Gaming Tech News

Steam Tries to Stop Haters Review-Bombing Games

Dave Parrack 20-09-2017

Valve is attempting to make Steam’s user reviews of games more useful. It’s doing this by trying to lessen the effect review-bombing has on certain titles. And it’s hoping to achieve this by adding a histogram showing the ratio of positive and negative reviews over the life of the game.


User reviews can be an extremely useful tool when deciding on a purchase, especially on Amazon. Unfortunately, user reviews are open to all kinds of abuse Ignore These Five Kinds Of Online Reviews Online reviews can be a great way to decide if something is worth paying but, even if you avoid the dodgy reviews, there are plenty of other kinds you should ignore. Read More , including review-bombing. This, for the uninitiated, is when multiple people leave negative reviews to skew the score over something other than the quality of the product they’re reviewing.

Valve Wages War on Review-Bombing

Rather than stand idly by, Valve is now waging war on Steam review-bombing, with Alden Kroll explaining the company’s motives in a Steam Community blog post. Valve isn’t removing suspect review scores, or even putting a temporary lock on reviews. Instead, it’s introducing a histogram showing the ratio of positive and negative review scores over time.

This histogram means that users can instantly see whether a game’s score is being skewed because of an organized campaign. That is if anyone actually bothers to do their homework. The score will remain skewed as a result of the review-bombing, at least until it potentially corrects itself.

This move appears to have been prompted by a review-bombing of Firewatch. Controversial YouTuber PewDiePie reportedly used a racial slur against another player during a livestream of PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds. The internet then had its thing to get outraged over for that day.

One of the people who got outraged was Sean Vanaman, of Firewatch developer Campo Santo. The developer filed a DMCA takedown of PewDiePie’s Firewatch stream as a form of retaliation for his bad behavior. Which didn’t go down well with some Steam users, who then gave Firewatch a barrage of negative reviews as a result.


Unfortunately Most Humans Are Lazy

Valve clearly had several options open to it to lessen the effects of review-bombing. These histograms are a good idea, but they rely on people actually delving a little deeper than just looking at the overall score and making a purchasing decision 11 Tech Purchases You Won't Regret Making Buyer's remorse is no fun -- but with these 11 tech purchases, you won't have anything to worry about. If you're on the fence about any of them, it's time to buy. Read More based on that. Which, given that humans are invariably lazy, could be a problem. And Valve itself is too lazy to enact human moderation.

Do you buy games through Steam? Do you read user reviews? If so, how much trust do you place in them? Do you see review-bombing as a pain in the rectum? Or a legitimate form of protest? Do you think histograms are the answer? Please let us know in the comments below!

Related topics: Steam, Video Game Review.

Affiliate Disclosure: By buying the products we recommend, you help keep the site alive. Read more.

Whatsapp Pinterest

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. dragonmouth
    September 21, 2017 at 12:43 pm

    "how much trust do you place in them? (user reviews)"
    Very little. Reviews can be manipulated both negatively and positively, making them mostly meaningless. If a product is bad it SHOULD be review-bombed. A company banning negative reviews rather than fixing the product is not the way to go. Neither is stuffing the ballot box with bogus positive reviews.

    • PSadlon
      March 2, 2019 at 5:10 pm

      I agree with you up to a point. At the same time, some people also post negative reviews just to crap on something regardless of its quality with both games and other forms of media. I don't feel that the way to go either.