<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 6 Websites to Track A Website&#8217;s Traffic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/6-websites-to-track-a-websites-traffic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/6-websites-to-track-a-websites-traffic/</link>
	<description>Cool Websites, Software and Internet Tips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:51:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Cola</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/6-websites-to-track-a-websites-traffic/#comment-431947</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Cola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=24717#comment-431947</guid>
		<description>The reason for the inaccuracy of numbers is because each of the sites above have a different way of measuring site data, and the period of the data may be over a specific time period.

For example, Google Adplanner calculates its unique visitors using Cookies over a specific month. If users delete there browser cookies, you can see it will shower higher.

If you look where Complete gets its information from, they say: 
&quot;Compete applies a rigorous normalization methodology, leveraging scientific multi-dimensional scaling to ensure metrics are representative of the U.S. Internet population. Compete members are recruited through multiple sources to ensure a diverse distribution of user types and to facilitate de-biasing across the data sources. Compete&#039;s standard normalization process is applied to our monthly and weekly metrics. Compete relies on share based measures to report its daily metrics.&quot;
which again, is complete different from Adplanner.

You also have to make sure that you when your comparing data, you are comparing US to US, not US to Everything.

I hope this answers your questions to why the results are different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason for the inaccuracy of numbers is because each of the sites above have a different way of measuring site data, and the period of the data may be over a specific time period.</p>
<p>For example, Google Adplanner calculates its unique visitors using Cookies over a specific month. If users delete there browser cookies, you can see it will shower higher.</p>
<p>If you look where Complete gets its information from, they say:<br />
&#8220;Compete applies a rigorous normalization methodology, leveraging scientific multi-dimensional scaling to ensure metrics are representative of the U.S. Internet population. Compete members are recruited through multiple sources to ensure a diverse distribution of user types and to facilitate de-biasing across the data sources. Compete&#8217;s standard normalization process is applied to our monthly and weekly metrics. Compete relies on share based measures to report its daily metrics.&#8221;<br />
which again, is complete different from Adplanner.</p>
<p>You also have to make sure that you when your comparing data, you are comparing US to US, not US to Everything.</p>
<p>I hope this answers your questions to why the results are different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miss G</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/6-websites-to-track-a-websites-traffic/#comment-431883</link>
		<dc:creator>Miss G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 17:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=24717#comment-431883</guid>
		<description>Actually, I went to this site and it didn&#039;t even have our site within the search.  This was disappointing and inaccurate as we have a 15k rating on Alexa and bizinformation.org values us around 450k.  So, I think Estimix sux.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I went to this site and it didn&#8217;t even have our site within the search.  This was disappointing and inaccurate as we have a 15k rating on Alexa and bizinformation.org values us around 450k.  So, I think Estimix sux.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: free classifieds directory</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/6-websites-to-track-a-websites-traffic/#comment-422178</link>
		<dc:creator>free classifieds directory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=24717#comment-422178</guid>
		<description>Winder why there is a huge difference using those tool?
Who is more accurate?

Sincerely,
Alexander</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Winder why there is a huge difference using those tool?<br />
Who is more accurate?</p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
Alexander</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WebTraffic</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/6-websites-to-track-a-websites-traffic/#comment-412461</link>
		<dc:creator>WebTraffic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 09:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=24717#comment-412461</guid>
		<description>Great stuff. Web traffic is something everyone would love.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff. Web traffic is something everyone would love.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefanos</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/6-websites-to-track-a-websites-traffic/#comment-410663</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefanos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 20:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=24717#comment-410663</guid>
		<description>There is a huge difference between the traffic estimation as provided by Alexa comparing it to compete and quantcast. I believe compete and quantcast are more reliable.Any thoughts about that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a huge difference between the traffic estimation as provided by Alexa comparing it to compete and quantcast. I believe compete and quantcast are more reliable.Any thoughts about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xaby</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/6-websites-to-track-a-websites-traffic/#comment-409949</link>
		<dc:creator>xaby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 08:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=24717#comment-409949</guid>
		<description>very very helpful! TQ TQ!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very very helpful! TQ TQ!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Designing</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/6-websites-to-track-a-websites-traffic/#comment-409796</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Designing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 09:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=24717#comment-409796</guid>
		<description>Exactly, all alexa stuff is based on their engine. Personally I wont recommend relying over Alexa ranks and other things. There are good alternatives too as you mentioned.

- J.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cyberdesignz.com&quot; title=&quot;Web Designing&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Web Designing&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly, all alexa stuff is based on their engine. Personally I wont recommend relying over Alexa ranks and other things. There are good alternatives too as you mentioned.</p>
<p>- J.<br />
<a href="http://www.cyberdesignz.com" title="Web Designing" rel="nofollow">Web Designing</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nir</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/6-websites-to-track-a-websites-traffic/#comment-409790</link>
		<dc:creator>nir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 08:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=24717#comment-409790</guid>
		<description>Nice list. Another site that can be added to the list is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.beencounter.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;beencounter&lt;/a&gt;. With beencounter you can know which sites your visitors have been to.  You can see if visitors have been to your competitors site and even use an API to show them personalized content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice list. Another site that can be added to the list is <a href="http://www.beencounter.com/" rel="nofollow">beencounter</a>. With beencounter you can know which sites your visitors have been to.  You can see if visitors have been to your competitors site and even use an API to show them personalized content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GDevelop</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/6-websites-to-track-a-websites-traffic/#comment-409509</link>
		<dc:creator>GDevelop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 08:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=24717#comment-409509</guid>
		<description>This is really a helpful resource for me.
Thanx for this post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really a helpful resource for me.<br />
Thanx for this post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LadySiren</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/6-websites-to-track-a-websites-traffic/#comment-408869</link>
		<dc:creator>LadySiren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=24717#comment-408869</guid>
		<description>Wow, thanks VERY much for posting this info - it&#039;s incredibly helpful!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, thanks VERY much for posting this info &#8211; it&#8217;s incredibly helpful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached (Requested URI is rejected)
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.027 seconds using apc
Object Caching 299/300 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via main.makeuseoflimited.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.makeuseof.com @ 2012-02-11 04:20:19 -->
