Companies vs. Communities: Who Makes a Better Linux Operating System?

Bertel King 03-10-2017

Linux is an operating system, but really, there is no one entity known as Linux. Instead, you download a “distribution” (or “distro”) that bundles the Linux kernel with the additional software needed to provide a complete desktop experience. These distros, which we sometimes refer to as Linux operating systems, take money and manpower to make Why Linux Is Free: How the Open Source World Makes Money Just why is Linux and open source software free? Is it safe to trust free software? What do the developers get out of it, and how do they make money to continue development? Read More .


Some distributions have a company behind them. Ubuntu, the most popular desktop Linux operating system, falls into this category. It’s hardly alone.

Others don’t have a corporate sponsor and rely on other means to stay afloat. One such distribution is Debian. Ubuntu is based on Debian Debian vs Ubuntu: How Far Has Ubuntu Come in 10 Years? Ubuntu is now 10 years old! The king of Linux distributions has come a long way since its inception in 2004, so let's look at how it has developed differently to Debian, the distribution upon... Read More , meaning most of Ubuntu’s code ultimately comes from the Debian project.

The presence of a corporate sponsor changes the structure of a Linux distro’s community. This can impact the experience you have as a user, even if you’re not an active community member. So, should you go for a distro with a company behind it, or is it better to go with one of many that don’t? Here are six questions to consider.

1. Are People Paid to Work on This?

Very few Linux distros have paid employees, with Ubuntu being one large exception. Canonical formed in 2004 with the purpose of developing and spreading Ubuntu. It makes money by selling support and additional services.

linux ubuntu advantage


Canonical has served as the open source alternative to Apple and Microsoft as a company designing a operating system for everyday folk. The company employs people to design and develop Ubuntu, maintains servers that provide software to Ubuntu and Ubuntu-based distros, and hosts websites for Ubuntu and official flavors Why Are There So Many Versions of Ubuntu? [Technology Explained] Read More . That said, Ubuntu is a community, and many contributors come from outside of Canonical.

Red Hat and SUSE Linux both take a different approach. Each sponsors a community-supported distro and provides a separate Enterprise option. You and I are likely to prefer running Fedora or openSUSE on our computers, while a major corporation with hundreds of computers would likely opt for Red Hat Enterprise Linux or SUSE Linux Enterprise.

Red Hat and SUSE Linux make their enterprise products using code from the community-supported distros (though with openSUSE, the difference is much smaller). Each employs people to support those systems for corporate clients. The Fedora and openSUSE communities are largely left to their own devices, with Red Hat and SUSE providing hosting for packages and websites.

In the end, very few distros have employees paid to explicitly work on the desktop. If you want that experience, consider Ubuntu or Pop!_OS (more on the latter later).


2. How’s the Infrastructure?

While free and open source software may be free to use, that doesn’t make it free. There are plenty of hidden costs all throughout the system. One of those is the price of maintaining servers that store and distribute all of the software we rely on. Canonical hosts software for Ubuntu, Red Hat does this for Fedora, and the same can be said for SUSE and openSUSE. These companies also host websites for these distros and many of the ones based on them.

The benefits aren’t limited to these distros. Many distros that lack a corporate sponsor base themselves on Ubuntu. On Elementary OS, the non-curated apps come from a server Canonical maintains.

linux appcenter

Without operating as a company or having a corporate sponsor, it can be challenging to come across enough money to meet costs. Who’s going to pay for hosting? How do contributors afford to take time from their jobs, and how do they encourage other developers to support the distro? Finances can be unstable, with servers being slow or sometimes going offline. Sometimes donations are enough, and sometimes they aren’t.


Large company-backed distros tend to have reliable infrastructure. It’s unlikely that you will try to download an update or an ISO file for Ubuntu, Fedora, or openSUSE and come across a server that’s out of commission. However, alternatives such as Debian and Arch Linux tend not to have this problem thanks to the sheer number of people invested in the community.

3. Can I Buy This Distro Pre-Installed on a PC?

Companies are used to interacting with other companies. There’s a shared language. There are shared concerns. When a hardware manufacturer establishes a relationship with another company to provide the software, they know what they’re getting into. They know where to direct customers for help, and they know whom to work with when they need help themselves.

This is part of the reason why Dell and System76 provide PCs that run Ubuntu (though the latter will soon switch to Pop!_OS, its own distro based on Ubuntu Pop!_OS: Should a Linux Hardware Company Make Its Own Operating System? Linux hardware company System76 has launched its own Linux operating system. This distro, known as Pop!_OS, will be preinstalled on all new System76 computers. But is it any good? Read More ). Sure, it happens to be the most popular Linux desktop operating system, but it’s also clear whom you’re working with: Canonical. For corporate clients, Dell sells servers running enterprise options from Red Hat, SUSE, and Oracle. All are well-established companies.

There are other hardware resellers that let you select your own distro, so I’m not implying that there aren’t places to buy other distros pre-installed. But many of these suppliers are selling refurbished machines, and you may find support limited only to the hardware.


4. Is This Distro Trying to Compete in the Market?

Are you someone who started using Ubuntu in the past few years and fell in love with the Unity desktop? In that case, you’re likely experiencing hurt feelings right now. The interface that you know and love is going away, all because Canonical has decided it’s financially non-viable for the company to continue investing in Unity. And from that perspective, they’re right. What we want isn’t always good for business.

The Ubuntu experience has swayed drastically over the past decade. People who have stuck it out the entire time have experienced a default desktop that began as a slightly-tweaked version of GNOME GNOME Explained: A Look at One of Linux's Most Popular Desktops You're interested in Linux, and you've come across "GNOME", an acronym for GNU Network Object Model Environment. GNOME is one of the most popular open source interfaces, but what does that mean? Read More , underwent more extensive changes 10 Applications You Must Install On Ubuntu Lucid Lynx [Linux] Read More over time, eventually switched to an in-house interface called Unity Unity Explained: A Look at Ubuntu's Default Desktop Environment If you're switching to Linux from Windows, you might choose Ubuntu. But despite it's versatility, Ubuntu comes with an unusual desktop environment, Unity. Don't be discouraged: it's simple to use! Read More , and then switched back to being a slightly-tweaked version of GNOME What Switching Back to GNOME Means for Ubuntu Canonical has announced the end of the Unity desktop. From Ubuntu 18.04, the GNOME desktop will be restored. What does this mean for Ubuntu, and its relationship with Linux users? Read More . These changes largely took place because Canonical wanted to enter the consumer market and needed to provide a unique experience that it could support.

When you’re not in it for the money, this issue is less relevant. You can continue developing an interface out of love for the project. You may not be able to devote as much time to the job Understanding How Open Source Software Developers Make Money The truth is: many OSS developers and projects do generate revenue. Read More , but you can nibble at the code indefinitely, and it doesn’t matter if only a few hundred people end up using what you produce.

Sure, interfaces can come and go, but so do entire distros. Linspire was an attempt to build a company around a Linux desktop operating system for personal computers. Development of that distro ceased by 2008. Years before, HP stopped working on its own HP Secure OS. How many people know HP ever had any interest in developing Linux?

5. Does This Distro Stick to its Values?

Free and open source software isn’t only about creating code, it’s about ideals. The free software movement says computing comes with rights, and the people who provide software should meet a certain ethical standard Open Source vs. Free Software: What's the Difference and Why Does It Matter? Many assume "open source" and "free software" mean the same thing but that's not true. It's in your best interest to know what the differences are. Read More . A profit motive doesn’t inherently conflict with the ideals of free software, but at the same time, nothing corrupts quite like money.

When you’re an entity whose purpose is to turn a profit and you have to choose between the ethically right decision and the one better for your bottom line, you’re going to have a hard decision to make. If you have shareholders to satisfy, the pressure to go after the money is even stronger.

This isn’t that prominent an issue in the Linux world, but it has caused tension between Canonical and some Ubuntu users in the past. Starting with version 12.10, Ubuntu introduced Amazon ads in the app launcher and a pre-installed link to Amazon in the dock. These stuck around until 16.04 6 Big Reasons to Upgrade to Ubuntu 16.04 A new LTS release of Ubuntu means security and stability. Whether you're upgrading or switching from Windows, let's take a look at what's new in Ubuntu 16.04 Xenial Xerus. Read More .

Canonical is a private company looking to go public. That put more pressure on Canonical to let go of parts of the business that were not profitable.

6. Is This Distro Impacted by Regional Differences?

Ever wondered why Fedora doesn’t provide proprietary codecs Why Your Music & Video Files Don't Play on Linux, and How to Fix It You've switched to Linux, but your video or audio files file won't play! Simply, your Linux version didn't come with the necessary codecs, so let's find out how to install them. Read More ? Part of the reason is out of a commitment to advancing free and open source alternatives. The other reason is that doing so could open up Red Hat to lawsuits. Red Hat is an American company subject to U.S. law. Ubuntu and openSUSE don’t ship with codecs pre-installed, though they both make it easy to download them later. These distros are affiliated with companies based in Europe.

Many distros without a company attached don’t have any form of official residence. You can think of them as global entities. Contributors come from all over, and it can be hard to determine if any country or region can be considered “home.” This can have the side effect of offering some protection. Which country has jurisdiction? And since there’s no profit being made, how much does anyone really care?

Then there’s the issue of language. Sometimes a translation is just fine The Chinese Government Has A New Linux Distro: Is It Any Good? Ubuntu Kylin is a heavily customized spin of Ubuntu Linux, built by the Chinese government, aimed at Chinese users. Unlike other government-based Linux projects, Ubuntu Kylin is actually pretty good! Read More , and other times it may leave you scratching your head.

What Other Impact Can Corporate Money Have?

Linux distros come in many shapes and sizes. The same is true of the communities that build them. Sometimes a company holds most of the power, and other times they’re happy to have a seat in the board. Then there are projects like Elementary OS, where the company steering the project, also called Elementary, consists of only a handful of people.

Do you trust a distro more if there’s corporate money behind it? Do you distrust the influence a profit motive can have? Which distro do you current run on your machine? Share your responses in the comments!

Affiliate Disclosure: By buying the products we recommend, you help keep the site alive. Read more.

Whatsapp Pinterest

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Richard Stallman
    October 30, 2017 at 6:26 am

    Linux is not an operating system. It's a kernel -- one of many
    components that an operating needs to have.

    The operating system you discuss here is GNU. I started development
    of GNU in 1984. I did it to enable users to run a computer using
    exclusively software that respects users' freedom. We call this "free
    software", or "libre software" to emphasize we are talking about
    freedom and _not_ about price.

    In 1991, GNU was nearly working, missing only a kernel. (The other
    components of GNU were in regular use, separately, on other operating
    systems.) Linux was developed in 1991 and made free/libre in 1992,
    then people fit Linux into the last gap in GNU. At that point, an
    error started spreading -- many people call the combination "Linux",
    which means not recognizing our work.

    Because we in the GNU Project started the project, and wrote the
    largest share of the code in the combined system, would you please
    give us equal mention by calling the system "GNU/Linux"?

    Regarding the name, see and

    For the history of GNU, see

    For the ethical issue of free (libre) software, see

    Dr Richard Stallman
    President, Free Software Foundation (,
    Internet Hall-of-Famer (
    MacArthur Fellow

    • Bertel King, Jr.
      October 30, 2017 at 1:36 pm

      The decision to refer to the entire operating system as Linux on this site is not up to me, but I have expressed in a different article that my personal preference would be to refer to my laptop as a GNU system rather than Linux or GNU/Linux, given that a laptop running the Linux kernel has more in common with one running FreeBSD than a smartphone or tablet running the Linux kernel.


      I have also provided an overview of the history you've provided in our article on who made GNU/Linux. Based on your comment, I don't think you will take issue with what I've written there (aside from the continued use of Linux rather than GNU/Linux), but I welcome any feedback.


      Thanks for your comment, and I appreciate all that you've done to make the free software ecosystem what it is!

  2. Jan
    October 6, 2017 at 10:38 am

    Mageia user here. I also have Debian machines.

    I'd rather use a community-based system.

    • Bertel King, Jr.
      October 30, 2017 at 1:43 pm

      Cool. What are some of the reasons why you personally prefer community-based systems?

      • Avery
        July 5, 2019 at 6:40 am

        Sorry for the revival of an old comments section, but I really liked this article and thought I'd chime in.

        I like several different distros, all for different use-cases, but if we're talking about desktop usage I find something with a widespread user base and large number of contributors the best because they tend to be the most reliable. They might not be the flashiest, have the most devout cult-following, or have the newest packages, but they can generally be counted on to work properly.

        These distros tend to also have corporate backing just because of the immenseness of their size, whether directly or indirectly. For instance, Debian might be considered a community distro, but Intel, Google and Ubuntu all contribute to their codebase among all the others (Debian cites 587 official contributors last I checked).

        In addition, vendor-specific software is more often available, such as packages for Dell, Supermicro, VMware, Jumpcloud, NVidia, Microsoft, etc. that I constantly rely upon for cross-platform compatibility in an enterprise environment. Or those for personal use, such as Google, Netflix Spotify.

        Fedora and OpenSUSE are both close seconds to Debian for me, because of all the reasons mentioned above. I am personally more partial to OpenSUSE because it's more stable (3 yr maintenance cycle as opposed to 1), it has a lot of great features for the desktop like Yast and 1-click installers, and I like what they've done with BTRFS+snapper (I am a huge beadm fan from using Solaris). But neither of these two have as much software support as deb-based OS, so that's why I usually go for Debian first.

        I view corporate backing as more of a positive than a negative due to the increased number of dev-hours that can be allocated to the project when it can be someone's real job. They're both split, too, so the community project doesn't have to resemble the corporate product in too many regards (e.g. Fedora vs. RedHat), but both can draw from one another's strengths and learn from each other's weaknesses, beyond just drawing from one another's codebase.

        OK enough ranting from me. Please correct me if I've made any mistakes. Thanks :)

  3. Gary
    October 4, 2017 at 10:03 am

    I this article just a sneaky ad for Pop!_OS ?

    • Bertel King, Jr.
      October 30, 2017 at 1:40 pm

      Not at all. I provided extra details about Pop!_OS because it's a relatively new and unknown Linux-based distro compared to others mentioned. But after seeing your comment, I do kind of see where you got that impression. I'll try to avoid that next time.

  4. dragonmouth
    October 3, 2017 at 11:09 pm

    "Who Makes a Better Linux Operating System? "
    Define 'better'.
    Do mercenary cubicle drones write better code or do coders to whom the code is a labor of love?

    "Do you trust a distro more if there’s corporate money behind it?"
    Red Hat and SUSE, probably. Canonical and Oracle, never.

    "Do you distrust the influence a profit motive can have?"
    Definitely! As the saying goes, Money Talks! Bean counters and shareholders do not give a rat's behind about the quality of a product, only how salable it is.

    "Which distro do you current run on your machine? "
    Currently I'm running PCLinuxOS. I switched to it from SimplyMEPIS when Woody Woodward retired as the developer. However, I am not entirely happy with PCLOS. I will move to antiX/MX as soon as I create a custom version with KDE.

    • Bertel King, Jr.
      October 30, 2017 at 1:41 pm

      All great points. Thanks for the response!