Convenience Before Freedom: How Tech Companies Are Slowly Trapping You [Opinion]

Ads by Google

computer crimesComputers were once under our control. We could run any software we wanted on them, and the companies that manufactured the computer had no say. Today, computers are increasingly being locked down. Apple and Microsoft rule over their app stores with an iron fist, deciding what we can and can’t do with our devices. We live in a world where changing an iPad’s default web browser or email app is a crime.

This is an article about closed platforms and how they’re a plague upon the industry. This article isn’t just about Apple and their inconsistent censorship. It’s about Microsoft and how they’re phasing out the desktop in favor of the new “Modern” environment where apps can only be installed from their app store. It’s about carriers that block sideloading on Android phones, as AT&T once did. It’s about dangerous laws that make escaping these closed platforms a crime.

One Company-Controlled Store

Whether you’re using an iPhone, iPad, Windows 8 tablet, Windows RT machine, or Windows Phone, one thing is true: you can only get software for your device from an app store controlled by the company that makes your device. The company doesn’t allow just any software into their store – they have certain rules.

The problem isn’t restrictive app store rules, it’s locked-down platforms. When Microsoft or Apple block an app from their store, it means no one can actually use it.

Neither Microsoft, Apple, nor any other company that makes our devices should be the self-appointed arbiter of our morality. We should be able to freely choose the software we want to run and the content we want to view. They should be free to block things from their store, but we should also be able to go elsewhere and get them.

Ads by Google

Games Can Be Art, Too

Apple, Microsoft, and every other purveyor of a closed platform decides what content is and is not appropriate for you. While Apple doesn’t censor books, music, or movies, apps are different. Apple censors apps that contain political content, satire created by Pulitzer-prize winnersgames that challenge child labor policies in the smartphone industry as a whole, and anything they just don’t like. “We view apps different than books or songs,” Apple’s guidelines state bluntly.

But games can be art, too. While the mainstream game industry is stuck in a rut, there are indie developers constantly pushing the boundaries of what is a game and what is art. On Apple’s iOS, developers have to self-censor. if they don’t censor themselves, their apps are refused.

Microsoft is doing the same thing. When Windows 8 was released, the Windows Store refused to include games that had a PEGI 16+ rating — a category that includes games such as Skyrim. Microsoft had decided to prevent a large category of games from ever running in the Modern environment on Windows 8. Microsoft backed off on this restriction after taking a beating in the gaming press, but they tried to slip it past us. Is it any wonder that developers from Valve to Blizzard to Notch (creator of Minecraft) see Windows 8 as bad for PC gaming?

From the Smartphone to the Tablet to the Laptop

Apple bans competing web browsers from its iOS devices. You can get a competing browser, but it has to be a shell wrapped around Safari. It also can never become your default web browser. Imagine if Microsoft had this rule on Windows, years ago – only Internet Explorer 6 was allowed. Other web browsers were available, so long as they were just wrappers around Internet Explorer 6. The web as we know it would not exist – Firefox would never have been able to challenge Internet Explorer. After Microsoft stopped development on Internet Explorer, no one could have forced them to improve.

In other words: If Microsoft had the same restrictions on Windows as Apple did on iOS, Apple could have never released iTunes for Windows. Microsoft would have banned it.

Microsoft’s Windows RT shows us one possible path the future of Windows could take. The Windows RT desktop only allows applications written by Microsoft. The Modern environment only allows Microsoft-approved applications from the store – and no third-party web browsers are allowed. Windows RT devices also have locked boot loaders, so you can’t install any other operating system on them. They’re Windows RT-only, Internet Explorer-only, and Microsoft-approved software only.

This isn’t just a theoretical concern – we could have ARM-based laptops running Windows RT soon. As our own Angela wrote about her experience with Windows RT, “Despite the limitations, Windows RT is quite powerful and designed very well. It’s easy to see yourself using it on a regular basis to replace a laptop.” As ARM outcompetes Intel in power usage, Chromebooks ship with ARM chips, and Apple talks about using ARM in their Macs, the danger of Windows being locked up tight becomes more and more serious.

windows rt tablet previewEven on Windows 8, the new “Modern” environment – the future of Windows – is restricted to only Microsoft-approved applications from the Windows Store. Microsoft has a strong interest in moving away from the Windows desktop and making everyone use Windows Store-based applications. That would give them a 30% cut for all software sales on Windows.

Windows Phone also doesn’t allow you to run apps that weren’t approved by Microsoft, just like Apple’s iPhone. Apple isn’t alone, and we shouldn’t just focus on Apple – they’ve set a bad example that other companies in the industry are following.

Why Jailbreaking Isn’t a Solution

Many people shrug off these concerns, saying jailbreaking is the solution. Jailbreaking just isn’t good enough, for several reasons:

  • It took many months before a jailbreak for iOS 6was created. Apple is trying their hardest to block jailbreaking, and they’re getting better at it.
  • Many apps for jailbroken devices just don’t get made. While it would be possible for Google to write a native Google Chrome app for jailbroken devices, they never will. The market is too small and the risk of jailbreaks being blocked again is too high. The Surface RT has been jailbroken to run Windows desktop apps compiled for ARM, but only a few open-source applications are available – Adobe will never release Photoshop for jailbroken Windows RT systems.
  • Jailbreaking voids the warranty of your device, so you’re out quite a bit of cash if the hardware fails. As newer devices get better at detecting jailbreaks, this will be more of a problem.
  • Jailbreaking is a crime in many countries. This isn’t just an accident. Companies like Apple lobby to make jailbreaking a crime.

Controlling the Devices You Own Is a Crime

As if it wasn’t enough that manufacturers are locking these devices down, governments are stepping in to enforce the lock-down. In the United States, it’s legal to jailbreak a smartphone, but jailbreaking a tablet is a crime. In other words: jailbreaking your iPhone is fine, but jailbreaking your iPad makes you a criminal facing up to 5 years in jail or $500,000 in fines. If you don’t think the government would ever enforce these laws, take a look at the case of Aaron Schwartz, who committed suicide after the US government tried to nail him with a lifetime in jail for the crime of breaking a website’s terms of service. (Yes, breaking a website’s terms of service is also a crime in the United States.) Unlocking new cell phones just became illegal in the USA, too.

This isn’t just about the United States – Canada recently passed a law that makes any act of “breaking a digital lock” a crime. Jailbreaking an iPhone is a crime in Canada. International treaties like ACTA are pushing laws like this everywhere.

It’s not hard to imagine a future where all computing devices sold will be locked down. The RIAA already tried to make this happen back in 2002, with the proposed Consumer Broadband and Digital Television Promotion Act in the USA. The act would have banned any technology that could be used to view digital content without DRM. Every digital device would have been forced to include software designed to lock down the system and control what you can do with it. Penalties for violating this law would have been as high as 20 years in jail.

This would have been unworkable in an age when users had full control over their own computers, but it would now be very easy for laws to force Apple and Microsoft to include monitoring software in their devices. Governments could even pass a law forcing devices that connect to the Internet to pass certain checks, ensuring that only locked-down devices had access to the Internet. Just look at the war around SOPA – governments and large corporations will keep trying to lock down the Internet and control it.

In retrospect, Apple’s famous 1984 ad is sadly comical now that changing the default browser on an iPad is a crime.

Open Platforms

We already live in a world where more and more devices are increasingly locked down and installing your own software on them is a crime.

But all is not lost: Open platforms do exist. Android isn’t perfect, but it allows us to run the software we want without becoming criminals. (Even if Google removes an app from Google Play, you can download it from elsewhere and install it.) Microsoft hasn’t yet moved to lock down the Windows desktop the way they have with the new Modern interface and the desktop on Windows RT. Windows 8 is an open platform (the desktop) glued to a closed platform (the touch environment).

We need to support devices that keep us in control. We need to tell Microsoft that we want the future of Windows to be an open platform, just as the Windows desktop is today. We need to tell Apple that we want the ability to change our web browser and install games they may not approve of. We need to tell our governments that people should not be sent to jail for installing unapproved software on their own computers or breaking a website’s terms of service.

types of computer crimes

The Future

Apple makes amazing hardware, and the iPad is probably the best tablet out there – if only for its rich suite of apps, particularly content-creation apps that just aren’t there yet for Android tablets. Hybrid laptops that can seamlessly switch between laptop and tablet mode when necessary sound potentially awesome, if done right.

But I’ve drawn a line in the sand. I don’t want that iPad, with its criminal sanctions on doing anything Apple doesn’t approve of. I don’t want that Windows 8 machine, with its touch environment that’s locked down like an iPad. I don’t want to contribute to that future of computing that seems to be barreling down on us.

If every computer in the future is an iPad – or Microsoft’s locked-down version of an iPad – we’ll have a serious problem.

What will we say in 50 years when our grandchildren ask us what we did when our computing freedom was taken away from us, given over to large corporations and governments? “I thought the iPhone was a bit nicer than the Nexus 4”?

Image Credit: Handcuffs on Laptop via Shutterstock, Comic via XKCD, Prisoner in Old Jail Cell via Shutterstock

Join live MakeUseOf Groups on Grouvi App Join live Groups on Grouvi
Awesome Websites
Awesome Websites
420 Members
Best Anonymity Tools
Best Anonymity Tools
293 Members
Deep Web Communities
Deep Web Communities
257 Members
Tips for Privacy Obsessed
Tips for Privacy Obsessed
157 Members
Online Security Tips
Online Security Tips
147 Members
Best Music Services
Best Music Services
116 Members
Major Tech News
Major Tech News
94 Members
Jailbreaking iOS
Jailbreaking iOS
78 Members
New Security Breaches
New Security Breaches
75 Members
Windows Security
Windows Security
74 Members
Comments (53)
  • Swizzle 1

    thanks for another well written article on a volatile subject. Knowledge is power – keep writing – so that we, as readers, can pass this information on to others.

  • Wes

    I think your article is very well written, and definitely on point. I will admit I laughed my butt off when I tried to watch the video in the middle and it wouldn’t let me because it was private.

  • Terry

    Dudes, vote with ur dollars. If the likes of Apple and Microsoft try to dictate to u, buy or use something else. As the customer, u have the upper hand, the supplier is ur servant. Dont let that change.

    I refuse to buy sony, microsoft or apple products for the fact they try to dictate to me.
    Its my money, if they want it, they do what I want.
    Remember No customer = no profit.

  • Darrin Long

    its all about money thats the bottom line and companies dont want us to have free stuff because they loose out and for that matter thats any kind of company. look at it this way god give us water from the sky for free but the big dogs make us pay to use it.if this high tech stuff keep going the way its going ill just go back to communicating with people the old way meaning pen and paper or direct socializing other than over a device screen if we all had this attitude these computer comanpanys would start loosing money and then maybe they would start letting us do what ever or want to download to our devices. but seening that theres lot of lazy people out there this will never happen because they have to have things right in there reach and the tech companies make things to aid these people. sometimes i wonder if the old tv show startrek has anything to do with all the devices we use today where as in the tv show these things were fictional. but now look around you and its reaility it should be up to us to what we want with our devices because if was’nt for those of us that work hard to go and buy these products with our hard earned cash these companies would not be in business. so microsoft apple and all the above need to stop with these stupid rules……

  • Harke

    Its a consumer product. Its not a necessity. If you don’t like the product, don’t buy it. If you are overwhelmed by the constant pressuring of your peers and loved ones to buy, use and then complain about good marketing and intelligent business practices, then you’re talking to the deaf.

    You talk about computing freedom being “taken away”, but nobody is pushing $300+ dollar devices into your hands or making you pay the monthly premium to keep it connected to 4G. Nobody forces you to play games with DRM. You see a law being passed that infringes on your ability to steal high-definition pornography? Fight it. It worked with CISPA and people less lazy are fighting more and more laws like it every day. At the very bare-bones the Google Play service is free to use off their browser, Firefox, or Internet Explorer. You want “free”dom? Learn to code, get Linux or get out. The entire world is based of of a service-consumer model, the way these devices are built and the way Windows is being modeled is just adapting to society. Read that, Society, not the Economy, one makes the other. In this case, people namely, you, your family and friends want to touch big glossy screens for their productivity apps/games/pornography. If a product doesn’t provide enough freedom, there will be competitors, that’s capitalism there will always be someone to sell something someone wants. That’s how Android got into the market, its a household name now. Imagine someone competing with Steve “Tech Jesus” Jobs ten years ago! Windows 8 will either stick around, improve or go the way of Windows ME/Vista.

    Change happens, adapt and get your foot in the door do something to change the way things are give your children the avenue to have “freedom” to steal, to create to innovate, to own little bytes and bits or get out, nobody is going to wait while you wax poetic about 50 whatever from now.

    • Chris Hoffman

      What you said is true, really. I’m a writer, so writing about it is my attempt to get this idea to more people, really.

      For me, my big concern is that we could see laws like the Consumer Broadband and Digital Television Promotion Act make owning any sort of open platform illegal. (For the purposes of “stopping piracy.”) Such laws would force all devices to be closed platforms with a government rootkit that controls what you can and cannot do. Once the government gets involved with such laws, “capitalism” won’t save us because they remove choice.

    • Harke

      Extremist bills like that will never get passed, huge over-arching blanketing restrictions on what is basically the freedom to create are inherently unconstitutional and based, much like CISPA, CBDTPA is more of an empty threat than something rationally feasible as a law. The likelihood of anything like this being passed in a capitalist economy would pretty much need for more than half of the country and corporations to be deaf and unable to move, the country to not be in debt to be able to afford the enforcement of what is essentially programmer’s Big Brother. Making anything illegal is a tricky business in a country that is desperate for jobs and outsources everything.

      I’m not going to say something similar might not crop up, but it is clearly a work for attention and a common political tactic. The big scare with CISPA brought to attention the need to regulate the internet where things like child pornography, e-stalking, real-kidnapping and murder can happen. Now there is a rapport where there was none before, about the need (and there is one) to make the internet a safe public forum (because it isn’t currently and hasn’t been) within constitutional reason.

Load 10 more
Affiliate Disclamer

This review may contain affiliate links, which pays us a small compensation if you do decide to make a purchase based on our recommendation. Our judgement is in no way biased, and our recommendations are always based on the merits of the items.

For more details, please read our disclosure.
Affiliate Disclamer

This review may contain affiliate links, which pays us a small compensation if you do decide to make a purchase based on our recommendation. Our judgement is in no way biased, and our recommendations are always based on the merits of the items.

For more details, please read our disclosure.
New comment

Please login to avoid entering captcha

Log In