<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Audio File Formats Explained in Simple Terms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/a-look-at-the-different-file-formats-available-part-1-audio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/a-look-at-the-different-file-formats-available-part-1-audio/</link>
	<description>Cool Websites, Software and Internet Tips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelina</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/a-look-at-the-different-file-formats-available-part-1-audio/#comment-396446</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 07:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=20927#comment-396446</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve actually read a couple articles that said the average listener can&#039;t tell the difference between 256 kb/s and 320 kb/s, so I think for the average listener 256kb/s is probably enough. However, if you have the disk space to spare, then why not go with a higher bitrate, just to.. yknow, kick in the psychological &quot;i&#039;m listening to better quality files&quot; mindset?

^__^
or maybe I just find high bitrates unnecessary because I have a hard time telling between 128kb/s and 320kb/s LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve actually read a couple articles that said the average listener can&#8217;t tell the difference between 256 kb/s and 320 kb/s, so I think for the average listener 256kb/s is probably enough. However, if you have the disk space to spare, then why not go with a higher bitrate, just to.. yknow, kick in the psychological &#8220;i&#8217;m listening to better quality files&#8221; mindset?</p>
<p>^__^<br />
or maybe I just find high bitrates unnecessary because I have a hard time telling between 128kb/s and 320kb/s LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelina</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/a-look-at-the-different-file-formats-available-part-1-audio/#comment-396444</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 07:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=20927#comment-396444</guid>
		<description>are you referring to WMA? WMV is windows media VIDEO

unless you&#039;re being sarcastic and I&#039;ve missed it entirely =&#124;

I&#039;d say it definitely depends on the situation, and what the audio is being used for. If it&#039;s just for casual listening, and the listener is not a super audiophile, then sure, whatever floats your boat. However, if it&#039;s for archival purposes, or for production purposes, I wouldn&#039;t say WMA is the ideal format to go with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>are you referring to WMA? WMV is windows media VIDEO</p>
<p>unless you&#8217;re being sarcastic and I&#8217;ve missed it entirely =|</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say it definitely depends on the situation, and what the audio is being used for. If it&#8217;s just for casual listening, and the listener is not a super audiophile, then sure, whatever floats your boat. However, if it&#8217;s for archival purposes, or for production purposes, I wouldn&#8217;t say WMA is the ideal format to go with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelina</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/a-look-at-the-different-file-formats-available-part-1-audio/#comment-396443</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 07:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=20927#comment-396443</guid>
		<description>I poked around in the archives, and unfortunately, didn&#039;t find anything specific to camstudio settings. However, since Camstudio uses its own codec that (allegedly) produces better quality files at a smaller file size, you can probably just play with the settings and figure out what works for you (and it wouldn&#039;t be as complicated as, say, picking WHICH codec and which format to use).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I poked around in the archives, and unfortunately, didn&#8217;t find anything specific to camstudio settings. However, since Camstudio uses its own codec that (allegedly) produces better quality files at a smaller file size, you can probably just play with the settings and figure out what works for you (and it wouldn&#8217;t be as complicated as, say, picking WHICH codec and which format to use).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelina</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/a-look-at-the-different-file-formats-available-part-1-audio/#comment-396441</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 06:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=20927#comment-396441</guid>
		<description>LOL clever way to put it 

.PNG is an image file

I  actually got really confused, and then attempted to look up &quot;PNG Audio&quot; on Google =[</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL clever way to put it </p>
<p>.PNG is an image file</p>
<p>I  actually got really confused, and then attempted to look up &#8220;PNG Audio&#8221; on Google =[</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelina</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/a-look-at-the-different-file-formats-available-part-1-audio/#comment-396440</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 06:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=20927#comment-396440</guid>
		<description>AH i&#039;m sorry &gt;&lt; I must have gotten confused. WAV and Redbook are both encoded in PCM format, and somewhere in the middle I probably mixed them up. AHH sorry for the [accidental] misinformation!

Also regarding AIFF/WAV being able to hold compressed audio, yes, that is true, but I tried to focus on the most commonly used/seen formats, which for WAV, is entirely uncompressed.

Thanks for your really good point about Red Book though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AH i&#8217;m sorry >< I must have gotten confused. WAV and Redbook are both encoded in PCM format, and somewhere in the middle I probably mixed them up. AHH sorry for the [accidental] misinformation!</p>
<p>Also regarding AIFF/WAV being able to hold compressed audio, yes, that is true, but I tried to focus on the most commonly used/seen formats, which for WAV, is entirely uncompressed.</p>
<p>Thanks for your really good point about Red Book though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chetan Sachdev</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/a-look-at-the-different-file-formats-available-part-1-audio/#comment-395992</link>
		<dc:creator>Chetan Sachdev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=20927#comment-395992</guid>
		<description>I enjoyed reading this article. I would like to have an article on Camstudio settings related to compression and having a good quality video with less size. Is there any article available for Camstudio settings ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed reading this article. I would like to have an article on Camstudio settings related to compression and having a good quality video with less size. Is there any article available for Camstudio settings ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/a-look-at-the-different-file-formats-available-part-1-audio/#comment-395921</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 08:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=20927#comment-395921</guid>
		<description>But Winamp does support OGG natively :o Most good players support OGG.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But Winamp does support OGG natively <img src="http://main.makeuseoflimited.netdna-cdn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif?323f2c" alt=':o' class='wp-smiley' />  Most good players support OGG.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jalley</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/a-look-at-the-different-file-formats-available-part-1-audio/#comment-395796</link>
		<dc:creator>Jalley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=20927#comment-395796</guid>
		<description>I actively pursue FLAC files when searching for downloads. The files are large, yes, but with increasingly speedy broadband, the extra time is fairly negligible. Also, Monkey&#039;s Audio (.ape) is a standout lossless compression program similar to FLAC; it works nicely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actively pursue FLAC files when searching for downloads. The files are large, yes, but with increasingly speedy broadband, the extra time is fairly negligible. Also, Monkey&#8217;s Audio (.ape) is a standout lossless compression program similar to FLAC; it works nicely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kaz</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/a-look-at-the-different-file-formats-available-part-1-audio/#comment-395779</link>
		<dc:creator>kaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 05:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=20927#comment-395779</guid>
		<description>PNG... I take it you&#039;re a synesthete?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PNG&#8230; I take it you&#8217;re a synesthete?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aarne</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/a-look-at-the-different-file-formats-available-part-1-audio/#comment-395754</link>
		<dc:creator>Aarne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 01:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=20927#comment-395754</guid>
		<description>.WMV is for video and .WMA for audio? Or am I confusing formats and file extensions?

What about .PNG?

Otherwise, Great info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.WMV is for video and .WMA for audio? Or am I confusing formats and file extensions?</p>
<p>What about .PNG?</p>
<p>Otherwise, Great info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached (Requested URI is rejected)
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.011 seconds using apc
Object Caching 303/304 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via main.makeuseoflimited.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.makeuseof.com @ 2012-02-11 06:58:47 -->
