The Bandwidth of Ejaculation = 1,687.5 TerraBytes/sec

Nov. 19th, 2008 By asssa3000
    (1) The human cell contains 75 MB of genetic information.
    (2) A sperm 37.5 MB.
    (3) In a milliliter, we have 100 million sperms.
    (4) On average, one ejaculation releases 2.25 ml in 5 seconds.
    (5) Using basic math we can compute the bandwidth of the human male penis as:
    (37.5MB x 100M x 2.25)/5 = (37,500,000 bytes/sperm x 100,000,000 sperm/ml x 2.25 ml) / 5 seconds = 1,687,500,000,000,000 bytes/sec = 1,687.5 TerraBytes/sec.

Source: qdb.us (via Digg)

SUBSCRIBE: Daily updates on new Cool Websites by email

Plus get free cheat sheets to your favorite programs.
7 Comments Add Comment
2008-11-28 06:26:17
jacov

ok, then what the bandwidth of a human female penis?

2008-11-28 13:55:02
Rob

I knew I was quick…but damn

2008-11-29 08:25:52
ezg

What a big speed… I can’t believe it.. It’s incredible.. :O

2008-12-08 12:05:29
Yanis

Wait a minute, the truth is not like that:
1,687,500,000 MB are 1,609 TB ( difference is about 77 TB - the missing chromosome)
1609 m are one mile, coincidence? I don`t think so.
Much more conclusions can be made from this point on.
Yanis

2008-12-18 14:09:33

I got a kick out of this: right now, this is the very first search result when you search for link:geeklad.com. I’m not sure exactly what that says about me and my blog. I’m not sure if it’s good or not either. :-D

2008-12-30 04:05:25
robh

Yes but my wife already nags me for repeating myself.

Surely the data content of each “packet” is essentially the same so I’m guilty of becoming really rather boring by “saying” the same thing 100 million times. An even greater waste of bandwidth than reading this! Also I think she might argue that only counting 5 seconds of the “data connection” is not valid as I cannot sustain that data rate. If she works out that in practical terms the data rate is only 37.5MB a week she’ll be looking for a new “modem” - especially when she realises that my “newspaper” has the same stories each week. By comparison she claims greater “effeciency” in that she only repeats herself once a month. Obviously we’re talking of ovulation, verbal repetition frequency (or as we scientists call it “nagging”) has a significantly lower rate of repetition but, arguably, not in comparison to my 100 million spermatazoa).

Finally there’s the problem of which i/o port she is using and, frankly, I prefer it when data gets “digested” rather than merged with her monthly data packet and processed.

Reply

You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.