<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How To Restrict Access to Websites with Privoxy [Part 1]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/controlling-web-access-with-privoxy-part-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/controlling-web-access-with-privoxy-part-one/</link>
	<description>Cool Websites, Software and Internet Tips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:25:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/controlling-web-access-with-privoxy-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-394892</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 03:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=18786#comment-394892</guid>
		<description>with the default seetings, it doesn&#039;t seem to allow https of a domain that is on the whitelist? what do i need to adjust?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>with the default seetings, it doesn&#8217;t seem to allow https of a domain that is on the whitelist? what do i need to adjust?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy McDowell</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/controlling-web-access-with-privoxy-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-389769</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy McDowell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 02:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=18786#comment-389769</guid>
		<description>That does work very well and very simply, if you are only controlling the local machine. It doesn&#039;t work that great for networked machines.

Good advice for someone who shares their machine though. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That does work very well and very simply, if you are only controlling the local machine. It doesn&#8217;t work that great for networked machines.</p>
<p>Good advice for someone who shares their machine though. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James G</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/controlling-web-access-with-privoxy-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-389707</link>
		<dc:creator>James G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 15:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=18786#comment-389707</guid>
		<description>Another simple option is to modify your \Windows\System32\Drivers\etc\hosts file and add any domains you don&#039;t want to resolve to 127.0.0.1, like this:

127.0.0.1  badsite.com

Works great! And easy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another simple option is to modify your \Windows\System32\Drivers\etc\hosts file and add any domains you don&#8217;t want to resolve to 127.0.0.1, like this:</p>
<p>127.0.0.1  badsite.com</p>
<p>Works great! And easy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2009-06-13 at DeStructUred Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/controlling-web-access-with-privoxy-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-389660</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2009-06-13 at DeStructUred Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 02:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=18786#comment-389660</guid>
		<description>[...] How To Restrict Access to Websites with Privoxy [Part 1] (tags: Proxy network web sysadmin windows configuration hosting) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How To Restrict Access to Websites with Privoxy [Part 1] (tags: Proxy network web sysadmin windows configuration hosting) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy McDowell</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/controlling-web-access-with-privoxy-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-389390</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy McDowell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 03:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=18786#comment-389390</guid>
		<description>With this method, I don&#039;t think there is. Unless you set up the browser for the different groups to point to different ports. At that point, you probably have a large enough user base to have a large enough company to afford a more comprehensive package.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With this method, I don&#8217;t think there is. Unless you set up the browser for the different groups to point to different ports. At that point, you probably have a large enough user base to have a large enough company to afford a more comprehensive package.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonwu</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/controlling-web-access-with-privoxy-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-389368</link>
		<dc:creator>jonwu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 21:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=18786#comment-389368</guid>
		<description>Is there a way to use different white lists for different user groups?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a way to use different white lists for different user groups?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: makeuseof.com @ 2010-03-13 10:25:01 by W3 Total Cache -->