<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Bandwidth of Ejaculation = 1,687.5 TerraBytes/sec</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.makeuseof.com/tech-fun/16875-terrabytessec-the-bandwidth-of-ejaculation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tech-fun/16875-terrabytessec-the-bandwidth-of-ejaculation/</link>
	<description>Humor for Techies and Geeks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:17:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: robh</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tech-fun/16875-terrabytessec-the-bandwidth-of-ejaculation/comment-page-1/#comment-6208</link>
		<dc:creator>robh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 10:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/tech-fun/?p=723#comment-6208</guid>
		<description>Yes but my wife already nags me for repeating myself. 

Surely the data content of each &quot;packet&quot; is essentially the same so I&#039;m guilty of becoming really rather boring by &quot;saying&quot; the same thing 100 million times.  An even greater waste of bandwidth than reading this!  Also I think she might argue that only counting 5 seconds of the &quot;data connection&quot; is not valid as I cannot sustain that data rate.  If she works out that in practical terms the data rate is only 37.5MB a week she&#039;ll be looking for a new &quot;modem&quot; - especially when she realises that my &quot;newspaper&quot; has the same stories each week.  By comparison she claims greater &quot;effeciency&quot; in that she only repeats herself once a month.  Obviously we&#039;re talking of ovulation, verbal repetition frequency (or as we scientists call it &quot;nagging&quot;) has a significantly lower rate of repetition but, arguably, not in comparison to my 100 million spermatazoa).

Finally there&#039;s the problem of which i/o port she is using and, frankly,  I prefer it when data gets &quot;digested&quot; rather than merged with her monthly data packet and processed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes but my wife already nags me for repeating myself. </p>
<p>Surely the data content of each &#8220;packet&#8221; is essentially the same so I&#8217;m guilty of becoming really rather boring by &#8220;saying&#8221; the same thing 100 million times.  An even greater waste of bandwidth than reading this!  Also I think she might argue that only counting 5 seconds of the &#8220;data connection&#8221; is not valid as I cannot sustain that data rate.  If she works out that in practical terms the data rate is only 37.5MB a week she&#8217;ll be looking for a new &#8220;modem&#8221; &#8211; especially when she realises that my &#8220;newspaper&#8221; has the same stories each week.  By comparison she claims greater &#8220;effeciency&#8221; in that she only repeats herself once a month.  Obviously we&#8217;re talking of ovulation, verbal repetition frequency (or as we scientists call it &#8220;nagging&#8221;) has a significantly lower rate of repetition but, arguably, not in comparison to my 100 million spermatazoa).</p>
<p>Finally there&#8217;s the problem of which i/o port she is using and, frankly,  I prefer it when data gets &#8220;digested&#8221; rather than merged with her monthly data packet and processed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeekLad</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tech-fun/16875-terrabytessec-the-bandwidth-of-ejaculation/comment-page-1/#comment-6141</link>
		<dc:creator>GeekLad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/tech-fun/?p=723#comment-6141</guid>
		<description>I got a kick out of this: right now, this is the very first search result when you search for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?q=link:geeklad.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;link:geeklad.com&lt;/a&gt;.  I&#039;m not sure exactly what that says about me and my blog.  I&#039;m not sure if it&#039;s good or not either.  :-D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got a kick out of this: right now, this is the very first search result when you search for <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=link:geeklad.com" rel="nofollow">link:geeklad.com</a>.  I&#8217;m not sure exactly what that says about me and my blog.  I&#8217;m not sure if it&#8217;s good or not either.  <img src='http://www.makeuseof.com/tech-fun/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yanis</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tech-fun/16875-terrabytessec-the-bandwidth-of-ejaculation/comment-page-1/#comment-6074</link>
		<dc:creator>Yanis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 18:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/tech-fun/?p=723#comment-6074</guid>
		<description>Wait a minute, the truth is not like that:
1,687,500,000 MB are 1,609 TB  ( difference is about 77 TB - the missing chromosome)
1609 m are one mile, coincidence? I don`t think so.
Much more conclusions can be made from this point on.
Yanis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait a minute, the truth is not like that:<br />
1,687,500,000 MB are 1,609 TB  ( difference is about 77 TB &#8211; the missing chromosome)<br />
1609 m are one mile, coincidence? I don`t think so.<br />
Much more conclusions can be made from this point on.<br />
Yanis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ezg</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tech-fun/16875-terrabytessec-the-bandwidth-of-ejaculation/comment-page-1/#comment-6044</link>
		<dc:creator>ezg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 14:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/tech-fun/?p=723#comment-6044</guid>
		<description>What a big speed... I can&#039;t believe it.. It&#039;s incredible.. :O</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a big speed&#8230; I can&#8217;t believe it.. It&#8217;s incredible.. :O</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tech-fun/16875-terrabytessec-the-bandwidth-of-ejaculation/comment-page-1/#comment-6038</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 19:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/tech-fun/?p=723#comment-6038</guid>
		<description>I knew I was quick...but damn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew I was quick&#8230;but damn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jacov</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tech-fun/16875-terrabytessec-the-bandwidth-of-ejaculation/comment-page-1/#comment-6033</link>
		<dc:creator>jacov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 12:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/tech-fun/?p=723#comment-6033</guid>
		<description>ok, then what the bandwidth of a human female penis?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok, then what the bandwidth of a human female penis?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Latest Picks from MakeUseOf Geeky Fun &#124; MakeUseOf.com</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tech-fun/16875-terrabytessec-the-bandwidth-of-ejaculation/comment-page-1/#comment-6025</link>
		<dc:creator>Latest Picks from MakeUseOf Geeky Fun &#124; MakeUseOf.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 19:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/tech-fun/?p=723#comment-6025</guid>
		<description>[...] 3. The Bandwidth of Ejaculation = 1,687.5 TerraBytes/sec [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 3. The Bandwidth of Ejaculation = 1,687.5 TerraBytes/sec [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
