<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Transmission vs uTorrent [Mac Only]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/is-utorrent-a-viable-option-for-transmission-mac-only/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/is-utorrent-a-viable-option-for-transmission-mac-only/</link>
	<description>Cool Websites, Software and Internet Tips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ghost</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/is-utorrent-a-viable-option-for-transmission-mac-only/#comment-435283</link>
		<dc:creator>ghost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 11:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=8604#comment-435283</guid>
		<description>why would your speed be zero if you ignore unencrypted peers with transmission? Wont you just only download from peers that also have encryption enabled?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why would your speed be zero if you ignore unencrypted peers with transmission? Wont you just only download from peers that also have encryption enabled?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/is-utorrent-a-viable-option-for-transmission-mac-only/#comment-435212</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 01:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=8604#comment-435212</guid>
		<description>to ignore unencrypted peers in utorrent there go to preferences and select FORCE for encrypted outgoing cnnxions.

I dont think transmission ignores them completely, because if you ignore incoming connections, your speed will be zero.

by the way, Utorrent is faster for me than any other client I ve ever used. Vuze is too slow, both in downloading section and in its operation. It is always doing something, my mac gets slow because of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to ignore unencrypted peers in utorrent there go to preferences and select FORCE for encrypted outgoing cnnxions.</p>
<p>I dont think transmission ignores them completely, because if you ignore incoming connections, your speed will be zero.</p>
<p>by the way, Utorrent is faster for me than any other client I ve ever used. Vuze is too slow, both in downloading section and in its operation. It is always doing something, my mac gets slow because of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ghost</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/is-utorrent-a-viable-option-for-transmission-mac-only/#comment-433747</link>
		<dc:creator>ghost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 11:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=8604#comment-433747</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using transmission on mac for about a year, and have reached my max download speed countless times.(sometimes with one torrent, sometimes with multiple). I Will be testing utorrent for mac, to see how it runs. Also I haven&#039;t seen a feature in utorrent for mac to &#039;ignore unencrypted peers&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using transmission on mac for about a year, and have reached my max download speed countless times.(sometimes with one torrent, sometimes with multiple). I Will be testing utorrent for mac, to see how it runs. Also I haven&#8217;t seen a feature in utorrent for mac to &#8216;ignore unencrypted peers&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/is-utorrent-a-viable-option-for-transmission-mac-only/#comment-429728</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 22:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=8604#comment-429728</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve noticed that with the mac uTorrent, that once it&#039;s closed out and re-opened. Preferences you set are reverted to default.

An example is when I change my download location to a torrent specific folder, it&#039; reverts to my user home DL folder. So I have to pause all torrents on quit, re-open, change DL location, and resume all torrents.

My conclusion is that I&#039;m not going to switch to uTorrent (At least not until it gets better) I started with BitTorrent&#039;s app, then tried Transmission and used it ever since.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve noticed that with the mac uTorrent, that once it&#8217;s closed out and re-opened. Preferences you set are reverted to default.</p>
<p>An example is when I change my download location to a torrent specific folder, it&#8217; reverts to my user home DL folder. So I have to pause all torrents on quit, re-open, change DL location, and resume all torrents.</p>
<p>My conclusion is that I&#8217;m not going to switch to uTorrent (At least not until it gets better) I started with BitTorrent&#8217;s app, then tried Transmission and used it ever since.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/is-utorrent-a-viable-option-for-transmission-mac-only/#comment-420723</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=8604#comment-420723</guid>
		<description>you&#039;re right, mac is slow as crap compared to linux</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you&#8217;re right, mac is slow as crap compared to linux</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/is-utorrent-a-viable-option-for-transmission-mac-only/#comment-402794</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 08:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=8604#comment-402794</guid>
		<description>Having tested both extensively, I can report that each client favours peers using their own software.  This is astounding but I can verify this 100% on my mac!  

The same torrent file on uTorrent shows a list of peers with approx 70% using uTorrent, while Transmission&#039;s peers for the same torrent shows peers mostly using Transmission.

If this observation is correct across the board, and since uTorrent is massive in the PC sector, you could get a wider pool of uTorrent peers from which to choose. This may have an impact on the average download rate of the swarm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having tested both extensively, I can report that each client favours peers using their own software.  This is astounding but I can verify this 100% on my mac!  </p>
<p>The same torrent file on uTorrent shows a list of peers with approx 70% using uTorrent, while Transmission&#8217;s peers for the same torrent shows peers mostly using Transmission.</p>
<p>If this observation is correct across the board, and since uTorrent is massive in the PC sector, you could get a wider pool of uTorrent peers from which to choose. This may have an impact on the average download rate of the swarm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Callum</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/is-utorrent-a-viable-option-for-transmission-mac-only/#comment-399417</link>
		<dc:creator>Callum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 00:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=8604#comment-399417</guid>
		<description>haha you cant compare anything on linux to mac
especially when its ran through an emulator</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha you cant compare anything on linux to mac<br />
especially when its ran through an emulator</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kovac</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/is-utorrent-a-viable-option-for-transmission-mac-only/#comment-397310</link>
		<dc:creator>Kovac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 05:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=8604#comment-397310</guid>
		<description>First of all, a rant. Bad, bad Johnny Boy. Don&#039;t be so stingy, so greedy. Seed. Forever. Not everything, mind you - when I don&#039;t like a file, I don&#039;t want other people to be disappointed with it as well. But my favourites, oh boy - I got one at 30 ratio, and counting. I will only stop seeding when I delete the file itself.

Now, to business.

Even though everyone else is already saying it, I feel the need to repeat it once again. And I hate to admit that something originally meant for Windows works better than the one for Unix. But, here goes truth:

My connection isn&#039;t very fast (top speed is ~200kB/s down, ~60 up). uTorrent gets me there, allowing me to use the whole potential of my cheap connection.

Transmission doesn&#039;t.

I pick uTorrent. End of story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, a rant. Bad, bad Johnny Boy. Don&#8217;t be so stingy, so greedy. Seed. Forever. Not everything, mind you &#8211; when I don&#8217;t like a file, I don&#8217;t want other people to be disappointed with it as well. But my favourites, oh boy &#8211; I got one at 30 ratio, and counting. I will only stop seeding when I delete the file itself.</p>
<p>Now, to business.</p>
<p>Even though everyone else is already saying it, I feel the need to repeat it once again. And I hate to admit that something originally meant for Windows works better than the one for Unix. But, here goes truth:</p>
<p>My connection isn&#8217;t very fast (top speed is ~200kB/s down, ~60 up). uTorrent gets me there, allowing me to use the whole potential of my cheap connection.</p>
<p>Transmission doesn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>I pick uTorrent. End of story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: i2ehan</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/is-utorrent-a-viable-option-for-transmission-mac-only/#comment-397132</link>
		<dc:creator>i2ehan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 08:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=8604#comment-397132</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t disagree more. Don&#039;t take my word for it however, try it for yourself: download the latest uTorrent beta, enable port forwarding, and you&#039;ll witness a substantial increase in your DL speed; and I mean substantial! I am virtually capped out at my max DL speed, it&#039;s insane! Tip: Since some clients limit the minimum required upload speed (otherwise, the download ratio is drastically affected), even at 10kB/s UL limit, your DL speed can cap at max! Use this only when necessary however, don&#039;t leech! Keep in mind, others are sacrificing their speed for your downloads, so seed people, seed!!! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t disagree more. Don&#8217;t take my word for it however, try it for yourself: download the latest uTorrent beta, enable port forwarding, and you&#8217;ll witness a substantial increase in your DL speed; and I mean substantial! I am virtually capped out at my max DL speed, it&#8217;s insane! Tip: Since some clients limit the minimum required upload speed (otherwise, the download ratio is drastically affected), even at 10kB/s UL limit, your DL speed can cap at max! Use this only when necessary however, don&#8217;t leech! Keep in mind, others are sacrificing their speed for your downloads, so seed people, seed!!! <img src="http://main.makeuseoflimited.netdna-cdn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif?323f2c" alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rakoth</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/is-utorrent-a-viable-option-for-transmission-mac-only/#comment-385608</link>
		<dc:creator>rakoth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 22:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=8604#comment-385608</guid>
		<description>Right, noticed that too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right, noticed that too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached (Requested URI is rejected)
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.004 seconds using apc
Object Caching 303/304 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via main.makeuseoflimited.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.makeuseof.com @ 2012-02-11 02:29:24 -->
