Instagram – From Zero To A Billion [INFOGRAPHIC]

Ads by Google

The big news on the net this week that has got everyone talking is Instagram’s acquisition by Facebook for the absurd amount of $1 billion. Why absurd? Because Instagram has zero revenue, so how can anyone say that the company is worth $1 billion?  It’s as if Mark Zuckerberg suddenly felt like buying something. Other people buy a puppy or a sports car. Zuckerberg drops a billion on a company with no revenue, and in the process makes everyone at Instagram millionaires, including one employee who joined the company only 3 weeks ago.

I have recently started using Instagram myself, when I bought an iPhone last month, so I sincerely hope that Facebook doesn’t ruin my new favourite site with ads, games and other crap that normally clogs up Facebook. But you have to wonder how Instagram managed such a stunning success in such a short space of time (17 months). Has any other website managed to pull off a one billion dollar coup in a shorter space of time? I’m pretty sure the answer is no.

Our infographic today shows Instagram’s beginnings back in March 2010 and its astonishing rise to where it is today. It just goes to show that indeed anything is possible on the Internet.

What do you think? Is the one billion dollar valuation justifiable? Or is it just silly numbers plucked out of the sky simply to close a deal and wow everyone? Are you excited or afraid that Instagram may changed by Facebook?

Click on the infographic below for a larger version

Infographic Source: Visual.ly

Join live MakeUseOf Groups on Grouvi App Join live Groups on Grouvi
Web for Kids
Web for Kids
7 Members
Deep Web Communities
Deep Web Communities
16 Members
Awesome Websites
Awesome Websites
30 Members
Best Music Services
Best Music Services
16 Members
Ads by Google
Comments (9)
  • Abdelhafid

    Nice point of view you got there, mark is a rich jerk and this what jerks like him do in their free time

    • Mark O’Neill

      For a moment I thought you were calling me the jerk but then I realised you meant Mark Zuckerberg (I hope!) :-)

      For a moment, I thought “I’m not rich! Or a jerk!” LOL!

    • abdelhafid

      i don’t know about you being a rich or not, but definitely you’re not a jerk
      any way,with your permission i’d like to translate the post into my native language – which is Arabic by the way – ans re-post it translated in my blog -abdelhafid.com-

    • Mark O’Neill

      If you want to translate the MakeUseOf post, then it’s OK as long as you credit MakeUseOf with a linkback to this page, as well as credit visual.ly for the infographic.

      If you want to translate only the infographic, then you will need to contact visual.ly for permission, as they own it, not us.

    • abdelhafid

      done, thanks, and here’s a link to my article

      http://www.abdelhafid.com/2012/04/instagram-from-zero-to-billion/

      i translated the basics (the main idea) and the rest was from me, no infography was translated either, and of course a make use of-credit link was posted at the end of the article .

  • Dave Parrack

    It’s inevitable Facebook will change Instagram over time. But I don’t think $1 billion was that over the top. Facebook now owns a growing competitor it could make money from in the future, has opened a backdoor into Twitter, and has added some obviously talented engineers to its workforce. Bargain.

    • Mark O’Neill

      But there was no need to buy them. Facebook is THE dominant force on the Internet. Everyone leaves their status messages there, so why worry about Twitter? Everyone puts their photos on Facebook so why bother with Instagram? Facebook has the money and the clout to flip the finger at everyone and not worry about a thing.

      I think it was basically a case of “we’ll buy them so no-one else can” – consolidating their position of power. That and Zuckerberg already had enough puppies and sports cars.

    • Dave Parrack

      It is the dominant force right now but things can change very quickly on the Web. Just look at MySpace, that was once the dominant force that everyone was signed up for.

      I read tweets from youngsters bemoaning the buyout as Facebook is for old people. That says a lot.

      It’s definitely consolidation though, just before the IPO too. They’ve just acquired another mobile startup as well. Zueckerberg will never have enough puppies or sports cars. Or indeed startups.

    • Paul

      Agreed they are dominant but in this game things move very quickly. Take a look at how Pinterest are speeding along now.

Affiliate Disclamer

This review may contain affiliate links, which pays us a small compensation if you do decide to make a purchase based on our recommendation. Our judgement is in no way biased, and our recommendations are always based on the merits of the items.

For more details, please read our disclosure.
Affiliate Disclamer

This review may contain affiliate links, which pays us a small compensation if you do decide to make a purchase based on our recommendation. Our judgement is in no way biased, and our recommendations are always based on the merits of the items.

For more details, please read our disclosure.