Product Reviews

Rover 2.0 App-Controlled Wireless Spy Tank Review and Giveaway

Danny Stieben 18-03-2014

Are you trying to catch a family member or pet in the act to doing something nefarious? Do you need a cool, high-tech, smartphone-controlled toy? If so, a wireless spy tank seems like the perfect solution to both of those questions. Not only could it be useful, but you be sure to have a little fun in the process.


Naturally, we were a bit skeptical, so what better way to find out if it’s any good than to buy the Brookstone Rover 2.0 WiFi Spy Tank ($119.99) for ourselves and test it out! Best of all, you’ll be able to win it by reading this review all the way until the end and joining the giveaway.

About the Rover 2.0

The Rover 2.0 is a wireless spy tank (and remote-controlled toy) which comes with a visible-light camera as well as an infrared camera. It is controlled by a smart device app for iOS and Android via ad-hoc WiFi — the toy creates its own WiFi network rather than using your home’s network, and this means it’ll work anywhere, not just within the confines of your house. Besides being cool and relatively high-tech, it also boasts a handful of other features, which I’ll cover in detail below.

brookstone rover 2.0 wireless spy tank review


The only other product that’s similar to the Rover 2.0 wireless spy tank is the similarly-named i-Spy WiFi Spy Tank, which you can nab from Amazon for $89.95. It comes with most of the same features, although it does seem to be missing two-way sound communication and compatibility with Android devices.

brookstone rover 2.0 wireless spy tank review


If you’re looking for something more sophisticated, and can fly, check out the Parrot AR.Drone 2.0. on Amazon. At $299.99 it’s a lot more expensive but its higher resolution camera records 720p video. We bought one and reviewed it Parrot AR Drone 2.0 Review and Giveaway The Parrot AR Drone 2.0 is the most expensive remote control toy money can buy; it’s a smartphone controlled quadrocopter with a 720p HD camera, and it’s ridiculously fun, but quite temperamental. What follows is... Read More ; check it out, the review should give you an idea of how this thing performs.

brookstone rover 2.0 wireless spy tank review


The Rover 2.0 Wireless Spy Tank comes with the following specifications:

  • App-controlled via any iOS or Android device
  • Built-in night vision
  • Stream and record live video and stills (at 320 x 240 pixel resolution) and upload to Facebook, Youtube and Twitter sites right from the smartphone application
  • Wireless range up to 200 ft unobstructed; 100 feet with obstructions (walls)
  • Connects via ad-hoc WiFi
  • Two-way sound communication
  • 8x AA-battery operated
  • $119.99


There’s not much that comes with the tank, surprisingly. Squished between two pieces of egg carton-like packaging is the tank itself, the detachable antenna, and an 8-pack of AA batteries. What I find missing from this packaging is a small screwdriver that works with the screws that keep the battery bay door shut — I had to find my own screwdriver to put in the batteries.


brookstone rover 2.0 wireless spy tank review

Initial Impressions and Setting Up

The entire tank is made out of plastic, which isn’t a surprise. However, it seems to hold up just fine so I don’t really have any complaints about it. The only thing I do have to mention is that the plastic does show off fingerprints very easily, and it’s not easy at all to clean them off.

brookstone rover 2.0 wireless spy tank review

Setup is really easy, and I’m glad that was the case because Brookstone didn’t include any reading material on how to get started. Once the batteries have been inserted, you just have to flip the on/off switch on the bottom of the tank to turn it on. Then, wait about a minute and a new WiFi network will be created, which you’ll be able to see on your smartphone’s WiFi settings page. It should be called Rover_xxxxx, with some random numbers and letters in place of xxxxx.


brookstone rover 2.0 wireless spy tank review

App Features

The Rover 2.0 spy tank is controlled using a companion smartphone app. Android and iOS versions of the app are available and has quite a number of features. Once the app is launched, the center area of the app relays what the tank sees. You’ll also notice a zoom in and zoom out button — these can be used to go anywhere from 100% zoom (normal view) to 200% zoom, which it achieves digitally rather than optically. You can then take a picture — which gets sent straight to your phone as if you took it with your camera — or a video. You can also send those videos to Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube if you’d like, but I’d only advise that if something really interesting happened while you were recording.

Both pictures and videos are recorded in an appalling 320 x 240 pixel resolution.

brookstone rover 2.0 wireless spy tank review


Aside from the video stream itself, the tank and app offer two-way audio communication. As one of its “spy” features, you can turn up the volume in the app and instantly listen to whatever is going on around in the tank’s vicinity. You can also hold down the “Talk” button in the app, and have the tank act as a megaphone — anything you say to your smart device will be heard through the speaker on the tank. It’s an alternative, yet decent way to have a conversation if you’re super lazy (but you should try to be a better person than that).

Besides video and sound, there are a few more buttons in the app.

brookstone rover 2.0 wireless spy tank review

The “Stealth” button disables the WiFi indicator at the top of the tank and turns on the infrared camera, allowing it to hide and function well in dark areas.

Clicking on the “Camera” button brings up a slider which allows you to change the viewing angle of the camera.

The Path buttons, which record and playback respectively, allow you to record a certain set of movements and then play it back. I’m not entirely sure what it’s for, but I’m certain that it will be quite useful with a bit of creativity.

brookstone rover 2.0 wireless spy tank review

Finally, the “Brights” button enables some cool green lights in the front and back, two on each side.

Besides all of this, the app has one more feature: choice of motion control. By default, you’re presented with two sliders on each side of the video feed which control the two tracks that the tank uses. So sliding both of them upwards causes the tank to move forward, slide both of them downwards to move backwards, or use a combination which will make the tank turn. Navigating the tank does take a little practice.

brookstone rover 2.0 wireless spy tank review

If you’re not a fan of controlling the tank this way, you can also tap on the “G Drive” button which is located right above the right motion control slider. This button removes the two sliders, and allows you to use your smart device’s gyroscope as a way to control the tank. Tilting the smart device backwards will make the tank move forward, and tilting forward will move the tank backward. You can also tilt the smart device to either side to make the tank turn as well.

This isn’t exactly any easier, but it’s another way of control that some people may prefer.


While the tank functions well, I do think there is some room for improvement. Like I mentioned, it’s a little hard to control the tank using either motion control method. However, like most other things, a little practice is all you’ll need.

Besides this, I don’t see why the tank requires AA batteries, as opposed to using a single, custom rechargeable lithium-ion battery. There’s a reason why rechargeable batteries are currently used in virtually every other device: you don’t have to buy new ones all the time, and they’re more environmentally-friendly. I would have loved to see a custom rechargeable battery pack with a regular microUSB port for charging. However, since it doesn’t have that, I’d recommend just getting rechargeable AA batteries (the higher the capacity, the longer they will last before requiring a recharge) and using those instead.

brookstone rover 2.0 wireless spy tank review

Also, for a tank, it doesn’t climbing over obstacles very well. Maybe I have my expectations set too high for a little toy to actually behave like a tank, but I tried it anyways. It didn’t even manage to climb over my foot.

Finally, the device fails majorly at an important part of being a spy tank: sound. Simply put, it’s not going to sneak up on anything. The electric motors that control the two tracks are rather loud, and anyone can easily hear it coming from down the hall. If it was silent, then it’d actually be very effective as a spy tank, but it isn’t.


I had high hopes for this spy tank. It is packed with a lot of features and is compatible with any smart device given it connects through an ad-hoc Wi-Fi network. Even then, the few minor downsides to the tank could be easily overcome with rechargeable AA batteries and some practice, but it’s rather loud motor announces its arrival, so I can’t call it a spy tank but just a device with a camera and wheels (well, tracks, but you get the point). If it were a silent and stealthy tank, it’d be totally legit. But alas, it’s just a toy.

Our verdict of the Rover 2.0 App-Controlled Wireless Spy Tank:
MakeUseOf recommends: Buy it if you want a high-tech toy, but it certainly isn’t a spy tank.
6 10

The Winner

Congratulations, Karen DeGraaf! You would have received an email from Please respond before April 4 to claim your prize. Enquires beyond this date will not be entertained.

Send your products to be reviewed. Contact Jackson Chung for further details.

Affiliate Disclosure: By buying the products we recommend, you help keep the site alive. Read more.

Whatsapp Pinterest

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Morrison
    March 29, 2014 at 7:30 am

    Side point: I for one would prefer AA batteries and, as Danny mentioned, using rechargeable ones, rather than a custom battery pack, if only to be able to cheaply and easily replace the bad battery/batteries when the time comes.

  2. Morrison
    March 29, 2014 at 7:25 am

    Yes. Apart from the downsides in the review, looks to be a device with many features. I am not aware of any alternatives.

  3. Diane W
    March 28, 2014 at 8:28 pm

    My husband would love to have this for fun. Good for checking on the dogs when no ones around.

  4. Phil H
    March 28, 2014 at 7:36 pm

    No. It has limited usefulness. Its a toy.

  5. Sreeraj R
    March 28, 2014 at 4:39 pm

    I wont buy a spying robot as it is very expensive

  6. Peter James Escobar
    March 28, 2014 at 2:44 pm

    Yup I'm gonna buy!

  7. Amanda S
    March 28, 2014 at 1:01 pm

    I would buy this for my niece!

  8. Angela C
    March 27, 2014 at 10:34 pm

    I probably wouldn't buy it for myself but it would make a great gift for one of my nephews.

  9. Harry. P
    March 27, 2014 at 9:07 am

    Are the actually alternatives to this mobile spy cam? I still want the tank.

  10. Bienvenido C. Masaluñga Jr.
    March 27, 2014 at 12:20 am

    Honestly I would not but it, but for free? Yes, I want to have it. :)
    I'd rather buy some new technology gadgets or equipment which is more useful.

  11. Dorothy H
    March 26, 2014 at 5:22 pm

    No, I would not buy one. Winning one would make a nice gift for a young relative.

  12. Tejash C
    March 26, 2014 at 4:06 pm

    NO! I'd rather use that money to buy some useful device!

  13. Mark Hansen
    March 26, 2014 at 1:36 am

    Could be fun to play with, but I wouldn't buy it. And if I found that I actually needed a spy tank, I wouldn't buy this one considering your review showing the terrible job it would do at actually spying.

  14. Puneet
    March 25, 2014 at 5:50 pm

    I’d probably buy a quadcopter drone .Its better than this.

  15. Mihir C
    March 25, 2014 at 5:33 pm

    Hell no! I would rather look for a new smartphone!

  16. Matthew
    March 24, 2014 at 4:20 pm

    I probably wouldn't buy it for myself because I would want to try to make my own using stuff I already have, i.e. web cams, rc car, old cell phones, etc.

  17. Simone
    March 24, 2014 at 12:55 pm

    It is interesting, but a flying drone could be a better idea

  18. Radite P
    March 24, 2014 at 10:01 am

    I'd love to have it, though not too sure to buy it. This cool and sophisticated devices should include the type of gadget, not a toy.

  19. Denise M
    March 24, 2014 at 3:27 am

    I'd get this for my brothers' kids. I know they'd love this.

  20. Stephan H
    March 24, 2014 at 12:21 am

    I wouldn't.

  21. Dave W
    March 23, 2014 at 10:02 pm

    No because the camera res is too low and the upgrade unjustifiably expensive.

  22. Jayendran
    March 23, 2014 at 9:12 pm

    Would buy as a toy

  23. Peter H
    March 23, 2014 at 6:53 am

    It might be a fun toy for 30 minutes but then what. Not a buy.
    The Drone with camera would be nice.

  24. Ian
    March 23, 2014 at 3:00 am

    Would make a cool gift; much prefer flying drone though

  25. Aaron
    March 23, 2014 at 2:59 am

    I'd probably buy a quadcopter drone. My brother has one and it's cool.

  26. DAN J
    March 23, 2014 at 1:39 am

    The tank is cool but flying is better; I would choose the Parrot AR.Drone 2.0.

  27. Keith W
    March 22, 2014 at 10:56 pm

    I might, as a gift, though something like the Parrot is more interesting.

  28. Muhammad Hadi N
    March 22, 2014 at 3:00 pm

    Maybe. because I prefer Parrot AR Drone 2.0.

  29. nitin hassija
    March 22, 2014 at 2:39 pm

    I would wanna get one if I had the money. About other products, not sure cos I cant think of any better alternative.

  30. AlSam
    March 22, 2014 at 2:21 pm

    I wouldn't buy. Have no practical use for it so couldn't justify its purchase or any of its alternatives.

  31. Valery Ramirez
    March 22, 2014 at 11:35 am

    Ofi course yes, its a nice toy with a beautifull exterior design

  32. Igor S
    March 22, 2014 at 10:52 am

    Thanks, Would love to buy

  33. Adly A
    March 22, 2014 at 4:00 am

    Maybe not. Parrot AR.Drone 2.0 is my thing.

  34. Sam K
    March 21, 2014 at 10:25 pm

    Thanks, Would love to buy

  35. Anne F
    March 21, 2014 at 5:40 pm

    Would make a good Birthday or Christmas gift for Grandsons!

  36. Paskal
    March 21, 2014 at 10:02 am


  37. Sam N
    March 21, 2014 at 8:13 am

    Yes i would love to have a mini spy tech ^^

  38. Brandon Young
    March 21, 2014 at 3:32 am

    I would use it around the house for the family to play with

  39. Jara Christensen
    March 21, 2014 at 2:39 am

    I think we would definitely get one! :)

  40. Doreen L
    March 21, 2014 at 1:01 am

    I would get one. It be a fun thing to play around with. Getting into small spaces in a great way to use it but just spying on my husband would be fun.. shhh.

  41. Adam
    March 20, 2014 at 11:32 pm

    hmmm its interesting but I would not buy it, a quad or hexacopter spy drone would be cool though!

  42. Bogdan
    March 20, 2014 at 10:39 pm


  43. Rory R
    March 20, 2014 at 9:36 pm

    I probably wouldn't buy one, but it'd be a pretty neat thing to have, maybe use it to explore places I wouldn't necessarily want to enter myself (like abandoned buildings!)

  44. Stephanie Bondlow
    March 20, 2014 at 9:23 pm

    Yes, I've loved spying on people ever since I was a little girl and had read Harriet the Spy.

  45. kathy savage
    March 20, 2014 at 5:43 pm

    my husband would love this little gadget

  46. Mark R
    March 20, 2014 at 3:38 pm

    Something neat to race up and down the corridors. Sure I'd buy it.

  47. Grigas S
    March 20, 2014 at 3:33 pm

    I would like to have a drone ,but this is really cool too :D

  48. Linda C. Crowder
    March 20, 2014 at 1:18 pm

    I don't think I would buy this product but only because I don't need it bad enough to merit spending that kind of money. I would use it as added security if I win it and would love having that. I am on fixed income is only reason I can't buy one myself. Thanks for the chance to win. It looks like a great product and has features I haven't seen in any of the others on the market similar to it.

  49. kath g.
    March 20, 2014 at 12:55 pm

    i'd really enjoy it if i had one, but i wouldn't splurge on this for myself.

  50. Francis Smith
    March 20, 2014 at 12:55 pm

    I'd like to give this too my son, he love robots and tanks. The best of both worlds.

  51. Laurence D
    March 20, 2014 at 6:19 am

    It's cool but i wouldn't buy one .. i would like a helicopter that have camera

  52. Elton W
    March 20, 2014 at 3:33 am

    A 320 x 240 pixel camera? The chinese factories must have a serious overstock of those things if manufacturers are still putting them in hardware! Even children's "toy" cameras have better resolution than that!

  53. Julian
    March 20, 2014 at 3:05 am

    Would not buy one. Loud and uses double-A batteries. Might work to distract zombies though. We'll see..

  54. Paul W
    March 20, 2014 at 1:23 am

    It looks cool and all but I wouldn't buy one. I don't feel the need to purchase it. I would like to play with it or win it here

  55. Thomas Stachelski
    March 19, 2014 at 11:56 pm

    A way cool toy! I would buy it!

  56. B-
    March 19, 2014 at 8:46 pm

    I've almost bought the 1.0 version of the Rover.. really thinking of it again. Would love to win it!

  57. Youssef Brahmi
    March 19, 2014 at 5:56 pm


  58. David Smith
    March 19, 2014 at 5:24 pm

    If I had an income and the money, I would definitely buy this tank. Something to chase (play) with the dogs with and mess with my son and my fiance with too.

  59. MattL
    March 19, 2014 at 5:12 pm

    Yeah it's cool but I probably wouldn't buy

  60. ryan
    March 19, 2014 at 3:47 pm

    Probably not as its too expensive :(

  61. Nero T
    March 19, 2014 at 2:52 pm

    I love smartphone-controlled toys, it's very fun to play and entertain. I love this tank built-in camera and two-way sound communication function, but the camera resolution is too low, and it's quite big, not as fast and versatile as Sphero.

  62. Abdelouahab Boussakka
    March 19, 2014 at 2:23 pm

    It's really cool, I would buy it if I could

  63. Isaac C
    March 19, 2014 at 2:13 pm

    Yes, only if it is cheaper

  64. Denis K
    March 19, 2014 at 2:05 pm


  65. Tawnda M
    March 19, 2014 at 1:54 pm

    I probably wouldn't buy this... not because I don't want, but I can't afford what I NEED... But it IS cool...

  66. robert
    March 19, 2014 at 12:36 pm

    price is right yes

  67. Jarvis J
    March 19, 2014 at 12:09 pm


  68. Alfred Chan
    March 19, 2014 at 11:18 am

    Depend on the price tag. :)

  69. Iain Simmons
    March 19, 2014 at 11:00 am

    Probably wouldn't buy this, I'd prefer something that flies.

  70. Tate S
    March 19, 2014 at 10:52 am

    Nope, won't do

  71. Roman Savchuk
    March 19, 2014 at 10:04 am

    i love new toys, so why not =)

  72. JeffC
    March 19, 2014 at 10:03 am

    Depends on the price.

  73. paulie
    March 19, 2014 at 9:33 am

    i love new toys, so why not =)

  74. Milos D
    March 19, 2014 at 8:29 am

    Maybe... I am not sure!

  75. Victor Obizuyk
    March 19, 2014 at 8:15 am

    this is so cool I would so love to have one

  76. Beh H
    March 19, 2014 at 8:12 am

    I will buy it only if I have money

  77. Mukola Obizuyk
    March 19, 2014 at 8:12 am

    If i have enough money to buy it… Love to have a spy gadget.

  78. Vic L
    March 19, 2014 at 8:02 am

    Looks cool! I will considered...

  79. Vitaliy P
    March 19, 2014 at 7:42 am


  80. Stefano R
    March 19, 2014 at 6:53 am

    Wow amazing! Let's hope I will finally win a giveaway! I think I have partecipated in nearly all the giveaways from the birth of makeuseof .... 100% failure rate till now -.-' :(

  81. Ionut Baciu
    March 19, 2014 at 6:32 am

    I would buy it. It's fun

  82. Madhur Tewani
    March 19, 2014 at 6:13 am

    I wouldn't buy one...

  83. Tina F
    March 19, 2014 at 5:53 am

    this is so cool I would so love to have one

  84. Junil M
    March 19, 2014 at 5:32 am

    can't think of any other alternatives for this and would not buy this. happy with giveaway.

  85. AJ
    March 19, 2014 at 5:22 am

    I would not buy a robo cam;
    Instead I would buy Turkish jam.

  86. Jitendra A
    March 19, 2014 at 5:13 am

    If I have money to spare I would definitely buy one for my Kids. Unfortunately I don't so praying hard I win this :)

  87. Raul Jara
    March 19, 2014 at 5:07 am

    I wouldn't buy it, I rather take a chance with an AR Drone

  88. Vincent
    March 19, 2014 at 4:05 am

    Definitely, if i have enough money. Just any spy gadget perhaps. :)

  89. Haravind kumar
    March 19, 2014 at 3:30 am

    If i have enough money to buy it... Love to have a spy gadget.

  90. Francis S
    March 19, 2014 at 3:11 am

    I think I'd pass on this and double down on a Parrot AR drone. Still pretty cool to harass the dog with.

  91. Jeff
    March 19, 2014 at 2:35 am

    It doesn't climbing...? Spell check promotes lazy editing. Take no offense! I see mistakes everywhere by professional writers, though it does seem a lot more common online and with the creation of the aforementioned little helper/hinderer. To me the most negative aspect would be the low resolution camera. I was surprised that wasn't mentioned in the "Downsides" section.

  92. Sheepy
    March 19, 2014 at 2:23 am

    I wouldn't buy it; I've no need for one. I'd happily play with a free one, though

  93. Fabian Moore
    March 19, 2014 at 2:13 am

    I would buy one for it looks like it would be fun to mess around with.

  94. Catherine M
    March 19, 2014 at 1:43 am

    I would buy if I had unlimited funds. I just can't think of too many reasons I personally would want one.

  95. Paula VanBuskirk
    March 19, 2014 at 1:03 am

    I really can't say as I have not played with this kind of toy in years. However, I do look forward to trying this one out for a run.

  96. Athena
    March 19, 2014 at 12:59 am

    If it were quiet I would buy it to spy on my bunnies, but right now it would scare them, so no.

  97. Andrew Baughman
    March 19, 2014 at 12:53 am

    I probably wouldn't buy it, but I'm going into robotics, so I'll still have lots of fun.

  98. Larry
    March 19, 2014 at 12:15 am

    Doubt I'd buy it but, if given it, I would enjoy it as a toy.

  99. jeff
    March 18, 2014 at 11:58 pm

    no, i wouldn't buy it

  100. Jason P
    March 18, 2014 at 11:54 pm

    I might buy it.

  101. Jonathan S
    March 18, 2014 at 11:41 pm

    No, I would not really buy this toy and other alternatives!

  102. Arie W
    March 18, 2014 at 11:14 pm

    if only it move silently :P , and that drone seems like it can do the job great :D

  103. professandobey
    March 18, 2014 at 11:12 pm

    I probably would not buy this tank, but I would buy a quadcopter or some other flying "drone".

  104. thomas ticknor
    March 18, 2014 at 10:50 pm

    I would buy it.

  105. Elisabetta S
    March 18, 2014 at 10:27 pm

    I'd maybe buy it, but i'll always prefer the quad copter.

  106. sofien boudriga
    March 18, 2014 at 10:14 pm

    i actually will buy "Parrot AR.Drone"

  107. Michael Bisceglia
    March 18, 2014 at 10:04 pm

    I'd buy one if it was cheaper, but I'd prefer a drone.

  108. Dennis Dubs
    March 18, 2014 at 10:01 pm

    I'd prefer the Parrot Quadcopter, a little more expensive but it flies

  109. Paul H
    March 18, 2014 at 9:57 pm

    I think this is just an interesting toy. Still, I could hack it...

  110. moorandro
    March 18, 2014 at 9:56 pm

    No, but have no idea of an other...

  111. ?????? ?
    March 18, 2014 at 9:46 pm

    i realy dont now

  112. Anant S
    March 18, 2014 at 9:43 pm


  113. Marko G
    March 18, 2014 at 9:41 pm

    if it was cheaper maybe

  114. Tomas P
    March 18, 2014 at 9:41 pm

    No. I would rather get a Parrot drone.

  115. Endracion
    March 18, 2014 at 9:37 pm

    If I had money to space on high tech toys, I probably would - but I expect the novelty to wear out quickly.

  116. Eibert D
    March 18, 2014 at 9:31 pm

    I would not buy it, but I would love to win it!

  117. Stephen
    March 18, 2014 at 8:59 pm

    I wouldn't buy one, but I would definitely enjoy one if I had it. I wouldn't really consider any other of the same product to actually go out and purchase.

  118. Darrell Bowman
    March 18, 2014 at 8:52 pm

    I might buy this one, but I'd have to look around. The camera on this one is lacking.

  119. Suzanne G
    March 18, 2014 at 8:47 pm

    I would buy it as I think the grandkids would love using it. Even better if I win it.

  120. niranjan
    March 18, 2014 at 8:46 pm

    its just a very cool toy for me at the moment and if I had spare cash I'd buy it.

  121. Rick
    March 18, 2014 at 8:34 pm

    If the price was lower or the features were more rugged, then I'd consider it. Would be a great toy to win and play with the nieces and nephews.

  122. Andrew
    March 18, 2014 at 8:01 pm

    I wouldn't buy this. I might consider a Parrot, if I wasn't broke.

  123. Debbie Bashford
    March 18, 2014 at 7:47 pm

    I would not buy one at this time, but would certainly use it if I won it

  124. Tom W
    March 18, 2014 at 7:46 pm

    I probably wouldn't buy this, unless they released a version that could go up stairs. Instead, I would save up a bit more and get a Parrot AR.Drone.

  125. q
    March 18, 2014 at 7:46 pm

    if it was cheaper maybe

  126. Ted W
    March 18, 2014 at 7:44 pm

    i'm sorry, but this would be a complete luxury item for me. i'd buy it if i won the lottery.

  127. Maarten D
    March 18, 2014 at 7:33 pm

    I would never buy this kinda stuff. But it would be nice to experiment with.

  128. Travis Faulkner
    March 18, 2014 at 7:32 pm

    I dont think I'd buy it because I have no use for it, but it would be fun to win!

  129. Dawn W
    March 18, 2014 at 7:31 pm

    I would definitely consider this as a gift for my boys! very cool they would love it!

  130. Dmitriy S
    March 18, 2014 at 7:29 pm

    Nope, only if I win it :)

  131. Bruce S
    March 18, 2014 at 7:20 pm

    Not a buy for me.

  132. Dan D
    March 18, 2014 at 7:20 pm

    Looks fun but I don't see how practical it would be to buy one. I could always just put a camera on my RC cars and it would be somewhat similar. I think it would work so much better on a drone or something flying instead.

  133. owsleyskdi
    March 18, 2014 at 7:12 pm

    Maybe for a gift.

  134. Mai T
    March 18, 2014 at 7:10 pm

    I'd definitely buy this cool toy!

  135. Elizabeth K
    March 18, 2014 at 7:09 pm

    I might buy it for my 12 yr old son, but I have no use for it personally

  136. Va D
    March 18, 2014 at 7:04 pm

    I think it being a tank defeats the purpose of trying to be stealthy. I would rather have a flying version so at least it can fly away if it gets seen.

  137. Hemanth K
    March 18, 2014 at 7:00 pm

    yeah i would love to buy this one.As it is wireless and used for spying :):P

  138. Thomas Nord
    March 18, 2014 at 6:58 pm

    I'd get it and just mount a GoPro on it. ;)

  139. Robert S
    March 18, 2014 at 6:56 pm

    love it

  140. Jarred S
    March 18, 2014 at 6:55 pm

    I probably wouldn't buy it due to the price, especially since while it looks like it is a lot of fun to play with I wouldn't get nearly enough use out of it to justify the price

  141. Bjørnar B
    March 18, 2014 at 6:55 pm

    i might buy it for my kids

  142. Ken
    March 18, 2014 at 6:49 pm

    Awesome, I can spy on my cats

  143. corey faibish
    March 18, 2014 at 6:47 pm

    i would def go with a qaudrocopter/drone type thing instead

  144. Lori Bahn
    March 18, 2014 at 6:43 pm

    Looks pretty neat. I would buy this. I think it would be funny to see what the pets do when we aren't home

  145. Joe G
    March 18, 2014 at 6:37 pm

    It's just a yes.

  146. Jared M
    March 18, 2014 at 6:36 pm

    Much rather get a drone. This is useless as a robot. Great as a toy. To make it more useful, it needs carrying abilities and/or arms.

  147. Chad Milburn
    March 18, 2014 at 6:35 pm

    I'd buy it if it were a little cheaper.

  148. Sergey
    March 18, 2014 at 6:35 pm

    I like it

  149. kiran
    March 18, 2014 at 6:22 pm


  150. Gilmertz G
    March 18, 2014 at 6:16 pm

    I like it. so, that means that i would buy it if i could

  151. Bill Fleet
    March 18, 2014 at 6:13 pm

    I might not get this one, unless I had crazy money.

  152. Bill
    March 18, 2014 at 6:03 pm

    maybe. If I won a lottery.

  153. Brady W
    March 18, 2014 at 5:59 pm

    Probably not, but I would be more interested in the AR.Drone 2.0

  154. John K
    March 18, 2014 at 5:13 pm

    I would like to give it to my son to play with the dog.

  155. paul
    March 18, 2014 at 5:05 pm

    interesting toy.

  156. Ed
    March 18, 2014 at 4:52 pm

    I would rather get a quadrocopter/drone.

  157. Gord M
    March 18, 2014 at 4:51 pm

    I would, even though it does not sound like a spy tank. It would still be a lot of fun to play with.

  158. Giuseppe P
    March 18, 2014 at 4:45 pm

    I would not buy it.. it's only an expensive toy

  159. Abdelrahman Y
    March 18, 2014 at 4:20 pm

    No. Drone.

  160. jlp
    March 18, 2014 at 4:05 pm

    Probably never buy it. Looks like an interesting TOY.

  161. rui
    March 18, 2014 at 3:52 pm

    Off course. Nice kids and adults toy.

  162. Eric
    March 18, 2014 at 3:48 pm

    I don't think I'd spend that much money for one, but if someone gave me one, I'm sure I'd have fun with it.

  163. Eugene Y
    March 18, 2014 at 3:34 pm

    I would buy a flying drone istead.

  164. Daniel Perez
    March 18, 2014 at 3:29 pm

    I'd consider buying this. I need to catch my dog digging holes in the yard and with the 2way coms I could reprimand him.

  165. Alex J
    March 18, 2014 at 3:20 pm

    I would probably look more into a flying drone before I bought a tank.

  166. Brianp
    March 18, 2014 at 3:01 pm

    More than I would pay for this "toy"

  167. Alessio A
    March 18, 2014 at 2:44 pm

    Mmmmh... I will probably get a drone before that :D

  168. Rob M
    March 18, 2014 at 2:41 pm

    I think it would be fun for nature watching. I dont know that I would pay that much for it though.

  169. Ed
    March 18, 2014 at 2:38 pm

    Of course - who wouldn't want a rover to keep an eye on the pets? Or maybe even drive'm nuts while you're at work? :)

  170. Antonio R
    March 18, 2014 at 2:32 pm

    I think it's a nice one to buy

  171. Antonio I
    March 18, 2014 at 2:32 pm's only a toy. I would consider buying it if it had an auto-recharge I could use it as spy-tank when I go on vacation...

  172. Dany B
    March 18, 2014 at 2:28 pm

    If I did not have other stuff I want first I would certainly buy this, it seem really fun to use.

  173. MarkTGT
    March 18, 2014 at 2:17 pm

    Yes, I'd consider it. A fun toy to try.

  174. Dario
    March 18, 2014 at 1:52 pm

    Looks very cool

  175. Kendall S
    March 18, 2014 at 1:43 pm

    i will probably get a drone before that

  176. Miguel
    March 18, 2014 at 1:32 pm

    I'll wait until it includes a Nerf cannon

  177. Hal Jenner
    March 18, 2014 at 1:20 pm

    I'd consider buying it just for fun but not for any real spying. Too noisy to do that.

  178. Nicholas S
    March 18, 2014 at 1:11 pm

    I' d consider buying something that can fly.