<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Browser Comparison Microsoft Style</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.makeuseof.com/tech-fun/browser-comparison-microsoft-style/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tech-fun/browser-comparison-microsoft-style/</link>
	<description>Funny Geeky Videos and Pics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: awexlash</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tech-fun/browser-comparison-microsoft-style/#comment-7285</link>
		<dc:creator>awexlash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 23:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/tech-fun/?p=1189#comment-7285</guid>
		<description>Win 7 isn&#039;t a browser. it&#039;s an OS, it makes sense that it would start in that amount of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Win 7 isn&#8217;t a browser. it&#8217;s an OS, it makes sense that it would start in that amount of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lcabral</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tech-fun/browser-comparison-microsoft-style/#comment-7270</link>
		<dc:creator>lcabral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 10:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/tech-fun/?p=1189#comment-7270</guid>
		<description>Rich, Jake.... Your kidding me right? 45s to star a browser? An Operative system should took that long to boot not an application... Not  a web browser at least. it should be a 10-15s at worst case scenario
Regarding the picture/ Micro$oft propaganda, it is the worst bu11$h17 ever. First of all both Firefox and Chrome have new releases, second the only point I give then credit is in compatibility... all website builders do produce for the IE monopoly... The rest is only the typical propaganda!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich, Jake&#8230;. Your kidding me right? 45s to star a browser? An Operative system should took that long to boot not an application&#8230; Not  a web browser at least. it should be a 10-15s at worst case scenario<br />
Regarding the picture/ Micro$oft propaganda, it is the worst bu11$h17 ever. First of all both Firefox and Chrome have new releases, second the only point I give then credit is in compatibility&#8230; all website builders do produce for the IE monopoly&#8230; The rest is only the typical propaganda!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tech-fun/browser-comparison-microsoft-style/#comment-7226</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/tech-fun/?p=1189#comment-7226</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve installed it on four different machines, it started in less than 45 seconds on all of them, some less than 30 seconds.  You might check how much RAM you&#039;re working with, sounds like you&#039;re less than a gig.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve installed it on four different machines, it started in less than 45 seconds on all of them, some less than 30 seconds.  You might check how much RAM you&#8217;re working with, sounds like you&#8217;re less than a gig.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jake</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tech-fun/browser-comparison-microsoft-style/#comment-7189</link>
		<dc:creator>jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 10:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/tech-fun/?p=1189#comment-7189</guid>
		<description>why does it take two hours to start up in win 7. seriously though it takes like 2 minutes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why does it take two hours to start up in win 7. seriously though it takes like 2 minutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aashish Niroula</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tech-fun/browser-comparison-microsoft-style/#comment-7187</link>
		<dc:creator>Aashish Niroula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 08:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/tech-fun/?p=1189#comment-7187</guid>
		<description>Firefox and Chrome are a way ahead of IE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox and Chrome are a way ahead of IE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MoscowModder</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tech-fun/browser-comparison-microsoft-style/#comment-7179</link>
		<dc:creator>MoscowModder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 01:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/tech-fun/?p=1189#comment-7179</guid>
		<description>LOL, Micro$oft is telling you that Internet Explorer is light-centuries ahead of the competition.  It&#039;s not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL, Micro$oft is telling you that Internet Explorer is light-centuries ahead of the competition.  It&#8217;s not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tech-fun/browser-comparison-microsoft-style/#comment-7141</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 16:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/tech-fun/?p=1189#comment-7141</guid>
		<description>...I don&#039;t get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;I don&#8217;t get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached (Requested URI is rejected)
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.003 seconds using apc
Object Caching 262/263 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via main.makeuseoflimited.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.makeuseof.com @ 2012-02-11 03:51:57 -->
