The Best Free Video Editors For Windows

Ads by Google

Video has become an incredibly common part of everyday life. People take videos on smartphones, upload them via YouTube, and share them on Facebook.

You’d think, then, that free video editors would be common, but it turns out the selection is limited for anyone not blessed with Mac OS X (and, as a result, access to iMovie). Here are the five top choices for Windows users.

Windows Movie Maker

Introduced originally in 2000, Windows Movie Maker’s peak popularity came with its release as Windows Live Movie Maker in the Windows Live Essentials software suite. Movie Maker’s development has been slow as of late, with the latest full release still carrying the name “Movie Maker 2012″, but it’s still an excellent choice.


WMM’s best feature is its ease-of-use. Video editing can be a bit confusing by nature, but WMM at least doesn’t force the user to download new codecs or browse open-source libraries. It’s a complete package from the moment it’s installed, and its linear editing interface is nearly as straightforward as iMovie.

There’s also a fair selection of features. You can add titles, introduce transition effects, add audio and adjust the volume and fade of audio, both in your video clip and in the attached audio track. File support is very broad and videos can be saved in resolutions up to 1080p.

You can download Movie Maker directly from Microsoft’s website.

Ads by Google



If you’re looking for a more serious editor, give Lightworks a look. This tool has been around since 1989 (that’s 25 years) and has been used to edit many professional movies you’ve probably watched and enjoyed, like Pulp Fiction and Braveheart.

As you might expect, this professional-grade editor comes with a professional-grade learning curve. This is a non-linear editor, which means it is not based on a simple A-to-B video timeline. That makes advanced edits easier, but thoroughly confuses newbies. Add tons of effects and multi-cam editing and you’ve got one heck of a nut to crack. If you manage it, though, you’ll be able to create videos of higher quality than most other free editors.

The free version, unfortunately, comes with a few caveats, the most problematic being a lack of 1080p output. Free users can only output at 720p, which could be a major turn-off. If that doesn’t bother you, though, Lightworks is a solid choice.


Avidemux is a free, open source video editor also available for Linux and Mac OS X. The software was originally released several years ago and has been updated consistently, with the latest coming about six months prior to this article’s publication.


This program represents a half-step between very serious software, like Lightworks, and a basic video editor like Movie Maker. Non-linear editing is supported, subtitles can be added, and the software’s file format lets users save all the settings associated with a project, which can be re-applied to another project. Scripting is available through the GUI or directly through a command line. Virtually all major video and audio formats are supported for input and most are supported for output, though WMV and QuickTime are absent.

You can grab Avidemux from the developer’s website, which includes a link to a wiki and forums that will help you become familiar with the software.

YouTube Editor

You don’t have to download software to make basic edits to a video. YouTube has its own web-based editor that is simple but handy – if you’re intending to upload to YouTube, of course.

Any video you upload can be edited regardless of format and resolution. The editing process is linear, so it’s similar to iMovie and Windows Movie Maker, and the video and audio tracks can be edited individually.


One of the most useful features this editor offers is access to YouTube’s library of Creative Commons videos and music. You can put them right into your video without downloading them. There’s a small selection of transitions and text options, though not enough for anything close to professional editing.

The biggest downside, of course, is the fact you can only edit YouTube videos. Theoretically you could then re-download them for use elsewhere with a YouTube video ripping tool, but at that point you’d likely be better served by Movie Maker.

VSDC Free Video Editor

This appropriately titled editor is another solid choice for people who want a semi-professional option without having to pay a professional price tag. A non-linear editor, VSDC allows for advanced editing techniques. The software also supports a very broad range of video and audio effects like color correction, blur reduction and volume correction.


Though still confusing for the novice, the basic interface of VSDC is a bit easier to grasp than that of Lightworks, thanks to a front-end that mimics the Microsoft ribbon interface and has a more conventional workflow.

One nice extra that may elevate VSDC above the free version of Lightworks is video output support for 1080p at 30 FPS, which is much better than its competitor’s 720p limitation. The installer is also a rather compact 26 megabytes, about three times smaller than Lightworks. On the downside, though, the installation process (which include’s CNET’s downloader) prompts the user several times to install adware – be wary of these requests!


These five video editors represent the best Windows users can download today. Of them Movie Maker probably has the widest appeal, but Avidemux and VSDC Free Video Editor may also please amateurs looking for something a bit more capable.

What’s your favorite free Windows video editor? Let us know in the comments.

Image Credits: video editing Via Shutterstock

Join live MakeUseOf Groups on Grouvi App Join live Groups on Grouvi
Web for Kids
Web for Kids
19 Members
Deep Web Communities
Deep Web Communities
32 Members
Awesome Websites
Awesome Websites
64 Members
Best Music Services
Best Music Services
25 Members
Ads by Google
Comments (42)
  • Al Wal

    Lightworks isn’t free

  • vasco dada

    Lightworks brings so many errors that orevent it to launch. Its a waste of time downloading such a huge file, that will then after fail to install, with numerous stages of errors

  • vasco dada

    Lightworks brings so many errors that orevent it to launch. Its a waste of time downloading such a huge file, that will then after fail to install, with numerous stages of errors

  • 1luckymama

    I was thinking of giving one of these a go, either lightworks or blender seems to be the way to go.They just make it sound scary with this steep learning curve business,that’s the only thing putting me off.
    I purchased corel prox3 a couple of years ago at first it was good then it kept crashing every time I went to render a movie.So then I tried the updated prox7 and the same thing,it started crashing when I would render a movie.It has been so frustrating as I have spent hours editing and making a movie then to have the whole thing not render Arhhhh………
    prox7 has a thing called smart package ,I thought I could just save the movie and render it on another video editing site,but all the overlays and effects won’t transfer etc.
    Some of these review sites will tell you that corel prox7 is a good programme,but if you look up all the people trying to get help from the programme you’ll see the frustration.
    happy editing everyone,good luck.

  • Tom W

    I’ve been using VSDC for a few weeks now, and there seems to be a lot of little bugs that get in the way when I’m trying to use it. The most puzzling is that it won’t let me create a video with a custom resolution of 1600×900, I can only do 1600×896 or 1600×904.

    I installed LightWorks today, and it looks like it could be very good. I haven’t had time to edit anything properly yet, so I don’t know if it has all of the features that VSDC has.

    • kernmapper

      896 and 904 are both numbers that are evenly divisible by 8 (the number of bits in a byte). This indicates a possible limitation or requirement of something in the processing technology or the digital data stream, such as a particular video format or codec.
      I’m no video expert, but multiples of 8 come up quite frequently in computing.
      An example would be a JPEG photo. Some software is capable of performing a “lossless JPEG rotation”, where a JPEG image is rotated and re-saved without losing any image quality. During such a rotation, the image dimensions will be adjusted to even multiples of 8 (if necessary), possibly resulting in a slight cropping of the image (which is usually imperceptible to the eye with modern high-resolution digital camera images). This cropping occurs because the rotation algorithm subdivides the image into 8×8 pixel blocks (Minimum Coded Units), and any extra pixel rows are discarded.
      It is highly probable that certain video files are subject to these limitations as well. After all, a video is just a series of still images.

    • Scutterman

      While that kind of makes sense, it is a restriction that doesn’t appear to be in any other video editing programme. I even recall using Windows Movie Maker for adding sound to a track that I’d already edited and rendered and that seemed to handle it just fine.

      Either way, I had to move away from VSDC eventually. It would constantly crash when the it got to the end of the video, even during rendering. Half of the time it would fully render, then crash before saving to the file. I moved onto the paid Sony Movie Studio and it’s allowed me to edit much faster.

Load 10 more
Affiliate Disclamer

This review may contain affiliate links, which pays us a small compensation if you do decide to make a purchase based on our recommendation. Our judgement is in no way biased, and our recommendations are always based on the merits of the items.

For more details, please read our disclosure.
Affiliate Disclamer

This review may contain affiliate links, which pays us a small compensation if you do decide to make a purchase based on our recommendation. Our judgement is in no way biased, and our recommendations are always based on the merits of the items.

For more details, please read our disclosure.