Which is the best processor (AMD or Intel CPU) for HD video editing and encoding?
Question by Coole Friend /
Ads by Google

Which is the best processor (AMD or Intel CPU) for video editing and encoding? Which one is best for editing HD videos (AVCHD); the Intel Core i3 3220 Vs. AMD A10 5800k ?

Browse other questions & answers in the category ; tagged , , , , .
Join live MakeUseOf Groups on Grouvi App Join live Groups on Grouvi
Raspberry Pi Projects
Raspberry Pi Projects
577 Members
Technology Explained
Technology Explained
519 Members
Computer Hardware Talk
Computer Hardware Talk
501 Members
Arduino Projects
Arduino Projects
350 Members
Awesome Gadgets
Awesome Gadgets
138 Members
Apple Hardware Discussion
Apple Hardware Discussion
87 Members

Comments for this Question are closed.

Answers (15)
  • David

    Of course Intel, to think that Apple computers has it. I believe their products are known to have great performance for video and graphic works. Which are most of the designers and professional uses. It's like comparing products made in Japan versus from China.

  • Aniket Singh

    both are good but i personnaly recomend intel......

  • Adeel Azhar

    i would say AMD, using one right now.

  • Nitesh Badala

    intel core i7 or 3rd generation core processor

  • Hovsep Avedissian

    check this benchmark
    AMD A10-5800K APU scored 4,733
    Intel Core i3-3220 @ 3.30GHz scored 4,287

    A10-5800K vs. Core i3-3220 cpu review
    apparently if you do not play games they recommend Core i3-3220.

  • Anish P

    I would recommend the Intel processor since it has proven to be better than the AMD in most benchmark tests between the two. Also, I'm not sure if this is true for this processor but many computers AMD processors tended to overheat in the past, whereas there haven't been many problems with Intel.

  • Oron Joffe

    "Best" is a question of many things. The best combination would probably be Intel i7 and a powerful graphics card, along with two SSDs (one for software, one for main project file) and a large hard disc for everything else... Realistically you need to look at what is available within your budget (and form factor, e.g. if you're thinking of doing this on a laptop). The newer "A" series from AMD are not as fast in general processing as their Intel counterparts (e.g. A4 vs i3), but have very good graphics built-in, and if your video editing suite makes good use of the graphic processor you may find you get better value from them.

  • Alan Wade

    More reading here:
    This points to Intel although I have always been happy with AMD. At the moment I have the Phenom II x6 processor which is IMO very good.

    But, here is a graph showing Intel way ahead.

  • Neil Sharma

    From tech forums, I have read that "Intel has a dedicated video compression cirtcuitry built in their chip which makes video compression much much faster than AMD."

    Source: http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3345452

  • DalSan Mack

    It all depends on which programs you would use to edit and encode. Intel processors tend to be faster at processing data, but AMD has made great strides for making better graphics capabilities in which basic usage would not require getting a separate graphics accelerator card. Honestly, for better results, go with an Intel i5 and a moderate graphics accelerator card. If that is not possible, then go with what you can comfortably afford. AMD focuses more on gaming graphics and HD video graphics now than they do for pure processing power. The AMD FX series are better performing when out concerns processing power rather than graphics capabilities, but then the older Phenom II processors perform better still. Many software companies are finally jumping into utilizing graphics processing whenever possible, so keep that in mind. Intel processors are also much better performing when it concerns memory, meaning that the memory performance is a few times faster than the AMD APU's. This is a noticeable performance difference between the two, also. The AMD Phenom II x6 processor, which is much cheaper, combined with a nice graphics accelerator card, would outperform the A-10 in most ways, and would graphically be better than the i3 (since having a good GPU). The Phenom II CPU with the graphics card would probably be around the same price as either the i3 or the A-10. But, to answer your question (going by the fact that you did not state whether there would be a separate graphics card), overall performance may be better with the A-10. Data processing performance is better with the i3.

Load 10 more
Ads by Google
New comment

Please login to avoid entering captcha

Log In