Calligra vs. LibreOffice: Which Is The More Productive Linux Office Suite?

Danny Stieben 17-09-2013

Is LibreOffice the only worthwhile office suite for Linux users? Possibly not, thanks to KDE’s Calligra.


LibreOffice, and its predecessor OpenOffice, have long been known as the leader in free office suites available for all Linux. While it’s certainly the most popular choice among Linux users, it certainly isn’t the only full-fledged office suite available for that operating system. Calligra is another choice for a complete office package.

With two very good choices at hand, which one do you go for? I compared these two office suites head-to-head on features, design, and compatibility to see which one is the best.


LibreOffice LibreOffice - A Free Office Suite For Windows, Linux & Mac Read More , for those how aren’t aware, was forked from OpenOffice’s code back in 2010. Sun Microsystems had the rights to OpenOffice at the time, but Sun Microsystems was bought out by Oracle – and people feared Oracle would shut down the OpenOffice community and turn the project into a closed-source one.

Today LibreOffice s commonly found as the default office suite for most Linux distributions (the only exception, generally, being distros that aim to be lightweight).

LibreOffice comes with six total applications: Writer, Calc, Impress, Base, Math, and Draw.


Design and Features

LibreOffice looks and functions similarly to Office 97 through Office 2003. It is not like Office 2007+, as it doesn’t include a ribbon user interface – nor will it probably ever. Most of the functions you find in Office are available in LibreOffice, although LibreOffice does lack some support for highly advanced or complex functions. There are also some functions that LibreOffice partially supports, in that you can create them, but they’re not very compatible between different office suites. More on that later.


One of the major downsides (still) of LibreOffice isn’t necessary it’s amount of available functions which you can carry out with it, but rather the compatibility it has with the Microsoft Office suite. It offers a very good amount of compatibility with formats that have been around for a long time, such as .rtf and .doc, but it still has issues with newer formats such as .docx.Thankfully, it’s been able to read and write to that format for a while now, so some compatibility is better than nothing I suppose. Full compatibility will never happen without actually using Microsoft Office, but LibreOffice comes pretty close.


Calligra, an office suite usually recommended for KDE Enjoy A Clean, Improved Desktop With KDE 4.7 [Linux] One of Linux's most popular desktop environments, KDE, released their latest series (version 4.7) at the end of July. This version improves on work done in previous releases by adding new features while improving performance... Read More users, is a project completely independent from LibreOffice. It was forked from KOffice, another office suite where the development has stalled. It’s safe to say that Calligra is considered to be the successor to KOffice.

Calligra comes with nine total applications: Braindump, Flow, Karbon, Kexi, Krita, Plan, Stage, Sheets, and Words. Compared to LibreOffice, this also includes a mind-mapping tool and a project managing tool – LibreOffice doesn’t come with one at all, and Microsoft Office users have to spend another few hundred dollars to get Microsoft Project.


Design and Features

Caligra’s interface is very different from Microsoft Office and LibreOffice. While the welcoming screen may seem a little familiar when compared to Office 2013, that’s where all the similarities end. A lot of formatting functions for Calligra are available on the right hand side of the window rather than at the top, so the actual editing space for the document doesn’t span completely across the screen, horizontally speaking. It also includes most of the functions that people generally need, but the feature list isn’t quite as complete as LibreOffice’s.


Sadly, Calligra’s compatibility is quite a bit worse than LibreOffice’s. General compatibility among most formats is decent but it could certainly be better. Also, Calligra supports reading .doc and .docx formats, but it doesn’t support writing to either of them. Therefore, Calligra probably isn’t the best choice if you’re going to have to deal with a lot of Microsoft Office users.


While both office suites are decent and have their own pros and cons, I have to declare LibreOffice as the winner. While I’m quite impressed that Calligra can offer a few more applications (including one for project management), it’s absolutely vital to maintain the highest amount of compatibility possible. Only LibreOffice can offer you the level of compatibility that you need to be able to work with most Office documents with as little worry as possible.

Both office suites should be installable via your respective package manager by searching for “libreoffice” or “calligra”. Most applications will also be labeled with the suite in the name; one example is “libreoffice-writer”.


Which office suite do you use? Are there any points that I missed, especially some that you believe make Calligra a better choice than LibreOffice? Let us know in the comments!

Photo Credit:

Affiliate Disclosure: By buying the products we recommend, you help keep the site alive. Read more.

Whatsapp Pinterest

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Ivan Bilimov
    July 19, 2018 at 5:44 am

    This article is useless. You are persuading us that LibreOffice is cool. I wrote a book using it. It's really evil. The Save button just erases the document (with 1kByte of '#' symbol) randomly. Even backing up the files every 5 minutes will not help you to avoid this bug. So, instead of Save I had to Save as... to a new file. This is only way to not loose your work.

    Do you really think that LO is a good choice? There are lots of features in LO, but LO itself actually does not work.

  2. Michael McNeil
    October 13, 2016 at 5:40 am

    I notice there is no way to remove or edit comments. That needs sorting. Also several comments about M$ miss the point that proprietary software will always stay ahead of people who just want the simpler things. Besides cost is none existent in companies that can offset such things in tax breaks. The article is comparing Calligra with Libre -in a 3 minute resume.

    Once you get over difficulties with Ribbon, it is a matter of control. I moved to Linux to stop worrying about viruses so there is no reason to worry about M$ Office; bigger factors for me are interfaces like KDE vss Unity (which i am never going to try) then it has become a matter of weight and speed. Libre Office can be a dog but it is a good dog most of the time. Speed is not crucial when you are writing to relax. Keeping track of your writing is.

    Most of it can be done with careful labelling but then you can't suddenly change titles like that, can you. I think I will have to go with Libre for now as I am familiar with it and still new to Lubuntu. I will go back to KDE when I get a new machine or repair my laptop as Mageia needs the RAM. But this morning I am in the mood to try Calligra Author and if that works to take it from there

  3. Michael McNeil
    October 13, 2016 at 5:05 am

    I am technologically stupid but am looking for a wring medium for authors. I ama memeber of a village writing club with mostly older users none of whom are geeky. But we would all like to write a book or two and the main problem writing a novel for amateurs is keeping track of you characters as much as the direction your tales unfold along.

    I came here hoping to find out more about alligra although using old computers I have moved from Mageia KDE to Lubuntu Xfce. Something the Windows and Android users at the group are not likely to use. I suppose I am going to go along to Libre Office my way though my retirement as interoperability is going to be needed in sharing stories.

    But I would like to try something that might lend itself to keeping ideas together as I am especially prone to misplacing files and folders. I know I can save stuff to Google Docs when i want to read and share output. How does Calligra manage that and the Xfce, compared to Libre?

  4. Scott
    June 12, 2016 at 10:31 am

    I made a living as a Tech. Compatibility with MS office is key to all the opensource Office suites. So compatibility” to Microsoft is absolutely secondary, at most. The geeks might make it secondary.


    Many in the biz world are not going to let go of MS office.

    Personally I use Linux and most all open source products. But, hey when MS is adding Bash to there system. They may be more keen in sharing Compatibility with open source suites.

    Calligra is pretty cool. Im sure in time it will get better. LibreOffice is still the best.And alot of SOHO's get along fine with it. Many are open to it as its no cost and there is plenty of folks who can support it or knowledge of it. Calligra, naa not yet. Calligra needs to add Kontact to there suite as a email and calendaring to the suite. NOW your talking a direct open source competing suite to MS office. Why LibreOffice as never added a Outlook style aspect to there suite. I'd say 90% of our biz clients relied on outlook. So it made no sense to try and sell them the idea of going Libre or Open office Let alone WordPerfect suite which LACKED a outlook feature in there system and they sure were far from opensource.

    And now MS and others are pushing the cloud programs.
    Im sure Libre is working on some kind of cloud bases of there suite. Hope so. :)
    Maybe they'll add evolution to it this time :)

  5. Noname
    May 16, 2016 at 3:07 pm

    I came here to learn about the differences between Calligra/Koffice and Libreoffice, but unfortunately the only real aspect of comparison is "compatibility".

    Compatibility ... to the proprietary and closed source file format .doc, .docx, etc. made by and belongint to the company Microsoft.

    Well yes, I can understand that some people out there who are transitioning away from evil proprietary software need to think about compatibility so that they can read their old files that they did when they where using Microsoft's proprietary products. For those, "compatibility" might be important.

    But for all other users, i.e. those users who have already switched since years to open standards, "compatibility" to Microsoft is absolutely secondary, at most.

    I put the word "compatibility" in quotes in purpose, since I want to remember that a real compatibility is not possible. Microsoft does not disclose their sources of their proprietary formats, so that nobody can be compatible to them. All of this "compatibility" is done by the free software movement and the volunteers, who try to reverse engineer the closed formats of Microsoft as good as they can.
    Their efforts should only be used so to open an proprietary file format exactly once - and then save it to an open file format!

  6. Anonymous
    July 11, 2015 at 10:26 am

    As for opening the apps, you can use the QuickLaunch with LO with speeds things up. The interesting thing is that LibreOffice starts A LOT faster on Linux than Windows, I don't know why.

  7. fran
    March 23, 2015 at 4:13 am

    i have had good luck with SOFTMaker office. This German company makes both a windows and linux version. Plus for Android tablets & phones plus windows CE.
    Their FREE version is a bit limited but they offered a recent upgrade to softmaker office Standard for $6.99 [windows] to Premium for $19.99 [windows] and $10.99 [linux].
    You can get more information at
    They do have a free trial available, to first see if the program works for someone's needs.

    Previously we were able to get the MS Office from work, for like $9.95 via the microsoft Home-use-program. But it was only one license. If you have several computers like I do, you need something for the other computers in your home. I found that Softmaker office works quite well.

  8. Nick
    December 26, 2014 at 3:28 pm

    MS Office is already pretty compatible to LibreOffice, but Bill's guys still have some work to do !

  9. Dr Dreyeth
    February 21, 2014 at 3:04 am

    I've never used a office sweet in my life, having calligra installed lasted about 30 seconds after opening calligra words, because of the big obnoxious sidebar, infact it has single handledly made me
    realize more projects need a UI quality control manager with higher authority then the author of most programs.

  10. BianL
    January 22, 2014 at 3:21 am

    I recently came across Calligra and have been trying it out on OpenSUSE 12.3. Just started trying it out. I also have on systems Corel WordPerfect X5, MS Office 2003 Professional, Lotus Symphony, LibreOffice, Abiword and Gnumeric. In my business I primarily used X5 and reserved Office to those times when I received something from a client that either had poorly structured formulas in Excel (very common), or comments in Word that nothing else seems to be able to handle. LibreOffice I do not care for as much as X5 but it is cross platform as is Abiword and Gnumeric so these 3 have and use on all OSs depending on what I am doing. On Windows for many wordprocessing related projects I use Jarte, a really nice program that builds on MS Wordpad so it will not ever be cossplatform. It will not work with Notepad.

    As I am pretty agnostic as to how a program works, I do not need to compare any program to Office. Calligra is different in that it is really a collection of programs and does not pretend to be integrated. This can be good and bad but, I find it opens faster than the suites. For most of the files I have produced in other programs I am finding no issues so far. However, I use .rtf as my default wordprocessing file. Otherwise, I tend to use either .doc if needing a more complex structure. .odf does well but is not supported in all apps, nor WordPerfect format. When a document is final, I format it in .pdf so it is locked and can be opened independent of any of the programs. This allows me to view documents originally written in Wordstar going back to the beginning of time, so to speak.

    I am finding Calligra to be interesting and as I us it, so far the wordprocessing and spreadsheet, am finding it to be pretty for most use. To date, have not found anything it can not do, though without documentation or a good help system it takes more time than the programs I use. I do like the way it works better than LibreOffice. That is a personal preference.

    My son tried it after asking him about it and finds the Author program to be good for his use and better than Office or LibreOffice as he is writing treatises, thesis and authoring tax memos. I found it to be as good as any for my authoring of tax and legal opinions and currently writing several articles with it and am finding it to be the equal of X5 that is better than Office Word for this purpose.

    The spreadsheet program is more of a mixed bag. I have found as with all the other spreadsheets, converting Excel files a challenge as Excel is so loose with formula structure while the others are more demanding. I almost always have to go back and forth with spreadsheets that were done in Excel and laden with formulas by those who are not well taught in formula structuring. Drives me nuts. Not really an issue with the programs well, I can blame MS but at the same time understand the why. I am not into pivot tables, or complex structuring, lookups about as deep as I have to go. I have a lot of Lotus 1-2-3 formatted files as the format was a standard for years going back and even forward. Never needed to convert them but with Calligra, I will if it becomes a main program.

    All in all, I find it a good alternative to Office and LibreOffice for those not needing to deal with files generated by others which is most persons or, at least those who are structured. For instance I will not accept a MS Word file requiring the submitter to send an .rtf requesting a review and changes or .pdf if a final document. I find it opens, saves and closes faster than LibreOffice and like the blank document formatting and menu system.

    Only limitation is it is not available for WIndows so it is like Office and X5 in reverse for my use.

  11. Michael F
    January 21, 2014 at 12:58 am

    People seem to be forgetting here that the majority of newer Microsoft file formats are open standards, including the most common ones, xlsx, docx, pptx, xps, etc. The older ones; xls, doc, and ppt; were not, but LibreOffice supports them better than the newer ones (macro enabled files aren't open standards either, and LibreOffice has absolutely not support for them), it seems that LibreOffice, and Calligra Suite are just being difficult (I can't really complain though, because I've made no effort to contribute). Sure Microsoft doesn't do a great job with the Open Documents standards, but they do a hell of a lot better of a job with those than Libre does with Microsoft's.

    Also, someone said something about LibreOffice being faster than MS Office, that is completely false. Try doing your own speed test. On Windows 7 Pro and 8.1 Pro all MS Office applications open about 3 times faster than their LibreOffice counterparts, and large Excel functions and sorts are about twice as fast as the same ones in Calc. Everything else I do happens sufficiently quickly in both suites that speed isn't important. Seeing as there is no Linux - be it Debian, Ubuntu, Red Hat, or SUSE (Even though they use the same packaging systems, Debian and Ubuntu are sufficiently different now that their packages are not always compatible. Same with Red Hat, SUSE, and PCLOS.) - version of MS Office as of right now that point is moot.

  12. Trinae
    September 19, 2013 at 2:45 am

    I wanted to just say a big THANK YOU for making a decision between the two. Many times I read articles like this that end with, "There is no winner, except whichever works for you..."

    Thank you, sir, for having the courage to make a decision and declaring a winner.

  13. dragonmouth
    September 18, 2013 at 1:19 pm

    Of course much of the incompatibility would go away if M$ joined the 21st century and adopted Open Document standards.

    I have been using one incarnation or another of Libre Office since its precursor, Star Office.

  14. James
    September 17, 2013 at 11:23 pm

    Other options that haven't been compared are here (on the same site!):

    • Glen
      August 17, 2017 at 1:29 pm

      excellent suite

  15. Like Fun B
    September 17, 2013 at 11:02 pm

    Honestly, for about 90% of cases, Google Docs, LibreOffice et al. are completely, 100% fine. The PROBLEM is that last 10%. I actually do complex layouts in Word that don't translate well to anything else and my co-workers live and die with the Editing Markup and Collaboration features that the other tools don't really support, and that's not even getting in to the full feature set of Excel or - and there's no helping this one - Access.

    And there is also the small matter that an entire generation of new users is only familiar with MS Office Apps that use the Ribbon-style interface. I don't have a problem with that, but if I set my GF down in front of Office 2003 or LibreOffice I know she'd be in for a bit of a shock since Office 2010 is the first version she's actually worked with.

    In any case, Google Docs works for 90% of what everyone needs and has the ridiculous added utility of being able to edit existing Office documents saved in Google Drive, so it's my go-to suggestion for a replacement.

    If that isn't good enough, it's relatively easy to find grey-market copies of various versions of MS Office. I've gotten theoretically legal (in that they come with a real COA and disc and perhaps don't pay full attention to what the license actually says) copies of Office 2007 for as little as $25. And if THAT isn't enough or doesn't work on your platform of choice, Office 365 works on absolutely anything that can run a modern web browser.

  16. SeanP
    September 17, 2013 at 7:10 pm

    Not sure which functions are missing when you say " does lack some support for highly advanced or complex functions". I am a log time MS-Office user and recently started using Libreoffice. I do stats work for my part time school work. Functions like linear regression are in LibreOffice same like MS-Office.As an example the regression function name is LINEST in MS-Office as well as LibreOffice. I am sure it is not MSFT code as they would have sued for using their code.
    Regarding the other points I see in comments.
    - Macro support: None of the MSFT languages run on other OSes, VB, C#, VBA , so that should not be an issue. LibreOffice has macro support for Python, Basic. etc.
    - Formatting again its the MSFT that is violating. LibreOffice has support for LaTex etc. which is in academic circles as well as a standard for many reasons.

    The last item MS-Office is slow like hell when compred to LibreOffice and its funny when anyone says nothing will beat MS-Office. MS-Office on Wine is faster than MS-Office natively running in Windows machine. On top of that on windows you can only run one version of MS-Office unlike Wine where you can run multiple MS-Office versions, nothing to beat that.

    Sorry about a bit of bashing but it is what it is.

  17. Dean Chia
    September 17, 2013 at 6:31 pm

    You make M$ compatibility sound like a bug. Of course it can't fully read Micro$oft. Microsoft designed it that way.

    See --> there's an excellent article by Google linked in there somewhere. Scathing and well-deserved review of Microsoft's terrible tactics. Granted, just by sheer set of features, M$ office wins. But everyone else loses. M$ doesn't share. But LibreOffice will get there eventually, and those features will be helpful to everyone from the poor student to the kid in a Third-World country. And Open Document file formats will ensure archival quality/compatibility and open access for all.

    • SeanP
      September 18, 2013 at 9:58 pm

      I was trying to find what additional features MS-Office has and really could not find. The LibreOffice wiki has a comprehensive list comparing the features and the ones that are not fully supported are things you really would not care about. e.g. Adding a watermark to a document. On the other hand there are features you wont find in MS-Office that are available in Libre/OpenOffice.

      When we don't use an LibreOffice as much as MS-Office we tend to beleive a specific feature missing but the fact is it might be there but you do it a different way. The menu system might be different on the nomenclature might be different. Its more how you do a task in one tool versus another.

  18. Jeer
    September 17, 2013 at 6:13 pm

    Nothing will ever beat Microsoft Office.

  19. TobiH8
    September 17, 2013 at 6:03 pm

    For my school work LibreOffice meets all my needs. I can create presentations, databases and spreadsheets. I can even read all the Microsoft Office documents without any problems.
    I won't buy Microsoft Office because I don't need it and - what's more important - there's no Linux version. Oh and it's closed source. ;-)

    I know LibreOffice is not as good as other Office suites but I think for most of the private and school work it is the best product. Pupils can't spend hundreds of dollars for the newest Windows and Microsoft Office version. They need the newest because the older ones don't have all the effects, fonts and functions so they'll have problems editing files from other pupils.

  20. Ed
    September 17, 2013 at 4:14 pm

    So basically you're saying they don't come up to scratch with MS Office wrt formatting and look and feel.

    There's no mention of the scritpting languages these 2 use, one huge issue with all of these Open source Office Suites is lack of VBA compatibility (macro support) and I doubt we will ever see it addressed.

  21. Daniel E
    September 17, 2013 at 3:29 pm

    “Better” IMHO depends a lot on the individual user. LibreOffice probably has more large-document features. I say “probably” because I haven't used KOffice in a while — so long a while that I hadn't even heard of Calligra :)

    Anyway, I don't remember KOffice Writer being able to

    auto-generate a table of contents
    support user-defined style sheets
    support references and cross-references

    Never used the other components of KOffice so I can't comment on them.

    Bottom line is, Calligra may be fine for smaller documents, but if you have to write long documents, with several contributors writing their own chapters, it has to be LibreOffice.

  22. michel
    September 17, 2013 at 3:25 pm

    LibreOffice's "compatibility" is still terrible. Even simple formatting gets borked if you import from or export to MS file formats. The Commenting feature is especially terrible going back and forth. If anyone needs to work on MS file formats, LibreOffice will fail them. Why don't you mention Kingsoft Office, which now has a linux version and is much better?

    • Bruce E
      September 17, 2013 at 6:30 pm

      The only real drawback I see with Kingsoft Office is that there isn't a database application as I end up needing 'em frequently and it is inconvenient as best trying to use a spreadsheet as a database. My primary Linux box with LibreOffice and my secondary machine running Windows and MS Office are the two exceptions. It is Kingsoft for the rest of them.

    • Jadon Levesque
      December 17, 2014 at 12:23 pm

      Kingsoft Office is proprietary software- Stay away from it!