Which app works better at allowing multiple users to share one computer – SoftExpand or Windows Multipoint server?

Joseph Videtto December 13, 2012
Pinterest Stumbleupon Whatsapp

Which app works better at allowing multiple users to share one computer – SoftExpand or Windows Multipoint server ?

And if you’ve used either, what are your experiences regarding things to watch for, and total cost per user?

  1. Joseph Videtto
    December 14, 2012 at 4:09 am

    ...well, SoftExpand seems to have more supporters so far - can anyone elaborate a little more on why ? (and by the way - trial eval periods are never a substitute for long-term experience with a product - by the end of the trial, you're just starting to get comfortable with the software IMHO)

    • Marian
      May 27, 2013 at 8:44 pm

      For video/games/graphics softxpand is much better. Multipoint server uses about 5 times more resources for video playback. For 3d multipoint server is useless.

      But for office work and classrooms multipoint offers better manageability - you can use direct connected, usb connected, rdp connected thin clients or even separate computers (win7) and you cam manage them from the multipoint server.

  2. Shankar C
    December 13, 2012 at 7:42 pm

    Softexpand is much more better than windows multipoint server.............

  3. Douglas Mutay
    December 13, 2012 at 3:49 pm

    I have tested SoftExpand and found it very good.

  4. ha14
    December 13, 2012 at 2:02 pm

    there should be trial period, download and see the difference.

    Upgrade from Windows Multipoint Server 2011 to SoftXpand 2011
    http://www.miniframe.com/knowledge-base.html?catid=1&kbartid=76

  5. Prashanth Rathore
    December 13, 2012 at 5:31 am

    Windows Multipoint server

Ads by Google