      Personally, I'd like to see us take better advantage of the undeveloped, wide, barren spaces. There's a lot of room to live in Iceland, Greenland, North Africa and Australia.

  12. J R Celoni
    August 29, 2014 at 1:55 am

    IMHO relevant book: The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains, by Carr (theshallowsbook.com), a balanced treatment of how technology has affected us practically from prehistory.

  13. Alpha
    August 28, 2014 at 7:08 pm

    Humans are getting weaker by relying more and more on machines whatsoever. I'm not saying that one day machines would some day take over decision making. What I'm saying is the human race is getting weaker because of staying away from using their bodies.

    This weakness is not genetic but as long as everything that could be done by hand is done by a sort of machine, humans would generally remain physically weak.

    • Matthew H
      August 29, 2014 at 3:33 pm

      I guess it depends on your definition of 'weaker'. Surely a technologically enhanced body is by definition stronger, more robust and more able than one that isn't?

    • dragonmouth
      August 29, 2014 at 10:36 pm

      Would you consider a cyborg to be human?

    • Matthew H
      August 29, 2014 at 10:37 pm

      That question aimed at me or Alpha, Dragonmouth? ;)

      My answer: It depends.

    • Alpha
      September 1, 2014 at 12:22 am

      A cyborg according to the Oxford Dictionary is a 'fictional' being and not real. We haven't yet been able to fuse human nerves to it's own body's mechanical parts let alone to a limb made of titanium.

      These mechanical additions or attachments run on batteries. For a soldier on an extensive guerrilla warfare trip to somewhere around the world they can run
      low on battery. What then if he's not strong enough to remain on his own?

      He'd probably detach the attachments while crying and kiss them goodbye along with his own life!

    • dragonmouth
      September 3, 2014 at 12:01 am

      "A cyborg according to the Oxford Dictionary is a ‘fictional’ being and not real."
      I was asking for your opinion, not the dictionary's.

      "We haven’t yet been able to fuse human nerves to it’s own body’s mechanical parts let alone to a limb made of titanium."
      Actually nerves are being reconnected in many operations. Haven't you heard of severed limbs being successfully reattached?

      There are projects that connect prosthetic limbs directly to the nervous system. I know of at least one project in which paralized people's nervous systems are wired into exo-skeletons which allow them to walk again.

      There is also a project in which blind people are given their sight back by rewiring their brains. Granted, it is rudimentary since the patients can only see shapes in black and white. But to people who have been totally blind for decades, that is big progress.

  14. dragonmouth
    August 27, 2014 at 8:06 pm

    "He (Fukuyama) is best known for his ‘End Of History’ thesis which postulates that the evolution of human governance has stopped due to a lack of necessity, since we have reached the pinnacle of our political and economic evolution."
    That sounds very much like the statement "Everything that can be invented has been invented" that is attributed to Charles Duell, Commissioner of the US Patent Office. If Mr. Fukuyama actually believes that then he is woefully out of date. Political and economic evolution, just like invention, continues.

    "The first (concern) is that it could fundamentally reshape human nature, the outcome of which could be impossible to predict."
    That is a straw man put up by someone who fears losing control over people. One could express the same concern about the results of evolution. No one can predict where evolution may take humanity, especially if mutations occur along the way.

    "Another concern is that it (transhumanism) threatens one of the fundamental tenants of liberal democracy: the absolute equality of people, regardless of their status, color, class or ability."
    Unfortunately, "liberal democracy" does not exist in the real world. It is an abstract ideal that exists only in the imagination of the Political Correctness adherents. In practice, people were not created equal and they will never be equal. Some are taller, some are shorter. Some are larger, some are smaller. Some are more intelligent and some are less. Each person has their own set of abilities. To homogenize humanity into a grey slurry of sameness is to deny the unique attributes that allowed humanity to progress as far as it has.

    Having said all that, I do however agree with Mr. Fukuyama that "transhumanism is in no uncertain terms the ‘World’s Most Dangerous Idea." Who gets enhanced, who has the right to decide, and do adults have the right to choose their own babies attributes? Are these choices determined by economics, politics or ethnic and ideological persuasions? It is quite easy to imagine, in fact it is a virtual certainty, that The Powers That Be appropriate for themselves and their sycophants both the enhancements and the right to determine who else and how much.

    • Matthew H
      August 29, 2014 at 3:32 pm

      I take issue with your argument that 'liberal democracies don't exist'. They do. I've lived in one. A little country called Switzerland. You may have heard of it. ;)

      With respect to your last point, I do agree. Which is why we need to have transparent, well thought-out legislation on the limits of transhumanist technologies.

    • dragonmouth
      August 29, 2014 at 10:33 pm

      "I take issue with your argument that ‘liberal democracies don’t exist’. They do. I’ve lived in one. A little country called Switzerland."
      Equality, or at least the practice of it, is not part of human psychology. Humans will always find a differnce and exploit it in their favor. If they can't find a difference, they will invent one. "Liberal democracy" like "scientific socialism" is an abstract. Switzerland may be the country that comes the closest to abstract but I suspect that even a perfunctory examination will show stratification along class, education and/or income lines. I'll grant you there may be equality before the law, however, I think that a closer scrutiny will prove otherwise.

      "Which is why we need to have transparent, well thought-out legislation on the limits of transhumanist technologies."
      Unfortunately, you are forgetting about the Golden Rule - He who is in control, makes the rules. It is against the nature of lawyers and politicians to be transparent.

    • Matthew H
      August 29, 2014 at 10:48 pm

      And yet Switzerland has nearly free (extremely high quality) education, virtually no long-term unemployment, and direct democracy. Tell me how it's not a liberal democracy. ;)