Comments on: What Is The Difference Between A Good Hacker & A Bad Hacker? [Opinion]

By: Theo Reisinger

Theo Reisinger — Wed, 10 Oct 2012 01:20:21 +0000

I think most people think “hackers” as black hats. There are plenty of hackers that are benevolent

By: Mani Ahmed

Mani Ahmed — Wed, 18 Jul 2012 11:05:02 +0000

an interesting read .. a term which only came to my information 2 days back when i read ur article about white hat hackers … which then lead to this one. Keep us updated !

By: Adrian Carvajal

Adrian Carvajal — Tue, 17 Jul 2012 19:36:06 +0000

Hacker vs Cracker! good and bad!

By: Aryan

Aryan — Tue, 17 Jul 2012 16:03:21 +0000

I would like to go with Danny, and they might even file a case against so it would be better you stay away from such people.

By: Danny Stieben

Danny Stieben — Mon, 09 Jul 2012 15:52:52 +0000

I think there is only one group which is officially known as Anonymous, which are the ones who hack, supposedly for good.

Anonymous is otherwise a blanket term for people who want to remain hidden.

By: Marine

Marine — Sun, 08 Jul 2012 21:52:04 +0000

Now… ANONYMOUS is 2 different organzations. There is the good anonymous… wich wants us to know what the government is hiding. And letting us have our freedom. But the BAD anonymous is the ones that hack to hack. Wich they should settle an agreetment!

By: Danny Stieben

Danny Stieben — Mon, 18 Jun 2012 03:33:02 +0000

You can also ask MUO Answers if you prefer.

By: Danny Stieben

Danny Stieben — Mon, 18 Jun 2012 03:32:46 +0000

Depends on your own personal definition of hacking. Whatever it may be, however, you can find information via a Google search.

By: biwas paudel

biwas paudel — Mon, 18 Jun 2012 01:27:01 +0000

how can i learn about hack

By: Jamiroquai

Jamiroquai — Fri, 08 Jun 2012 21:49:28 +0000

Next you’re tgoing to say that there are good Rock & Roll fans and bad ones!

By: Curio

Curio — Mon, 04 Jun 2012 20:45:55 +0000

It’s important to bear in mind that the “bad” hackers are the only ones you hear about because the “good” ones do not get caught. That is all.

By: C

Mon, 04 Jun 2012 14:38:43 +0000

Reminds me of Microsoft. Any big corporation though. You’re right, they don’t typically like it. Hence why I never even bother a government when they get compromised and the perpetrator is scanning systems like mine.

Interestingly though, I’ve notified companies that they’ve been compromised (or a customer had been) and they were very appreciated (say, hosting companies and schools [including tech schools]). How did I know? I got caught up in a scan. The scans fail minus the part of filling up logs. But everyone is the responsibility of the internet as a whole, security wise. At least in the sense of, if you’re compromised, your computer/whatever can be used to abuse others, including by spammers.

By: C

Mon, 04 Jun 2012 14:32:48 +0000

No, tor will not protect you 100%. It only obscures it and makes it harder to find. For example, its been said that the group Anonymous uses it. However, how many of them have been found by the federal governments in various countries ? Exactly.

Even spoofing is often filtered (depends; eg a server knows it won’t send out packets by its own ip, to itself. That’s what localhost is for (among other things).

In short: while being anonymous is a nice thought, in the end, it’s not really going to happen – not 100% anyway. The only ip that is anonymous is the ip that isn’t an ip.

By: Devin

Devin — Tue, 08 May 2012 14:57:49 +0000

I would say it can be my extremely 1st time vweiing your web site. I can undoubtedly write that it contains a great number of helpful points. Excellent website. I just finished mine and i was looking for some ideas and you gave me a couple of. Great read!

By: Benito

Benito — Mon, 07 May 2012 22:44:04 +0000

I would say it can be my extremely 1st time vneiiwg your web site. I can undoubtedly write that it contains a great number of helpful points. Excellent website. I just finished mine and i was looking for some ideas and you gave me a couple of. Great read!