Linux Mac Windows

Stay Connected To IRC Chat 24/7 Using Quassel

Dave Drager 24-11-2009

QuasselBack in the 1990’s, the only “instant messenger” system in use was IRC How to Create Your Own IRC Chat Channel IRC has been around since 1988 and is liked by many for its simplicity. Learn how to create your own IRC channel. Read More chat. Its use actually predates the web and the http protocol. IRC is still going on strong today – it is used by countless groups including developers, businesses, hackers and everyone else in between. Since it is such an established protocol, there are tons of clients out there. I wanted to feature one that really stands out of the pack – Quassel.


What makes Quassel IRC different is its client/server architecture. A typical IRC chat client is just that, a client. When you disconnect your client or end your program, you are disconnected from IRC. Quassel really brings IRC chat to the next level. It splits your IRC client into two parts – the “client” and the “core”. The core is actually what connects to the external IRC servers – your client simply connects to the core and from there, you access IRC networks.


So why bother with a 24/7 client? It is very beneficial to catch up on what has been going on since the last time you connected. For developers this means that you can see past discussions, for business it lets you keep up on what is going on. There are many reasons. However I think you will agree with me that once you learn about 24/7 IRC chat, you won’t want to go back to the old ways.

First you download the “core” application on a PC that you leave running all of the time. This PC can be a server or it can be a regular computer that you leave on 24/7. I have this running on a server in a data center so that the connection to the internet and server uptime are rock solid. They have both the core and client available for Windows, Linux and Mac – also the source code is freely available.

After running the core, you have your client to setup and configure. All configuration of the ‘core’ server is done via the client on another PC (or on the same PC, it does not matter at this point which computer the client is running on). Upon first connection to the server, it will give you the option to “Launch Wizard” to setup the core.



Once your Quassel user is set up, you can authenticate to the core. Next up will be setting up your identity. Later on you can even have separate identities for each IRC chat network that you connect to! For now, enter your username and other information and continue. By default it will connect you to Freenode but you can connect to any network you want, or multiple IRC networks.

For added security between your client and core, you can encrypt the connection. Quassel core has SSL capability added in, or if you have a Hamachi Creating Your Own Personal Virtual Private Network with Hamachi Read More network set up you can use the IP address of your Core server for the hostname (the port is 4242).

I’ve been using Quassel for over a year now and it is definately a project to watch. mIRC is the most popular IRC chat client, but I’ve found that Quassel is just as good, and as stable. It is a great way to manage your connections to multiple IRC networks while maintaining your connectivity. It is being actively developed so look for more features such as scripting coming out soon!


And just to address the command line lovers out there – I wanted to note that this has been possible for a long time on the command line side using something like screen and irssi. However the ability to have a remote, stable connection for GUI users has been a long time coming.

Do you use Quassel? Or do you have another preferred IRC client? Let us know all about it in the comments.

Get: Quassel.

Related topics: IRC, Online Chat, Web Server.

Affiliate Disclosure: By buying the products we recommend, you help keep the site alive. Read more.

Whatsapp Pinterest

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. summerside
    November 26, 2009 at 10:24 am

    Yupe, an outstanding client. That doesn't even have DCC support. And a GUI one at that. You don't use a CLI app to edit an image, but this is IRC we're talking about. Sorry but a cli one is much more convenient and reliable, and you don't always have GUI in your environment.
    I'm personally fine with people using mIRC because they might have too many scripts they can't bother to rewrite and rely too much on it. But this new client is simply just lame, it fails to offer the flexibility and numerous features that an IRC client should have. And scripting, wth ?
    Irssi can act as a proxy for other clients too.

  2. geeknik
    November 24, 2009 at 10:35 pm

    I use xchat to stay connected 24/7 with no problems. :)

    • Varun Singh
      December 12, 2015 at 8:49 am

      Can you tell me how ?

  3. oranges2
    November 24, 2009 at 6:38 pm

    Also, I would like to mention that you say "the ability to have a remote, stable connection for GUI users has been a long time coming", when bouncer/BNC software does exactly the same thing, is used widely, and has been around as long as IRC as a protocol has.

  4. Brian
    November 24, 2009 at 5:45 pm

    Well, if you're specifically talking about Instant Messaging, AOL had IM's back into the late 80's/early 90's. Granted it was on a closed network, but it still was IM...

    I'm just giving you a hard time. I liked the article. :D

  5. somenam123
    November 24, 2009 at 5:43 pm

    good to see this irc client, irc rawks

  6. Brian
    November 24, 2009 at 3:33 pm

    "Back in the 1990’s, the only “instant messenger” system in use was IRC chat." Well... not entirely true. AOL had their IM already as did Compuserve and man local BBS's. They were just on closed systems and not part of the 'net. :D But I'm dating myself with that... :D

    • Dave Drager
      November 24, 2009 at 3:53 pm

      You are right - ICQ debuted in ~ 96 and AIM ~ 97. I would argue until then IRC was the most widely used 'chat' network on the internet.

      • oranges2
        November 24, 2009 at 6:33 pm

        BBS' were unarguably more widespread than IRC during that time period...