How Computer Technology Will Transform Schools Of The Future

Ads by Google

In the 1800’s, students sat in a classroom, listened to a teacher and took tests. In 2014, students do exactly the same thing, with maybe the addition of a pocket calculator and some slides.

Nearly every other industry has been changed beyond recognition by the invention of computers.  Why not education, arguably one of the industries with the most to gain?

The answer is probably some combination of rank incompetence, institutional conservatism, and perverse incentives.  It’s a mess, but the good news is that it’s going to change — a lot — soon.  The situation as it stands is fundamentally unsustainable, and new titans are emerging from the startup world, ready to wipe the floor with traditional academic practices.  Today, we’re going to be talking about the five biggest ideas that are going to change education more than you’d believe.



5. Virtual Reality is Going to Change Field Trips Forever

Ads by Google

Plenty of research shows that interactivity and education-by-example is one of the most important factors in educating children.  Field trips in particular seem to improve retention of knowledge and context, and improve comprehension.

Children have reduced capacity for abstract thought and a lower threshold for boredom, which means that the most effective way to teach them is to physically embody the concepts to the greatest extent possible, and to try to make sure that they’re having fun while they learn, hence the enormous popularity of hands-on children’s museums and educational games and television shows.

Students whose teachers emphasize higher-order thinking skills and hands-on learning activities outperform their peers significantly. Students who engage in hands-on learning on a weekly basis outperform those who engage in this manner of instruction on a monthly basis. Students whose teachers conduct hands-on learning activities outperform their peers by 72% of a grade level in math and 40% of a grade level in science. This study indicates that the most effective classroom practices involve conveying higher order thinking skills and engaging in hands-on learning activities.

-Education Testing Service, 2001

Unfortunately, many schools are eliminating this kind of educational content due to pressure to cut costs under programs like No Child Left Behind.

How could this tie into the recent rise of virtual reality, with the Oculus Rift?  For a relatively low cost (less than $1,000 per unit), every classroom could be provided with a few virtual reality headsets and PCs capable of driving them, which would open up immense educational opportunities.  If you want to teach a child about the solar system, the ability to physically drop them onto the surface of Mars and show them what the gravity there is like is an incredibly powerful educational tool.

If you want to teach them about dinosaurs, giving them the experience of the creatures towering over them will help to ensure that that lesson sticks.  History class could take students to recreations of ancient cities and historical events, and even math classes would benefit from the ability to generate 3D, spatial props to demonstrate abstract concepts.


Furthermore, if the software used can run in largely autonomous mode, without direct teacher supervision, we could cheaply provide inner-city students with first-class educational resources, despite a lack of funding and a deficit of competent teachers in those districts.

One compelling, life-changing educational experience may be all it takes to change the course of one inner-city student’s life for the better. That one headset and computer could replace traditional textbooks, teacher time, educational props, and field trips, which cost far more than a VR headset.

So-called “blended” elementary schools (which combine computer education with human teachers) are already coming into existence without virtual reality, and are proving to be enormously effective at improving test scores in low-income students.  Virtual reality will only make these resources more engaging and more accessible. In fact, it has the potential to turn every primary education experience into “The Magic Schoolbus.”

4. Campuses Don’t Make Sense

There’s just as much room for improvement at the college level as there is at the elementary.  It’s becoming clear, as average student debt rises, that making students pay to come live in a concrete box full of other adolescents for four years is not actually a sane use of student money, or a good way to foster a productive educational environment.

While dorm living is a rite of passage in middle-class American culture, it’s also expensive, inconvenient, and can damage the learning environment (“party schools”). Campuses are nice, but the ivy is just not pulling its weight in terms of cranking out people qualified to participate in the new global economy.  The Manpower Group reports that more than 40% of all employers can’t find enough qualified graduates to fill the jobs they have available.

We are now in the seventh year of a worldwide talent crisis. Over one-third of employers are reporting that they are unable to find the talent their organizations need, according to ManpowerGroup’s 2012 Talent Shortage Survey. This number is up from under a third, just three years ago, during the worst part of the recession. As economies improve, the talent crisis gets worse.

The expense introduced by physical campuses (which has increased more than five-fold since 1985) is simply out of reach for most low-income students.


Distance learning via a computer is increasingly a more economical and more productive option for getting an education for students on a budget.  The software available for it right now isn’t great, but if software has one notable property, it’s that it gets better over time.  And, lest you decry the loss of face-to-face lecturing, remember that…

3. Lectures Are Broken

There is no reason to believe that making teenagers wake up early, sit in a room, and listen to someone talk for an hour and a half is a productive way to get knowledge into their heads.  Making matters worse, research is where funding comes from, so the lecturers themselves are generally hired for their research ability, and not their capacity to teach.

Actually educating students is just a messy necessity for the benefit of the taxpayers, and many lecturers hate it.  The result is that, often, you’ll have classes taught in such a way that neither the professor nor the hung-over students really want to be there, and that’s not good for the students’ chances of coming away with very useful knowledge.

Khan Academy, a web service that provides online courses on topics including math, science, history, economics and even computer programming, shows exactly what’s wrong with the traditional lecture, as those of you who have used it know.  We’ve written about Khan Academy before, back in 2010, and it’s only gotten better since then.  Khan academy lectures are broken up into bite-sized videos, about five-minutes each, which teach you one concept in a succinct and simple way.  The lecturer is unseen, and the focus is on the voice and a virtual blackboard that becomes filled with illustrations demonstrating the point in question.

This format introduces crucial advantages over the traditional lecture format: if you get tired, you can stop between videos and go get a snack or take a walk.  If you get confused in a given video, you can rewind it, pause it to Google something, or otherwise consume it at your own pace and your own convenience.

The videos are short enough that fatigue isn’t an issue, and students can watch them at any time, which means when they’re awake.  Students who are confused can post questions under the video, and the lecturers (or more advanced students) can get back to them, allowing students to see not just the answers to the questions of a few classmates, but the answers to the most prevalent questions of millions of classmates.


Khan Academy is freely available everywhere on Earth, and has been translated into 24 languages by volunteers.  The goal of the nonprofit startup is to provide a world-class education everywhere on Earth, and they’re largely succeeding.

Khan Academy has six million students log on each month, making it the largest university on Earth, and is an official or unofficial part of the curriculum in 20,000 brick and mortar schools (in dozens of nations) around the world, with growth that shows no sign of stopping.  It’s also obviously the future of education. In ten years’ time, it and its competitors are going to wipe the floor with traditional colleges all over the first world.  The Economist reports that economist Alex Tabarrok believes that online universities can offer a fundamentally, economically better value proposition that brick and mortar schools.

[A]s prices converge towards marginal cost, there will be little scope for undercutting the competition. Instead MOOCs are likely to compete on quality. […] Higher production costs are a small price to pay to attract much greater numbers of students. Such markets often evolve into winner-take-all, “superstar” competitions. The best courses attract the most customers and profit handsomely as a result. In this respect online education may more closely resemble information industries such as film-making than service industries such as hair-cutting.

On the for-profit side of things, Coursera and Udacity are both cheap, online institutions that offer university-level academic and vocational courses in a variety of fields, and issue certificates that are rapidly becoming respected throughout industry.  Even the big ivy-league universities have started putting their lectures online in reasonably-sized pieces, and have seen an enormous response.

2. Robot Graders are the Future

The thing that comes along with online lessons is online assignments, which have, so far, not been that great.  Those of you who have used Mastering Physics know it as an expensive, buggy, finicky waste of everyone’s time.  However, it’s worth taking the time to see how close Mastering Physics and its ilk are to something really useful.

Instant feedback is crucial to student learning, and having a human on hand to grade every assignment in real time just isn’t practical.


Luckily, we have robots for that now.  Khan Academy includes exercises after every few lessons to let you test your knowledge of the material covered, and users instantly know whether or not they got the exercise correct, and can access hints on solving the exercise.

Users have access to an infinite number of machine-generated problems, so they can keep going until they’re sure they understand the material, and then move on.  This kind of automated homework grading is rather limited in some ways currently– it works well for math problems, and topics that can be graded via multiple choice, but less well for topics like English and programming, where creation of complex structure is a vital part of the curriculum.

1. Tutors are Better than Professors

There will always be situations, for most people, where it’s necessary to actually speak to a live human being in order to understand a topic or get feedback on an assignment.  In that case, rather than having a single full-time human employee to do this for one or two hundred students, it makes more sense to have something resembling a call center of tutors, who can use Skype, chat, and communal drawing tools to clear up points of confusion and provide feedback on assignments that computers can’t.

The technology would provide access to similar collaboration tools as are available in person, but allows tutors to constantly log in and out from all over the world. Tutors can be called as a subroutine in the software, appearing when they’re needed and vanishing when they aren’t, without the necessity of paying them for unused hours.

Tutors can pop in to give advice on a single problem, without requiring students to save up their questions and dispense them all at once when they have time to go see a tutor.  Services like these already exist, including InstaEDU and Kaplan Kids.  These services will only become more commonplace as they fill in the gaps for services like Khan Academy.

What do you think the future of education will look like? Will it become more remote and computer-centered, or will humans remain in the traditional style of classroom instruction for the foreseeable future? Share your thoughts in the comments section below!

Image credits: white robot Via Shutterstock, “Campus Lake View“, by momo & her bffs, “Forschungs Campus Garching”, by digital cat,  “Large Lecture College Classes“, by Kevin Dooley, “”Untitled“, by Renee Barron, “Homework“, by Sean, “Robot Kids Camp: Virtual Reality“, by Michael Janssen

Join live MakeUseOf Groups on Grouvi App Join live Groups on Grouvi
Learn New Skills
Learn New Skills
186 Members
Self Improvement
Self Improvement
161 Members
Latest Advances in Tech
Latest Advances in Tech
94 Members
Comments (19)
  • Carol M.

    A painless microscopic chip installed periodically will do. Learn while you eat, sleep and play. It can be programmed for down time as well. :)

  • NetTech India

    I think it has started transforming and now a days we all see students are more attracted towards technology and many of taking online education also. Soon lectures system is going to be bored for students and learning could be done by showing visuals and practical.

  • James Heywood

    An excellent and well written article. I teach English as a Second Language online to students in a developing country. So my comment is relevant only to my experience with students who are living in a country with a rather broken education system. My task is to supplement the learning that occurs within the bricks-and-mortar environment.

    Other writers have written about views that parents in developing nations and developed nations hold towards education. Developing nations often value education more because it is a necessity to improve the quality of life, not a desirable add-on. In countries like Australia, Canada and the US, you won’t starve without an education. A social safety net will catch you… you may not do too well, but you will survive. Not so in other places. The developing world is not just hungry to learn, it is ravenous, because education can improve your life drastically.

    This hunger complements developing nations’ increasingly high rates of internet penetration and usage. Students in developing nations can access some of the education they need by learning online. If the national education sector is broken, they spend their money wisely and hire the native-speaking English teacher 10,000km away.

    As a tutor, I do not think that I am better than a professor. However, my skills are now easily available to the people who want it most. Teaching online is extremely rewarding for me, and I believe it provides students with access to a better sevice. They don’t need to be in a classroom and they can take advantage of a service that is not readily available in the country in which they live. Besides this, I feel they value my service and in return I feel rewarded. I don’t teach tudents by the hundreds any more. But I am happier.

    Computer technology has not yet tranformed brick-and-mortar schools in the way is should have, but it has already transformed effectively the delivery of education for many.

  • Eduardo Souto

    It is already changing a lot!

    As an English teacher, I see technology inside the classroom every day!

    Students are already avoiding the books, they prefer Ipads, Cellphones and technological devices!

    I am open-minded, so, if there will be more technology or not in the future I intend to follow the world trends about teaching :)

    • Carol M.

      Engaging in sports, joining clubs such as “Theater Of Arts” and musical bands, etc., gives interaction with others and can aid in a structural environment. Many families offer discipline and patience by sitting in church on Sunday.

  • Denise E

    I remember being set an assignment where we thought about “schools of the future”. I imagined a school where everyone attended lessons by skype – so that neither the students nor the teachers had to leave their rooms.

    To be honest, I was pretty skeptical when I read the title, and am not sure how I feel about the article now that I’ve read it and read the ensuing comments.

    School isn’t just a place for learning about stuff like history, geography, sciences, mathematics, languages and so on. It’s also a place where students learn valuable transferrable/lifelong skills such as cooperation, communication, discipline (like getting up on time/being on time for classes, sitting down and practising something, etc..). So I don’t really like the idea of introducing learning in one’s own time, (thereby removing a degree of structure) particularly when some people need a little more encouragement to learn discipline as a life skill. Therefore I am in support of having schools remain as physical learning centres, because school isn’t just about learning facts and getting good grades, but a great place to socialise and create a sense of community. Digitising everything and allowing remote learning in itself isn’t going to destroy socialising, but it does reduce human-human interfacing. I for one would not like to sit in front of a screen all day, nor would I like my child to be doing that. It’s already bad enough with the increase of personal laptops and people spending lots of time on the internet – I think having a place and time where people actually have to interact face to face is pretty important.

    Yes, you can say, if the student doesn’t like learning, then too bad. But wait! what about kids who mature slower, and take a longer time to realise that learning is important? When I was 15, I hated learning history. 10 years later, I find that history is really interesting, and perhaps if I had sat in a history class now, I’d have fun and enjoy learning.

    Everyone is different in their learning speed and rate of maturity. Take parental pressure into consideration as well, and you will find yourself with very different individuals. Where technology might be more useful would be to get involved in tailoring learning for each individual or stratified groups of individuals based on a profile – in other words, to back up the approach where students are classed based on their abilities. Perhaps a programme that creates a very detailed and accurate profile of each student?

Load 10 more
Affiliate Disclamer

This review may contain affiliate links, which pays us a small compensation if you do decide to make a purchase based on our recommendation. Our judgement is in no way biased, and our recommendations are always based on the merits of the items.

For more details, please read our disclosure.
Affiliate Disclamer

This review may contain affiliate links, which pays us a small compensation if you do decide to make a purchase based on our recommendation. Our judgement is in no way biased, and our recommendations are always based on the merits of the items.

For more details, please read our disclosure.
New comment

Please login to avoid entering captcha

Log In