How Functional Is The Current YouTube Video Editor?

youtube video editorA while back, Matt wrote an article about the 2010 YouTube Video Editor, and although it doesn’t seem that long ago, a lot has changed. Back then, it had a few basic features, but in all honesty, it just wasn’t really that functional. However, two years later, it’s high time to revisit the video web app. Everyone deserves a second chance, right?

First off, I’ll say this – the YouTube video editor is functional….to an extent. As with anything, there are different aspects when it comes to hitting a target audience, so let’s just say you won’t be cutting the next Academy Award winner (or maybe you’re one of those avant-garde artists who will use nothing but an iPhone and the YouTube Video Editor to create the most revolutionary work ever made). However, the app is definitely worth checking out regardless of whether you plan on using it regularly or not.

The Editor

Back when we first took a look at the YouTube Video Editor, we saw that it included some standard functions: cropping video, video splicing (a must), and Audioswap. However, the new video editor does a little bit more, but before I begin, I just want to just mention that splicing is about the only thing that is the same. Realistically, you can’t change that much.

youtube video editor

With the editor, you can put any clips you have uploaded into one big video. This is ideal for family vacation videos taken with iPhones. If you are already uploading goofy little clips of your family online, why not put them in one home movie? Seems reasonable to me. Additionally, there is a Creative Commons video library so that you can insert stock footage into your own videos. I’m not entirely sure what you would use this for, but I’m sure you could make some nifty stuff with it.

Other stuff that you can use (that would be found on any standard movie editor) include actual titles and some (corny) transitions. Furthermore, the Audioswap song selection is still around, but it looks a lot more user-friendly.

The Enhancements

What was lacking with the earlier version of the YouTube Video Editor were Enhancements. Although not actually part of the editor, the Enhancement section of YouTube provides several ways to alter the look of your video or adjust the audio. Although they aren’t the most professional tools, they are still pretty great for what they are.

youtube editor

The Enhancement section can be found in the video manager section of your channel through any of your videos, and its content is divided into three categories: quick fix, effects, and audio.  The quick fix includes basic adjustments for issues such as contrast and even saturation.  As for the effects, there are many different methods of color grading available. Also, the audio is pretty much the same as the one you would find in the editor.

youtube editor

All in all, the one thing that really stands out with me concerning these Enhancements is the implementations of a video stabilizer. As you may know, a lot of the video content on YouTube is shot on tiny, handheld, shaky smartphones.  With the stabilizer, there is actually a chance of getting some smooth video. Just pop your shaky video into the stabilizer, and YouTube should do the rest.

youtube video editor

Is It Useful?

Is it useful? Well, for an online-only web app that is target at families, then yes.  However, if you are serious about video-making, I would recommend finding something just a little better.

What other web-based video editors do you know of? Have you ever made use of the YouTube video editor?


MakeUseOf Recommends

More articles about:

9 Comments

Joshua Lockhart

Joshua Lockhart is an okay web video producer and a slightly above mediocre writer of online content. You can fawn over his work here: JoshuaLockhart.com.

The comments were closed because the article is more than 180 days old.

If you have any questions related to stuff mentioned in the article or need help with any computer issue, just ask it on MakeUseOf Answers.

Hide 9 Comments

  • Shakirah Faleh Lai July 17, 2012
    0 likes

    Wow! I don’t know about the stabilizer.

    | Like
    • Joshua Lockhart July 18, 2012
      0 likes

      It’s pretty cool : )

      | Like
      • Shakirah Faleh Lai July 18, 2012
        0 likes

        Yeah.

        | Like
  • Rick Smith July 17, 2012
    0 likes

    Although the YouTube editor is limited, it would probably be a great secondary editor to use with a second editor… maybe another editor that does not have the stabilizer, for example.

    | Like
    • Joshua Lockhart July 18, 2012
      0 likes

      I’d like to see the stabilizer implemented in standalone apps, actually.

      | Like
  • Gian Singh July 17, 2012
    0 likes

    didn’t know they had a video editor till now.

    | Like
    • Joshua Lockhart July 18, 2012
      0 likes

      Is your mind blown?

      | Like
      • Gian Singh July 18, 2012
        0 likes

        Yeah, but i hope it works good.

        | Like
  • Achraf Almouloudi July 18, 2012
    0 likes

    It is mainly useful because it doesn’t use your computer for doing operations and the great video stabilizer, but only if you manage to upload it in good resolution .

    | Like