Pinterest Stumbleupon Whatsapp
Ads by Google

With Android Wear over six months old, one might wonder how the $199 Samsung Gear Live stacks up to its newer competition. To date, we’ve seen the $249.99 Sony SmartWatch 3, $249.99 Moto 360, the ~$120 LG G Watch, the $299 LG G Watch R and now the $199.99 Asus ZenWatch. What’s surprising is that the Samsung Gear Live still holds up well to its newer competitors. It offers rock solid build quality, good performance and decent battery life (compared to other Android Wear devices). But does its stalwart performance warrant a purchase?

Hardware and Specs

  • Chipset: Snapdragon 400, 1.2 GHz single-core CPU, Adreno 305 GPU
  • Screen: 1.63″ AMOLED 320×320 (278 PPI)
  • RAM: 512MB
  • Storage: 4GB internal memory
  • Battery: 300 mAh Li-ion battery
  • Dimensions: 37.9 x 56.4 8.9 mm
  • Wireless: Bluetooth 4.0 LE (low energy)
  • Weight: 59 g
  • Water resistance: IP67

The Snapdragon 400 chipset technically includes a 4-core 1.2GHz CPU and the Adreno 305 GPU. It dominates as the chipset of choice for budget smartphones and all but one Android Wear (what’s a wearable OS? What Operating Systems Do Wearable Devices Run On? What Operating Systems Do Wearable Devices Run On? Wearable tech, in its many shapes and forms, changes human-machine interaction. Read More ) smartwatch. In wearables, manufacturers disable three of the four cores – so while these are technically four-core systems, only one core works. To complement the CPU, Qualcomm packages the 400 series with a Hexagon Digital Signal Processor, which permits power-efficient voice recognition (among many other features). The Hexagon DSP makes it difficult for Samsung to leverage a custom Exynos chipset for Android Wear, without paying licensing fees to Qualcomm.

As of the end of 2014, Android Wear device manufacturers depend on the 400 series from Qualcomm. With the energy-efficient Snapdragon 410, it’s baffling why manufacturers haven’t yet moved to a better standard. It’s equally disappointing that Google discourages more energy efficient chipsets from entering the Android Wear ecosystem. As it stands, 1-3 days of battery life will remain the norm for at least the rest of 2015.

samsung gear live unboxed

Aesthetics and Hardware

Unlike the LG G Watch LG G Watch Review and Giveaway LG G Watch Review and Giveaway Does the LG G Watch suck or does it manage to justify its $229 price tag? Read More , Samsung constructed the Gear Live from both metal and plastic. On its face, a brushed aluminum bezel surrounds the 320 x 320 AMOLED screen. On its rear surface, two plastic divots allow a the charging cradle to clip onto the Live. Unfortunately, the clips on my charging cradle snapped off immediately – which Samsung does not cover under its warranty program. The replacement charger — a flimsy piece of plastic — is priced at the near-criminal cost of $29.99, on Amazon. A quick perusal of the reviews indicate the replacement charger is just as weak as the original.

Ads by Google

broken cradle charger

I recommend using a rubber band to hold the Live in place. The winner of this giveaway will receive both a rubberband and a broken cradle charger, at no additional cost!

samsung gear live broke back cradle

Making Use of the Samsung Gear Live

The Samsung Gear Live implements a gorgeous, energy-efficient wallpaper. There’s two watch faces: One is multicolored and the other shows in black-and-white. The default display uses a Spartan, black-and-white layout. When users click the home button the colored watch-face overlays color on top. To date, this remains the best-looking – and most functional – watch-face design within Android Wear.

I would have preferred a red-and-black design for the permanently lit sections of the screen. White pixels on an AMOLED screen technically fire up three different color-emitting diodes, in order to produce white: Red, Blue and Green. Blue color emanating diodes possess less durability than green and red. Red diodes last the longest – which would make it the most suitable color for a persistent image. Also, red diodes require less energy by itself. Even so, the display looks great.

samsung gear live display2

A single press on the screen turns on Google Now. Alternatively, users can use the accelerometers to flick the screen on and then speak the key words “OK Google” – this enters into voice recognition mode, in which the user can vocally input commands. There’s a long list of Google Now voice-commands (which continue growing). These fall into roughly five categories:

  • Scheduling: Calendar and reminder;
  • Communication: Social media, texting and phone calls;
  • Entertainment: Music, movies, TV, etc…;
  • Navigation: Google Maps;
  • Google Search;

These five categories cover the majority of on-the-go needs of the average user. I found myself relying heavily on the Gear Live while driving – Google Now nails hands-free navigation and texting. Other devices offer the same functionality – for example, the Moto X can perform the same hands-free functions as an Android Wear smartwatch, with similar battery life. So why would anyone buy a smartwatch?

gear live apps2

Think of it this way: You can turn any Android 4.3 device – including budget phones – into a Moto X. A good example would be the Moto G or E, which retail for below $200. Dampening this realization: The user need worry about the battery life of two devices, instead of one. Even so, a budget smartphone and a smartwatch costs less than the retail value of a $550 2014 Moto X.

The user experience between Android Wear devices remain near identical. While the $130 G Watch requires more manual interaction than the $200 Samsung Gear Live, the price difference between the two might justify going with the G Watch.

Battery Life

The Gear Live is no Pebble Pebble Smartwatch Review & Giveaway Pebble Smartwatch Review & Giveaway Smartwatches are the new hottest trend in today's tech world, and the Pebble e-ink watch helped start the fire. The most successful Kickstarter project to date, the Pebble raised over $10 million during its 1-month... Read More . Many users report getting a full-day of battery life out of the Gear Live. I received almost two days with ambient display turned off and a full-day with ambient display turned on. This owes – in part – to Samsung’s AMOLED screen, which allows black pixels to be turned off when not in use. Some may notice the G Watch and Moto 360’s similar battery life, with LCD screens; LG crammed a 400 mAh battery into its G Watch. The Moto 360’s battery life won’t last a full day with its screen turned on all the time.

All said, a day or two of battery life means that the Gear Live puts a lot more wear-and-tear on its battery. I found that if not charged daily, the battery could completely discharge – and remained discharged for extended periods of time. In the long-run, virtually all Android Wear devices will require a replacement battery. And none of these devices are user-serviceable.

Software and Applications

The Android Wear Operating System – a closed source derivative of Android – offers some of the same apps within the Google Play Store. Many developers pushed out half-baked Android Wear versions of their Play Store app. Most of these do not offer additional functionality, compared to their tablet and smartphone cousins. Users still cannot choose to install apps direct onto their smartwatch. Instead, apps install to a paired device, which are then pushed onto the watch.

More than six months after release, the Android Wear app library boasts thousands of apps. The most popular applications simply extend the smartphone app onto a smaller screen. The rest simply show notifications or allow users to read information from their app, directly on their watch-face. You can find a complete list of Wear apps, here.

gear live apps

The Gear Live’s OLED screen allows “ambient screen”, or when the screen runs constantly. This owes to its OLED (organic light emitting diode) technology, which allows individual pixels to exude light, while shutting off black cells. The drain on always-on OLED (or AMOLED) is reported to be 70-80% less than LCD screens, which require a backlight to constant run. An always on LCD screen consumes the same amount of power whether it displays blacks or whites. Technically speaking, LCDs consume less power while displaying whites, but it’s a minuscule difference.

One of the most useless features on the Gear Live: Its heart-rate sensor. The sensor uses the green-light method of measuring beats-per-second. This method has proven useless for tracking heart-rate while the user is in motion. As such, users can only check resting heart-rate because the design of the Gear Live doesn’t properly isolate external light, which interferes with the sensor. Do not buy the Gear Live if you’re looking for a fitness tracker. It can only reliably count footsteps (which most wearables can do anyway, such as the Basis B1 Health Tracker Basis B1 Health Tracker Smartwatch (2014) Review and Giveaway Basis B1 Health Tracker Smartwatch (2014) Review and Giveaway Want to lose weight and think clearer? You might find help from the Basis B1 Health Tracker smartwatch. Read More or the Basis Peak).

heart rate sensor gear live

Samsung also configured the Gear Live to disable its accelerometers whenever the ambient screen is enabled – so you can’t just swing your arm up to activate Google Now.

Conclusion

To my surprise, the Samsung Gear Live still offers good value compared to the other Android Wear smartwatches. Its battery life, while not amazing, does quite well for a ~300 mAh battery. It holds up well because there isn’t enough differentiation between Android Wear watches to justify anything more than trivial price differences. For example, compared to the Asus ZenWatch, the Live falls behind a bit in every respect – but there’s no tremendous difference between the two devices.

boxed samsung gear live

Don’t buy it. If you do need an Android Wear device (despite my warnings), the Samsung Gear Live offers slightly less value than comparable Wear devices. It may not offer the same aesthetic beauty as the Moto 360 or the Asus ZenWatch, but it does get the job done (which boils down to hands-free activation of Google Now).

Samsung Gear Live Giveaway

The winner will be selected at random and informed via email. View the list of winners here.

Send your products to be reviewed. Contact James Bruce for further details.

  1. Pro Wiz
    June 12, 2015 at 1:10 pm

    I recieved my Gear Live in March, for my Birthday... I love it over all... However, in the first few days, one of the little brass things on the back of my watch vanished... the others good up with gunk and have to be cleaned before the charger will work. It is a PITA using the charging adapter, and to ensure I had one around I had to pay $25 each for extra ones... and those after market ones don't always make good contact... Now... 2 months into it, my Gear Live decides it is not going to charge on random moments... it shows that it is charging, but the % continues to drop, until the watch craps with a dead battery.. THEN it charges... a lot of good that does me. Calling Samsung will get you nothing... they will accuse you of abuse when the metal things come off, and not offer any assistance with the other stuff. Although I do like having it, I am totally unimpressed with the overall design... When this one finally gets to where it won't charge at all, or come on - - I will replace it with something other then what Samsung has.

  2. Jim
    January 16, 2015 at 9:26 pm

    just because your a clumsy oaf and broke the charger device is no reason to shit all over the fine name of Samsung! I have had every watch they have ever made and I never even came close to having a problem. I must say that for a supposedly professional report on a new product you come across as an angry 23 year old boy with that stupid rubber band! Grow up, take care when using your electronics and you will have no reason to print such a biased report. On my way to pick up the S model. Yeah Samsung....

    • Kannon Y
      January 16, 2015 at 10:13 pm

      I've broken electronics before due to being a clumsy oaf, but in this case, it may have been a manufacturing defect. The cradle charger never attached securely and I couldn't locate the missing piece. It may have arrived that way.

      Samsung is the only one of the Android Wear wearables manufacturers that uses a clip on charger instead of a magnetic cradle (which is clipless). They could improve on the design by using a clipless charger.

      I haven't gotten around to testing it yet, but the S version looks like a great device. I'm thinking of reviewing it soon.

  3. Connor
    January 7, 2015 at 4:52 pm

    I've been researching a couple of smart watches and am stuck between the Gear Live and the G Watch. I really like the Gear Live and feel it is a slightly nicer watch but the price point of the G Watch is really attractive. If anyone believes that there is something to really swing me one way or another I'll be watching the comments. Until then I guess I'll wait for the contest and see if I get lucky!

    • Shairoz
      January 12, 2015 at 12:43 am

      Just my personal opinion, but with a good leather band the G watch can pass as much less obnoxious and "nerdy" then the Gear Live. My friend owns the GL and I own the G watch, and he refuses to wear it to even a mildly formal event. Performance is exactly the same and benefits to productivity are trivial at best; so the major reason to buy a smartwatch boils down to appearance, and the G watch has a subtle and understated charm.

  4. Edmond
    January 7, 2015 at 2:49 am

    Wow, prize watch is fab. & splendid. 2 fingers snap. It is tight, fly & off the chain. Thank you for the awesomeness, the contest, and generosity. Pick me, pick me! Dear Santa: I’ve been nice. My X-Mas wish this year is to win this contest. Starving artist here desperately needs the watch to work and eat again.

  5. Elton Woo
    January 6, 2015 at 3:20 am

    A rubber band? Really?? At Almost $200 US and no sooner you use it you have to use an elastic band like it's some ten-dollar piece of equipment? For shame, Samsung! Has your quality sunk so low? Incredible! ... and disappointing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *