<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 4 Torrenting Pitfalls To Avoid &#8211; And What To Do Instead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/4-torrenting-pitfalls-to-avoid-and-what-to-do-instead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/4-torrenting-pitfalls-to-avoid-and-what-to-do-instead/</link>
	<description>Cool Websites, Software and Internet Tips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ujjwol</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/4-torrenting-pitfalls-to-avoid-and-what-to-do-instead/#comment-408803</link>
		<dc:creator>Ujjwol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 03:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=9941#comment-408803</guid>
		<description>How to take screenshot of the webpage as shown of the Pirate Bay in this post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How to take screenshot of the webpage as shown of the Pirate Bay in this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/4-torrenting-pitfalls-to-avoid-and-what-to-do-instead/#comment-376257</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 01:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=9941#comment-376257</guid>
		<description>Use a html blocker i.e. peerguardian2 to make sure no one can see what you&#039;re doing on your computer and always make sure to read comments on torrents, if the feedback is good then it&#039;s a pretty safe bet there isn&#039;t a trojan in there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Use a html blocker i.e. peerguardian2 to make sure no one can see what you&#8217;re doing on your computer and always make sure to read comments on torrents, if the feedback is good then it&#8217;s a pretty safe bet there isn&#8217;t a trojan in there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: krugle</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/4-torrenting-pitfalls-to-avoid-and-what-to-do-instead/#comment-376227</link>
		<dc:creator>krugle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=9941#comment-376227</guid>
		<description>rule 3 its true but also not true yes you should be aware of rar files to an extent with simple movie files yah you should probly not download it however for tv series and iso files its very common to do so infact not downloading that way is a good way to get pinged by ur isp if your not using peerguardian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rule 3 its true but also not true yes you should be aware of rar files to an extent with simple movie files yah you should probly not download it however for tv series and iso files its very common to do so infact not downloading that way is a good way to get pinged by ur isp if your not using peerguardian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexandre</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/4-torrenting-pitfalls-to-avoid-and-what-to-do-instead/#comment-376209</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexandre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 20:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=9941#comment-376209</guid>
		<description>Totally agree with Charax. Your #3 rule is bad advice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree with Charax. Your #3 rule is bad advice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FL</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/4-torrenting-pitfalls-to-avoid-and-what-to-do-instead/#comment-366393</link>
		<dc:creator>FL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=9941#comment-366393</guid>
		<description>I disagree &#039;Donâ€™t Download Archives&#039;. I personally prefer archives, because:
1. in the case of data, the resulting file is smaller in size, hence quicker to download. in the case of media see the following point.
2. they provide an extra error checking on extract, so that I know that I have exactly what it should be, as you know a single bit can crash a program.
3. when you are talking about multi GiB stuff, e.g. movies, it allows to split into sensible size, so that I can split my download location and even my download progress (download the first 500MiB, say, than the next, so on) when I have limited storage.
4. timestamps are also preserved, which I am very passion about. which I find very useful when there is just so many different versions around.

I have once downloaded a multi series show 22GiB in avi&#039;s. turned out a few have errors and wouldn&#039;t play, which I had to download and redownload the bug-free ones. I just don&#039;t trust the bt error checking, and who know what other people might have swapped a different file to be redistributing. lucky that I tested them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree &#8216;Donâ€™t Download Archives&#8217;. I personally prefer archives, because:<br />
1. in the case of data, the resulting file is smaller in size, hence quicker to download. in the case of media see the following point.<br />
2. they provide an extra error checking on extract, so that I know that I have exactly what it should be, as you know a single bit can crash a program.<br />
3. when you are talking about multi GiB stuff, e.g. movies, it allows to split into sensible size, so that I can split my download location and even my download progress (download the first 500MiB, say, than the next, so on) when I have limited storage.<br />
4. timestamps are also preserved, which I am very passion about. which I find very useful when there is just so many different versions around.</p>
<p>I have once downloaded a multi series show 22GiB in avi&#8217;s. turned out a few have errors and wouldn&#8217;t play, which I had to download and redownload the bug-free ones. I just don&#8217;t trust the bt error checking, and who know what other people might have swapped a different file to be redistributing. lucky that I tested them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackew</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/4-torrenting-pitfalls-to-avoid-and-what-to-do-instead/#comment-365943</link>
		<dc:creator>jackew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 01:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=9941#comment-365943</guid>
		<description>Speed of download has been my problem. I have Earthlink with 1.5MB broadband, but it&#039;s not unusual to take, literally, days to download. I understand the ISPs sometimes interfere with torrents. Is Earthlink one such? And if so, any other recommendations?

jackew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speed of download has been my problem. I have Earthlink with 1.5MB broadband, but it&#8217;s not unusual to take, literally, days to download. I understand the ISPs sometimes interfere with torrents. Is Earthlink one such? And if so, any other recommendations?</p>
<p>jackew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolf</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/4-torrenting-pitfalls-to-avoid-and-what-to-do-instead/#comment-365879</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 11:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=9941#comment-365879</guid>
		<description>Your archive reasoning leaves me stumped.

Any application file can and will be reduced in size when archived. Not only that, but a great deal of the private torrenting sites have ratios, and will hammer you if you put up full size files. Torrenting is a great resource and if all ppl did not archive files, the loads on trackers would be horrendous. With torrenting, the smaller you can make the file, the better off you are: both for the seeders and the leechers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your archive reasoning leaves me stumped.</p>
<p>Any application file can and will be reduced in size when archived. Not only that, but a great deal of the private torrenting sites have ratios, and will hammer you if you put up full size files. Torrenting is a great resource and if all ppl did not archive files, the loads on trackers would be horrendous. With torrenting, the smaller you can make the file, the better off you are: both for the seeders and the leechers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: g</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/4-torrenting-pitfalls-to-avoid-and-what-to-do-instead/#comment-365865</link>
		<dc:creator>g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 06:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=9941#comment-365865</guid>
		<description>i noticed one of my favorite torrent uploaders - axxo, had some dufus uploading a bunch of fakes in his name.  funny thing is they were the most seeded/leached torrents at the time.

i suggest if you are new to torrents to hang around awhile and get a feel for who&#039;s who.  when i first started, i jumped right in and ended up downloading the wrong stuff a few times (fakes, virus embedded, etc) until i figured out who had the best content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i noticed one of my favorite torrent uploaders &#8211; axxo, had some dufus uploading a bunch of fakes in his name.  funny thing is they were the most seeded/leached torrents at the time.</p>
<p>i suggest if you are new to torrents to hang around awhile and get a feel for who&#8217;s who.  when i first started, i jumped right in and ended up downloading the wrong stuff a few times (fakes, virus embedded, etc) until i figured out who had the best content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy Mann</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/4-torrenting-pitfalls-to-avoid-and-what-to-do-instead/#comment-365848</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy Mann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 03:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=9941#comment-365848</guid>
		<description>Hey i would definitely disagree with your archiving suggestion and agree with Charax.  I have downloaded multiple torrents which were archived in such a manner without any trouble or worry.  The reasoning for this type of compression is 2 fold.  First, It will allow for a smaller file size for the transmitted data, granted not by much for video but if you are looking at very large file sizes every bit helps.  Secondly, as Charax mentioned you could fix a corruption issue in a single of the files by redownloading just that one piece.  However this is not as big an issue in BitTorrent because pieces are verified as they are downloaded.

Another thing about miltiple rar files.  If you have a modern version of your compression software you should only have to tell it to extract the first file and the software should automatically extract from all the subsequent rar files if they are present.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey i would definitely disagree with your archiving suggestion and agree with Charax.  I have downloaded multiple torrents which were archived in such a manner without any trouble or worry.  The reasoning for this type of compression is 2 fold.  First, It will allow for a smaller file size for the transmitted data, granted not by much for video but if you are looking at very large file sizes every bit helps.  Secondly, as Charax mentioned you could fix a corruption issue in a single of the files by redownloading just that one piece.  However this is not as big an issue in BitTorrent because pieces are verified as they are downloaded.</p>
<p>Another thing about miltiple rar files.  If you have a modern version of your compression software you should only have to tell it to extract the first file and the software should automatically extract from all the subsequent rar files if they are present.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/4-torrenting-pitfalls-to-avoid-and-what-to-do-instead/#comment-365841</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 02:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=9941#comment-365841</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s no reason to make a 43 or 50+ file archive of a video, there&#039;s no benefit to the compression (there&#039;s no compression at all actually).  Most of the ones I see that are like that are passworded or bogus.  The &quot;good&quot; ones are straight up avi&#039;s or iso&#039;s or the actual video contens (folders).  One thing to also check is that people will tend to release stuff that isn&#039;t theirs, and they label it as a well known group.  Just went to usniff and found about 20 torrents that claim to be from a well known group, but they are all bogus.  So be wary, and look for a large amount of seeders, and ALWAYS read the comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no reason to make a 43 or 50+ file archive of a video, there&#8217;s no benefit to the compression (there&#8217;s no compression at all actually).  Most of the ones I see that are like that are passworded or bogus.  The &#8220;good&#8221; ones are straight up avi&#8217;s or iso&#8217;s or the actual video contens (folders).  One thing to also check is that people will tend to release stuff that isn&#8217;t theirs, and they label it as a well known group.  Just went to usniff and found about 20 torrents that claim to be from a well known group, but they are all bogus.  So be wary, and look for a large amount of seeders, and ALWAYS read the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached (Requested URI is rejected)
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.006 seconds using apc
Object Caching 299/300 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via main.makeuseoflimited.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.makeuseof.com @ 2012-02-11 02:35:42 -->
