Why The Nexus 7 Is Competition For The iPad [Opinion]

Ads by Google

nexus 7 vs ipadGoogle unveiled the Nexus 7, its long-awaited foray into the burgeoning tablet market, at Google I/O last month. The combination of hardware, design, and price took many by surprise, with all three of these components being about the best we could have hoped for from such a device at this time.

The reviews from people testing the Nexus 7 for an extended period have been almost unanimously positive. However, while many have rightly compared the Nexus 7 to the Kindle Fire, and stated that Google’s effort blows Amazon’s out of the water, few would even mention the Nexus 7 in the same breath as the Apple iPad. I disagree with this inherent refusal to put the two on a par.

I believe the Nexus 7 is competition for the iPad and I feel competition to Apple’s stranglehold on the tablet market is exactly what’s needed at this juncture.

The iPad Vs. Everything Else

nexus 7 vs ipad

To understand how the Nexus 7 will prove to be competition for the iPad we first need to understand Apple’s offering. The new iPad, as unveiled in March is a 10-inch tablet boasting a Retina Display, front- and rear-facing cameras, and a new quad-core CPU. It’s very pleasing on the eye and, by all accounts, is a joy to use.

Even I, the person who wrote an article entitled ‘5 Reasons The New iPad Sucks‘ appreciate that it’s probably the best tablet on the market right now. There are some premium Android tablets on the market (such as the Transformer Prime) that are very close, but Apple’s tablet is the most likely to please those who purchase it. That’s why it has sold in the quantities it has, while the competition has invariably struggled.

The Google Nexus 7

nexus 7 vs ipad

Ads by Google

Entering stage left is the Nexus 7, manufactured by Asus but with Google’s stamp all over it, figuratively and literally. The Nexus 7 boasts a 7-inch IPS display with 216 ppi (pixels-per-inch) made of Corning glass, a quad-core Tegra 3 processor, 1GB of RAM, a front-facing camera, GPS, Bluetooth, and NFC, and battery life of around 8 hours. It also comes with stock Android 4.1 (Jelly Bean), meaning no bloatware or ugly overlay to deal with.

The Nexus 7 is available in two flavors – an 8GB version costing $199 and a 16GB version costing $249. These price points compare favorably with Apple’s current options – the new iPad at $499, the iPad 2 at $399 – and is on a par with the Kindle Fire, which costs $199 at the time of writing. In terms of quality there is a gulf between the Kindle Fire and Nexus 7 though.

The Best Of Both Worlds

The Nexus 7 offers the best of both worlds. It has a quality display that will be more than enough for most people, the processor is phenomenal, the RAM very capable, and the 7-inch form factor is proving to be increasingly popular. Steve Jobs may have hated it but there’s a strong chance Apple will be launching its own mini-iPad at some point over the next few months with Tim Cook installed as CEO.

It also offers stock Android, which many people will prefer to iOS for various reasons, and also prefer to Amazon’s overburdened overlay. Android has been vastly improved as an operating system for tablets too, which is probably the reason Google waited until now before bringing the Nexus name to the tablet market.

Creation Vs. Consumption

The big question is whether the Nexus 7 will be used just for the consumption of content or if it will allow for the creation of content as well. The Kindle Fire was built to fulfill the first, with Amazon using its overlay to channel everything through its own storefront. This is how the online retailer keeps its costs down – offering the hardware on the cheap and making the money from sales of music, movies, and more down the line. The iPad can be used in either capacity, with people increasingly using the iPad to create as well as consume.

For the Nexus 7 to compete on a level playing field with Apple’s tablet it needs to be capable of being used in a productive fashion. The 7-inch screen won’t be as comfortable to write on as the 10-inch screen of the iPad, but I’ve managed perfectly well taking notes on my cheap Android tablet that I cannot see this being a problem.

It’s important to note that the iPad isn’t the best tool for the job either – with a physical keyboard always winning out over a touchscreen – but it’s often the closest to hand. The Nexus 7, with its pocket-friendly size, will be even closer to hand, and on more occasions.

One Ring Tablet To Rule Them All

From previous articles I have written some may have formed the impression I’m a Windows and/or Android fanboy (delete as applicable), or at the very least an anti-Apple zealot. This isn’t the case at all. I like good technology that is priced fairly.

I’m not a particular fan of Apple’s closed system or its need to control every aspect of its products, and the price tags Apple assigns to everything it sells are extraordinary (a laptop costing $2,199, I ask you!). But my ultimate desire is for one thing and one thing alone – competition.

It’s this that drives innovation and stops the big tech firms falling into a pattern of offering lazy incremental upgrades on an annual basis. Right now Apple is in just that position, dominating the tablet market so fully that it can do the bare minimum each year to stay on top. Having one tablet to rule them all isn’t good for anyone, including Apple. Which is why we all need the Nexus 7 to succeed.


To sum up I firmly believe Google’s first branded tablet will provide healthy competition for the iPad, for the following reasons:-

  • The price brings the Nexus 7 into ‘impulse buy’ range.
  • The 7-inch form factor will appeal to a wider demographic.
  • The hardware bridges the gap between consumption and creation.
  • Android has come of age against an increasingly tired-looking iOS.

All of these reasons count, and all will contribute to the Nexus 7 eating into sales of the iPad, despite what those who regard the Apple tablet as untouchable may believe. Whether you agree or disagree please let me know your thoughts in the comments section below. Opinion is free, discussion is good, debate is healthy.

Image Credit: bandita

Ads by Google
Comments (47)
  • Roger E

    idk y everyone is hatin on apple. they got good intentions, just cuz they dont follow the same methods as the other companys doesnt make them bad. they just want to make money like all companys. thats y they make things that work better with their products. give them a break guys.

    • Stephen B

      [Shoots new iPad] “I’m sorry, did I break your concentration? I didn’t mean to do that. Please, continue, you were saying something about best intentions. What’s the matter? Oh, you were finished! Well, allow me to retort.” – Chinese teenagers making $0.60 a day to make Apple products, surrounded by “suicide nets” to keep the workers from jumping out the windows to their deaths. End of story.

  • Mistry_Land


  • denny Gl

    quadcore at cheapcost is new.but does adding a sd and will increase in high cost google can think of it

  • allan jay monteclaro

    Me like. I hope the price here in the Philippines is as reasonable as the one in US.

  • Mani Ahmed

    I have been always biased against Apple products, even though owning ma self 3 of the 3 items from its product line (iphone, iPod & Macbook), i have not owned a iPad but instead been using a chinese Novo7 tablet to my hearts content. However no matter what i think the graphics quality of both the hardware and the software and the quality of touch screen on apple has never been beaten. Another issue which i personally have no issues but always find maself in a predicament when my wife complains is that all android appls on the Google Play are not necessarily to work, whereas App Store apps are almost always applicable and always run smoothly.

    • Donnie T

      Yes, this is a known disadvantage to the Android OS called fragmentation. You see, Android devices are made by a variety of different manufacturers with an even larger variety of specifications. To compound the issue even further, some of these manufacturers put their own UI skin over the OS, and because of these differences, each device has to be tested independently for each OS. So when making an app, the developer has to take into account 3 factors: device specs, idiosyncracies of custom UI’s, and OS versions. It is difficult to make apps that will work on every device. This is quite a disadvantage for Android. In its defense, it does have a system that in theory filters out incompatible apps from being able to be viewed in the market on devices they cannot run on. This does not always work.

      However, the positive side of this is the same as the cause. Android users have many phones to choose from, and this choice guarantees that they will find a phone to suit their needs. Most apps are made with the higher end phones in mind first, so if you are looking for something with high compatibility a high-end device is your best bet.

      Hell, if you have Tasker App Factory, you can even make your own apps very easily, with little or no programming knowledge whatsoever.

      I have the Galaxy S 3 and in my opinion it is the best phone being made right now. Period. If it means I have to pass on a couple of apps, like iBoobs or Poop Time (lol it ridiculous apps), I can live with it.

    • Sam

      Yes, Ahmed, sadly it is true that Android devices are more prone to app/device compatibilty issues than Apple devices. The reason for this is a common issue known as fragmentation. You see, there are many manufacturers who make Android devices to a variety of specifications. They also often put custom UI skins over the Android OS, changing the look and sometimes in small ways, the functionality. And finally, because of these differences, each device must be tested individually for compatibility with each release of a new OS version. Because there are so many variables, app developers have to consider all of them when making an app. So between OS version, hardware, and UI customization, it is very difficult to create an app that is universally compatible. For this reason, most are catered to higher-end devices, as these seem to be more popular.

      With every cloud, however, comes a silver lining. The reason that this issue exists is because of the freedom provided to you by an Android device. You can choose a device that meets your exact needs as far as specifications, and with devices continually being released, you do not have to wait until the next version comes out when it is time to do an upgrade (unless you have your eye on a specific device). For me, this vastly outweighs the issue of fragmentation, because competition is the driving factor behind innovation. Manufacturers compete to build the best devices, and we are the benefactors. If one phone doesn’t have what we want, we have the freedom to choose another one.

      What it comes down to is priorities. If it is very important to have virtually every app work perfectly with your phone’s hardware, go with the iPhone. If it is more important for you to have the hardware to run just about any app, and do anything you want with it, Android is the way to go.

      I have a Galaxy S III, and would challenge any iPhone owner to show me something (useful) their phone can do that mine can’t.

Load 10 more
Affiliate Disclamer

This review may contain affiliate links, which pays us a small compensation if you do decide to make a purchase based on our recommendation. Our judgement is in no way biased, and our recommendations are always based on the merits of the items.

For more details, please read our disclosure.
Affiliate Disclamer

This review may contain affiliate links, which pays us a small compensation if you do decide to make a purchase based on our recommendation. Our judgement is in no way biased, and our recommendations are always based on the merits of the items.

For more details, please read our disclosure.