<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PhotoshopExpress : Web-based Photoshop + Photo Sharing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.makeuseof.com/dir/photoshop-express/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/dir/photoshop-express/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 19:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nam</title>
		<link>http://www.makeuseof.com/dir/photoshop-express/#comment-16143</link>
		<dc:creator>Nam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeuseof.com/dir/photoshop-express/#comment-16143</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve tried this, and it was definitely overrated. It doesn&#039;t offer nearly as many features - or as much flexibility - as FotoFlexer. All this is doing is losing revenue for Adobe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve tried this, and it was definitely overrated. It doesn&#8217;t offer nearly as many features &#8211; or as much flexibility &#8211; as FotoFlexer. All this is doing is losing revenue for Adobe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached (Requested URI is rejected)
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.010 seconds using apc
Object Caching 191/192 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via main.makeuseoflimited.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.makeuseof.com @ 2012-02-10 22:15:54 -->
