<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 10+ Firefox Addons To Enhance Google Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/10-firefox-addons-to-enhance-google-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/10-firefox-addons-to-enhance-google-search/</link>
	<description>Cool Websites, Software and Internet Tips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:28:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noicroek</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/10-firefox-addons-to-enhance-google-search/#comment-427096</link>
		<dc:creator>Noicroek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 07:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=17861#comment-427096</guid>
		<description>uh... bookmarked thread.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uh&#8230; bookmarked thread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Molly</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/10-firefox-addons-to-enhance-google-search/#comment-388273</link>
		<dc:creator>Molly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 18:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=17861#comment-388273</guid>
		<description>Great information in the article and the comments. As an online research assistant, I use search extensively for business. My favorites are of course, Google, it&#039;s add-on DeeperWeb and SurfCanyon. I have a few narrower specific engines for topics I research more often and/or deeply, but usually those three get me where I need to go pretty quickly.
I&#039;ve found that using scripts to enhance other search engines is counter productive when I can access one that works just as well w/o monkeying with it. Of course I&#039;m not a programmer so may not be doing that part right. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great information in the article and the comments. As an online research assistant, I use search extensively for business. My favorites are of course, Google, it&#8217;s add-on DeeperWeb and SurfCanyon. I have a few narrower specific engines for topics I research more often and/or deeply, but usually those three get me where I need to go pretty quickly.<br />
I&#8217;ve found that using scripts to enhance other search engines is counter productive when I can access one that works just as well w/o monkeying with it. Of course I&#8217;m not a programmer so may not be doing that part right. <img src="http://main.makeuseoflimited.netdna-cdn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif?323f2c" alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: derek</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/10-firefox-addons-to-enhance-google-search/#comment-387462</link>
		<dc:creator>derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 19:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=17861#comment-387462</guid>
		<description>Personally i use greasemonkey script called Google FX http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/31950</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally i use greasemonkey script called Google FX <a href="http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/31950" rel="nofollow">http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/31950</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Srinivas G</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/10-firefox-addons-to-enhance-google-search/#comment-387394</link>
		<dc:creator>Srinivas G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 02:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=17861#comment-387394</guid>
		<description>Oops!...sorry.....wrong comment...!!...I am new to this reply notifications thing, and when notified via e-mail....I thought it was @ me.... :D .....Apologies Mark@Surfcanyon....!! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops!&#8230;sorry&#8230;..wrong comment&#8230;!!&#8230;I am new to this reply notifications thing, and when notified via e-mail&#8230;.I thought it was @ me&#8230;. <img src="http://main.makeuseoflimited.netdna-cdn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif?323f2c" alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  &#8230;..Apologies Mark@Surfcanyon&#8230;.!! <img src="http://main.makeuseoflimited.netdna-cdn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif?323f2c" alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Brandt</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/10-firefox-addons-to-enhance-google-search/#comment-387380</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Brandt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 23:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=17861#comment-387380</guid>
		<description>mojo, instead of this for Scroogle ssl:
https://ssl.scroogle.org/cgi-bin/nbbw.cgi?Gw=%s 

you may want to use this for Scroogle ssl:
https://ssl.scroogle.org/cgi-bin/nbbwssl.cgi?Gw=%s

The difference is that nbbwssl.cgi catches a flag that tells the Scroogle program to stay in ssl mode when you do subsequent searches from the Scroogle results page. Otherwise, subsequent searches from the input form on the Scroogle results page will be non-ssl. Apart from this, the nbbw.cgi and nbbwssl.cgi programs are identical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mojo, instead of this for Scroogle ssl:<br />
<a href="https://ssl.scroogle.org/cgi-bin/nbbw.cgi?Gw=%s" rel="nofollow">https://ssl.scroogle.org/cgi-bin/nbbw.cgi?Gw=%s</a> </p>
<p>you may want to use this for Scroogle ssl:<br />
<a href="https://ssl.scroogle.org/cgi-bin/nbbwssl.cgi?Gw=%s" rel="nofollow">https://ssl.scroogle.org/cgi-bin/nbbwssl.cgi?Gw=%s</a></p>
<p>The difference is that nbbwssl.cgi catches a flag that tells the Scroogle program to stay in ssl mode when you do subsequent searches from the Scroogle results page. Otherwise, subsequent searches from the input form on the Scroogle results page will be non-ssl. Apart from this, the nbbw.cgi and nbbwssl.cgi programs are identical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Rinsky</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/10-firefox-addons-to-enhance-google-search/#comment-387364</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Rinsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 19:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=17861#comment-387364</guid>
		<description>Thanks for mentioning us in your article.
Use our Tag Cloud for results navigation and our Topic Mapping Technologies for immediate access to Wikipedia, Answers, News, Metrics, Blog Search and more:

http://www.DeeperWeb.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for mentioning us in your article.<br />
Use our Tag Cloud for results navigation and our Topic Mapping Technologies for immediate access to Wikipedia, Answers, News, Metrics, Blog Search and more:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.DeeperWeb.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.DeeperWeb.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Srinivas G</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/10-firefox-addons-to-enhance-google-search/#comment-387359</link>
		<dc:creator>Srinivas G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 18:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=17861#comment-387359</guid>
		<description>Well....that&#039;s a good question u asked....and let me tell you....yes.....It may slow down the browser....but not significantly, though....If u are ready to sacrifice a little speed for extensibility (like we all do!)....then go for it....:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230;.that&#8217;s a good question u asked&#8230;.and let me tell you&#8230;.yes&#8230;..It may slow down the browser&#8230;.but not significantly, though&#8230;.If u are ready to sacrifice a little speed for extensibility (like we all do!)&#8230;.then go for it&#8230;.:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Srinivas G</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/10-firefox-addons-to-enhance-google-search/#comment-387354</link>
		<dc:creator>Srinivas G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 17:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=17861#comment-387354</guid>
		<description>Thanks Mark...:)....and guess what...I&#039;ve offered to write for ur blog ( I sure have a few things up my sleeve :D )...Surfcanyon does look cool...thanks for it,, once again....I&#039;ll try that a.s.a.p....:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Mark&#8230;:)&#8230;.and guess what&#8230;I&#8217;ve offered to write for ur blog ( I sure have a few things up my sleeve <img src="http://main.makeuseoflimited.netdna-cdn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif?323f2c" alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  )&#8230;Surfcanyon does look cool&#8230;thanks for it,, once again&#8230;.I&#8217;ll try that a.s.a.p&#8230;.:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PrettyGirl_33</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/10-firefox-addons-to-enhance-google-search/#comment-387351</link>
		<dc:creator>PrettyGirl_33</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 17:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=17861#comment-387351</guid>
		<description>These seem to be some pretty cool extensions for Firefox! I am personally not a Firefox fan. However, I was forced to use FF as my browser of choice because I work for kgb.com and that is their browser of choice. (Sorry, I still use that ol&#039; browser &quot;Internet Explorer&quot; lol) Anyway, my question is &quot;Will adding 1 or even 2 or 3 of these add-on&#039;s to my FF make it run any slower than it already is?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These seem to be some pretty cool extensions for Firefox! I am personally not a Firefox fan. However, I was forced to use FF as my browser of choice because I work for kgb.com and that is their browser of choice. (Sorry, I still use that ol&#8217; browser &#8220;Internet Explorer&#8221; lol) Anyway, my question is &#8220;Will adding 1 or even 2 or 3 of these add-on&#8217;s to my FF make it run any slower than it already is?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Cramer</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/10-firefox-addons-to-enhance-google-search/#comment-387350</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Cramer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 16:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/?p=17861#comment-387350</guid>
		<description>Nice post! You should take a look at www.SurfCanyon.com - the application helps people find stuff buried in the Google results by re-ranking on the fly. Please let us know what you think. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post! You should take a look at <a href="http://www.SurfCanyon.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.SurfCanyon.com</a> &#8211; the application helps people find stuff buried in the Google results by re-ranking on the fly. Please let us know what you think. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached (Requested URI is rejected)
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.009 seconds using apc
Object Caching 315/316 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via main.makeuseoflimited.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.makeuseof.com @ 2012-02-11 04:57:29 -->
